![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
This page is an Archive of the discussions from
Priyanka Chopra talk page (Discussion page).
![]() |
---|
The picture of Priyanka Chopra and Salman Khan is Not from the movie "Salaam E Ishq: A tribute to love." It is in fact a still from "Mujhse Shaadi Karogi". So I have corrected it. The website where it was found from is wrong in saying this is a still from that movie. This is a link to prove it. http://www.radiosargam.com/downloads/moviestills/m/mujhseshaadikarogi/index.html?album=11( Shakirfan 22:58, 19 March 2006 (UTC))
Ok...can we please agree on a picture? This is really becoming irritating! The tug of war needs to stop immediately! So to the person, or persons, that keep changing the picture every other day, please choose one and let it be...Thanks!
I'll always replace this hazy picture ( Image:PriyankaChops.jpg) with a better version ( Image:Pc19.jpg) from Commons. -- Victor D PARLE 18:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Removed the above unsourced and potentially libelous material. Drake 19:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
She's real hot —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
128.135.226.4 (
talk •
contribs)
in the bio they where saying shes 5f 3... thts NOT true..I changed it to 5f 8... Sunnybondsinghjalwehra 20:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
I replaced the model infobox with the actor infobox -- since none of the measurements are sourced, and since using a model infobox suggests that she's not a REAL actress. Zora 23:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Vandals try to deliberately change the facts and figures like date of birth, etc. Also there has been repeated spamming by addition of fan sites e.g. http://priyanka-forever.com and http://www.priyankachopra.org. I've added hidden text in in the infobox and external links section mentioning Wiki guidelines. Is protection or semi-protection of the article or part of it the solution? -- Victor D PARLE 18:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Need a section on Priyanka's views on relationships and marriage. Has she been romantically linked with her co-stars? It says here that she has a strong opinion on live-in relationships. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sarkar2 ( talk • contribs) 04:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC).
People like us are scared to upload pictures anymore. These tags of picture (GFDL, screenshots and all) sometimes makes no sense to attach with. Whenever u upload a picture, someone will mark it as 'Violation of wiki image upload policy' and the pic will be deleted within 2 weeks. So, these days people are refraining from uploading any pictures and so am i. -- Jayanta 14:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Looking into Hindi Wikipedia as well as to Google it seems that the correct orthography is using short a after ya, see e.g. story at josh18.com, about Priyanka at bhaskar.com, story at indianpad.com. Another orthography, namely प्रियंका चौपडा, is used at oneindia.in. I have therefore changed the Hindi version to प्रियंका. Long a after ya is used in the Marathi and Bengali Wikipedias. Moreover, the surname in Marathi Wikipedia is चोप्रा. As Marathi Wikipedian Mahitgar (see my talk page) wrote me a short time ago, Marathi does not use Devanagari characters with nuktas, therefore they probably transliterate ड़ as र and join it in order to form a common conjunct with preceding प. -- Zdeněk Wagner ( talk) 17:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
hin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.12.217.136 ( talk) 08:50, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
hey IP: 124.7.112.197 whats the problem with her other name Piggy Chops [1] [2] which is true and the name is given by her co-workers (Bollywood industry people) . its just like Shah Rukh Khan called as SRK or King Khan or Sanjay Dutt called Sanju Baba . some wikipedia editor may not like it personally .but wikipedia is not here for peosonal like or dislike . its here for fact and ref only . my request dont propagate ur personal like dislike in wikipedia -- Blogsd Contact —Preceding comment was added at 14:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Didn't Priyanka and Harman Baweja split? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.175.64.81 ( talk) 00:37, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
HER EARLY LIFE MENTIONED HAS AN ERROR,IN THE ARTICLE IT IS MENTIONED THAT HER MOTHER IS BIHARI, BUT INFACT HER MOTHER IS A MALAYALEE(from KERALA) SETTLED IN JAMSHEDPUR[Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
http://community.cinecurry.com/_Priyanka-is-a-half-Malayali/video/724753/57999.html?b=] I TRIED TO EDIT BUT COULD'NT.
117.206.33.183 (
talk)
07:54, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the change.I didn't that anyone would bother to do it. well the altered info has error again,u missed to mention MALAYALEE FAMIL (missed out the malayalee bit n left wid family). I did read about it long time ago too..that is a genuine info..thanx once again!!!cheers! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.206.38.203 ( talk) 16:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
now now....that was a tv show and do u think the info would be wrong?though u couldn't find a source to prove that mother was from bihari family,u didnt have any prob in mentioning that without a reliable source to meet the so called standards.why is it that now when i provided a source(just followin the rules mentioned) u seem to be asking for genuine proof,don't u think it is a bit biased?? http://www.zimbio.com/Bollywood+Movies/articles/-lGgON0mn2R/Priyanka+Chopra+Indian+film+actress —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.206.35.112 ( talk) 05:59, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Priyanka chopra is doing a lot of movies in 2011, why aint you ppl adding those movies in her wikipedia????!!?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.229.82.35 ( talk) 13:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
{{ editsemiprotected}}
Soniameloveyou (
talk)
12:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
2011-Saat khoon maaf
2011-Race
2011-Don 2-Chase begins again
2011-Silence
2011-Dostana 2 (special apperance)
I think it wasn't stated in the article that she appeared in many lux advertisments and number of advertisments she performed. Could someone make a list of them and state more detailed information about them? THANK YOU —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.235.201.176 ( talk) 03:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
{{ editsemiprotected}}
Soniameloveyou (
talk)
12:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
2011-Saat khoon maaf
2011-Race
2011-Don 2-Chase begins again
2011-Silence
2011-Dostana 2 (special apperance)
I think it wasn't stated in the article that she appeared in many lux advertisments and number of advertisments she performed. Could someone make a list of them and state more detailed information about them? THANK YOU —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.235.201.176 ( talk) 03:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
is Alibaba Aur 41 Chor still happening? and kunal kohli announced priyanka will be the lead in his upcoming film. any qualms if kunal kohli's next is added to her filmography? thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.60.16 ( talk) 16:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
can tweets be considered a source? kunal kohli tweeted about his next film with priyanka chopra and shahid kapoor so can this be added to her filmography? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.15.73.241 ( talk) 06:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
I highly doubt the article's neutrality. The article tries very hard to show Priyanka as a superlative actress. Many reviews are actually by the same critics, and many of them do not reflect the majority view. I challenge the editor who added these reviews to come up with evidence that this is really respresentative. Also, words like "highly" are thrown without consideration. Shahid • Talk2me 14:17, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
There lacks an explanation of why the above namespace redirects here. -- Ohconfucius ¡digame! 03:29, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Priyanka Chopra, not only is a Actress and model, but also a singer. She has sung a few lines of 'Right Here Right Now' from the film Bluffmaster and also does a few jingles. She also sang the song 'Tinka Tinka Zara Zara' on Rendezvous with Simi Garewal. Please insert this piece of information into the article as she is very multi-talented. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.194.231.189 ( talk) 22:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
I have changed the signature of Priyanka Chopra from
this file provided by
Prajwal21 to
provided by
me, as the signature provided by me is an svg file and has a better resolution among many other criterias.
GaneshBhakt (
talk)
08:30, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
You have duplicated the already used signature, which was uploaded by me. Its of same resolution, you have just changed the format and uploaded the same. Stop doing this, it wont be acceptable.
Prajwal
talk
12:48, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
This page has been fully protected. A fully protected page can be edited only by administrators. The protection has been currently placed till Septembe 8, 2011, but could be removed/downgraded to semi-protection in case consensus on the current signature issue is reached. The "Edit" tab for a protected page is replaced by a "View source" tab, where users can view and copy, but not edit, the wikitext of that page.
Any modification to this page should be proposed here. After
consensus has been established for the change, or if the change is uncontroversial, any administrator including I may make the necessary edits to the protected page. To draw administrators' attention to a request for an edit to a protected page, place the {{
editprotected}}
template on the talk page.
All requests to unprotect this page may be submitted at the page meant for such requests. Please get in touch directly with me on my talk page for any clarifications. Wifione ....... Leave a message 10:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
This BLP was full-protected due to an edit war over the signature file. After two editors have communicated to me that they should wish the full-protect to be lifted, I am initiating a discussion whose sole aim is to see whether a consensus exists on the signature issue. If I find reasonable discussions (irrespective of the stand being taken) and am convinced that such discussions will continue on this signature issue rather than a repeat edit war, I shall immediately lift the full protection and downgrade it to a semi protection within two days of such discussions taking place. In any case, there is an alternate method for editors to request that protection be lifted on this article or to request edits to this page while it is protected. The same has been described in the section above detailing the full-protection. Moving forward, editors are encouraged to kindly comment/support/oppose on the following options that they would prefer with respect to the signature. Wifione ....... Leave a message 09:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, imnew here... how do u edit a priyanka chopra page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bollybitz ( talk • contribs) 02:26, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
♥ I think we should add more sexy pics of Priyanka, because based on what we have here, it doesn't show much- beside the text to foreignors Also, we should give a bit more info about where she lives... personal life, but not too personal.
check this out- we can add info about this... -- Bollybitz ( talk) 02:39, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
I cannot stand it any longer. This guy's edits have become truly impossible to deal with: full of mistakes, grammar errors, POV, unsourced stuff, lack of spaces, unnecessary capitals, glorification, and now, abusive language in the edit summary as well. This is the last straw. The user has been reported after several warnings. Shahid • Talk2me 20:47, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
( Bollybuzz ( talk) 14:19, 29 August 2011 (UTC)) I Really Feel So because She is a Big Star And a big actress.her personal life is not present in details.She had been voted sexiest women in 2006 and she was goddess of atlantis.and other infos are missing.so.i beg all you amazing article wikipedians please expand it because other bollywood actress articles are larger than requirement.stop partiality other wise you should be blocked.
well,thanks as you have added my written infos to the article.
Priya Chopra is also has done humanitarian works.she is brand ambassador of ndtv greenathon which has raises more than Rs 100,000,000 in 3rd edition which were used to light a billion lives campaign by presenting solar lanterns to poor villages.she also spent a whole day with those villagers.
Some sections are misssing as they are present in other articles like Stage performance,In the media,personal life also her critical acclaim from her performance from anjaana anjaani and 7 khoon maaf is missing.Her love life,link-ups are missing.please add them.
It is a true work of an wikipedian to make all articles a great pleasure to read.( Bollybuzz ( talk) 15:44, 7 September 2011 (UTC))
Please put up a different picture because Priyanka Chopra isn't that white. The picture is highlighted and lightened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.81.195.196 ( talk) 02:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Why is there no mention of Priyanka Chopra's relationships? Ms. Bachan Rai's relationships have been discussed on Wikipedia, and i do not understand why my posts on Priyanka Chopra keep getting deleted. They are facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.62.116.19 ( talk) 01:50, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Let's stop the edit war and discuss the issue. I don't see anything wrong with a separate section on her beauty pageant wins. It is a big accomplishment that deserves to be highlighted. Comparing other of Indian cinema's past beauty queens: Aishwarya_Rai has a section called "Modelling career"; Sushmita Sen has a "Miss Universe" section; Lara Dutta has a "Pageantry" section; Dia Mirza has "Miss Asia Pacific"; etc. No one is complaining about that, and don't come back with OSE. The section can be expanded a bit and renamed, but should not be deleted, IMO. Other opinions? BollyJeff || talk 19:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Nope, anything challenged needs a source. And someone is challenging the lack of sources. Wifione Message 05:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
I completely disagree. Has anyone ever gone through WP:UNDUE? Highlighting a "miss world" achievement in a single section undoubtedly gives too much weight to it. "No one is complaining about that, and don't come back with OSE." If you cite other articles, WP:OSE has to be brought in, it cannot be an excuse to violate it. Secret of success ( talk) 06:11, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Mentioning her win in pageants is required. It being a seperate section is also required and it certainly is not overdue given the fact that thats how she came in the film industry and mainly she also acknowledges it. The section can be a sub-section somewhere in the article. But the current position above the Acting Career is suitable as it has a chronological flow. Making it a subsection in the Acting career sounds stupid. I, hence, see no need to change it.
And why do TheRedPenOfDoom and Wifione require sources for those statements? Sources should be provided for stuff that has been challeneged reasonably. If i go to the article
Miss World i will find out that since she won in 2000 no other Indian has won that crown. And i can write this in her article. Why do i have to dumbly wait for some newsreporter to notice this and include it in his article and then use it here? -
Animeshkulkarni (
talk)
16:12, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:IPL 5 pohoto(11).jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:IPL 5 pohoto(11).jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:53, 28 April 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Priyanka Chopra at India's Glam Divas12121.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Priyanka Chopra at India's Glam Divas12121.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 15:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC) |
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Priyanka Chopra's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "NDTV":
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:23, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
some section should be added she was declared queen of atlantis on opening ceremony of atlantis dubai,( 223.176.136.45 ( talk) 02:37, 18 July 2012 (UTC))
I have a little worry about the flow of the article from the Early life and pageantry to the Bollywood debut. It's just too random and does not bridge the transition at all. I was wondering if any one has any ideas to tie up the loose ends, or I can find some stuff. Like what lead to her enrolling for film roles, was her modelling career on the fall, was she already decided about a life as an actress etc. I think I have an old Femina magazine where the 2000 Femina Miss India winners were interviewed. She might have said something in there. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Secret of success ( talk · contribs) 12:42, 14 October 2012 (UTC) Hi, I will be reviewing this article. It is quite long and has a long way to go, so the review may take some time. Hope I've everyone's patience on my side. Here are some starting comments:
That's it for a start. Hope to get going soon and promote the article at the quickest. Secret of success ( talk) 12:42, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
That's about it for her acting career section. Once these are done, just ping me and I'll review them and proceed. Secret of success ( talk) 16:10, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment - There are so many statements which are not verified by the given source. Isn't it better if the article is quick-failed and a check done, and then it is re-nominated? Secret of success ( talk) 07:37, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Done -
BollyJeff |
talk
14:50, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Based on the review above, one can conclude that the article is :
Yes you guessed and heard it right,this article is DISASTER,without knowledge.i can prove it......ALL are sources are of 2011-12 ,if this was an article from long time it must have old sources,but most of the sources are new.WHAT writers were doing from 2000.a complete letdown.good article nominee ARE YOU JOKING? this among WORST ARTICLE ON INTERNET.too short,lack pictures,lack of writing style,lack of old sources,lack of information about music career.it doesn't decribe much.Too short as compared to other Bollywood actress.( Pks1142 ( talk) 17:01, 18 October 2012 (UTC)).A DISASTER,IT SHOULD GET WORST ARTICLE AWARD.
I know this article is currently going through GAN and I would like to offer a few inputs. To begin with, I've noticed that almost all of her films, if not all, post 2008 have listed multiple reviews from critics. If you take a look: Fashion, Kaminey, 7KM, Don 2, TMK and Barfi! all have 2 reviews and they are along the same lines. If one single review can convey the same information as two reivews, I really don't see the need of providing two. Lastly, the sub-section "success" is listed from 2008-11; you cannot really call that a success period for her as her only two successful films were Kaminey and Don 2 - the rest were either moderately successful or failures. Something like this would be better suitable: "Debut and breakthrough" from 2002-03, "Initial success and professional setbacks" from 2004–08 and finally "Fashion and recent work" from 2008–present. Regards -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 16:33, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Someone has posted this feedback. I can not understand which last statement they are talking about! Any guesses? -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 13:07, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
hello, i mean to say ,categories according to wikipedia is that An article which come under certain category so' she was signed as INTERSCOP/ISLAND Records and thus she belongs to these categories.It doesn't have anything to do with An established singer.As wikipedia has all these Ctegories about above records so it should be added like other small artists that have not made any mark their articles too has been included in this categories.According to wikipedia project songs these has to be included.It doesn't show any thing about known singer or unknown.( 106.218.133.74 ( talk) 07:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello everyone,I feel it has potential to be the featured article on Wikipedia but from my point of view its need to expanded little more.I can give input about the article
if you need more help I can give.thank you.( Pks1142 ( talk) 12:06, 10 November 2012 (UTC))
Rated GA for theater,but C on other wikipeoject.I don't understand.Please help( Pks1142 ( talk) 12:17, 15 November 2012 (UTC))
Why important infos are not included??? I m giving every needed info with reference....
User:Bollyjeff and I have been having a conversation on my talk page about preparing this article for FAC. I told him I would review the sources used and give my input as to how they could be improved prior to a future nomination. Following are my comments. Please don't be discouraged by their length: there is a high bar for sourcing in WP:BLPs and in WP:FACs, but I think all of these issues will be relatively simple to address, and the article will be all the stronger for it.
WP:RS issues:
Citations that do not support the assertion cited to them:
Cite the best sources:
Dead links that need to be replaced:
Formatting issues:
I will watchlist this page in case anyone has a question for me. Congrats on the good work done thus far, and good luck! Maralia ( talk) 00:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
I am already working on this. The toughest one to replace is probably gonna be the Zee News biography. Its been hard to find a RS that tells which schools she went to in USA. The problem with the Oneindia bio is that it appeared to be copied from Wikipedia itself. I have gotten rid of it already. The Zee News bio may be the similar. I just noticed that it mentions a different school than that in the article. I need help finding other sources for her early life stuff. We may have to just trim that section. BollyJeff | talk 13:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
I think that I have covered all of the points above. Can you check, and recommend anything else while we wait for a copy-editor from the guild? BollyJeff | talk 17:32, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Bolly can you help me with this sentence "Chopra has said that she is very close to her family and is grateful for what her family has sacrificed for her". What kinda sacrifices are we talking about here? That should be briefly mentioned, otherwise the sentence ends in an abrupt tone making the readers wonder what exactly is she talking about. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:29, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Give me a pat on my back guys.COME ON. Green Parakeet ( talk) 17:52, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Hope thse can help you. Green Parakeet ( talk) 19:06, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
This page is an Archive of the discussions from
Priyanka Chopra talk page (Discussion page).
![]() |
---|
The picture of Priyanka Chopra and Salman Khan is Not from the movie "Salaam E Ishq: A tribute to love." It is in fact a still from "Mujhse Shaadi Karogi". So I have corrected it. The website where it was found from is wrong in saying this is a still from that movie. This is a link to prove it. http://www.radiosargam.com/downloads/moviestills/m/mujhseshaadikarogi/index.html?album=11( Shakirfan 22:58, 19 March 2006 (UTC))
Ok...can we please agree on a picture? This is really becoming irritating! The tug of war needs to stop immediately! So to the person, or persons, that keep changing the picture every other day, please choose one and let it be...Thanks!
I'll always replace this hazy picture ( Image:PriyankaChops.jpg) with a better version ( Image:Pc19.jpg) from Commons. -- Victor D PARLE 18:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Removed the above unsourced and potentially libelous material. Drake 19:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
She's real hot —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
128.135.226.4 (
talk •
contribs)
in the bio they where saying shes 5f 3... thts NOT true..I changed it to 5f 8... Sunnybondsinghjalwehra 20:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
I replaced the model infobox with the actor infobox -- since none of the measurements are sourced, and since using a model infobox suggests that she's not a REAL actress. Zora 23:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Vandals try to deliberately change the facts and figures like date of birth, etc. Also there has been repeated spamming by addition of fan sites e.g. http://priyanka-forever.com and http://www.priyankachopra.org. I've added hidden text in in the infobox and external links section mentioning Wiki guidelines. Is protection or semi-protection of the article or part of it the solution? -- Victor D PARLE 18:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Need a section on Priyanka's views on relationships and marriage. Has she been romantically linked with her co-stars? It says here that she has a strong opinion on live-in relationships. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sarkar2 ( talk • contribs) 04:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC).
People like us are scared to upload pictures anymore. These tags of picture (GFDL, screenshots and all) sometimes makes no sense to attach with. Whenever u upload a picture, someone will mark it as 'Violation of wiki image upload policy' and the pic will be deleted within 2 weeks. So, these days people are refraining from uploading any pictures and so am i. -- Jayanta 14:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Looking into Hindi Wikipedia as well as to Google it seems that the correct orthography is using short a after ya, see e.g. story at josh18.com, about Priyanka at bhaskar.com, story at indianpad.com. Another orthography, namely प्रियंका चौपडा, is used at oneindia.in. I have therefore changed the Hindi version to प्रियंका. Long a after ya is used in the Marathi and Bengali Wikipedias. Moreover, the surname in Marathi Wikipedia is चोप्रा. As Marathi Wikipedian Mahitgar (see my talk page) wrote me a short time ago, Marathi does not use Devanagari characters with nuktas, therefore they probably transliterate ड़ as र and join it in order to form a common conjunct with preceding प. -- Zdeněk Wagner ( talk) 17:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
hin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.12.217.136 ( talk) 08:50, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
hey IP: 124.7.112.197 whats the problem with her other name Piggy Chops [1] [2] which is true and the name is given by her co-workers (Bollywood industry people) . its just like Shah Rukh Khan called as SRK or King Khan or Sanjay Dutt called Sanju Baba . some wikipedia editor may not like it personally .but wikipedia is not here for peosonal like or dislike . its here for fact and ref only . my request dont propagate ur personal like dislike in wikipedia -- Blogsd Contact —Preceding comment was added at 14:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Didn't Priyanka and Harman Baweja split? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.175.64.81 ( talk) 00:37, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
HER EARLY LIFE MENTIONED HAS AN ERROR,IN THE ARTICLE IT IS MENTIONED THAT HER MOTHER IS BIHARI, BUT INFACT HER MOTHER IS A MALAYALEE(from KERALA) SETTLED IN JAMSHEDPUR[Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
http://community.cinecurry.com/_Priyanka-is-a-half-Malayali/video/724753/57999.html?b=] I TRIED TO EDIT BUT COULD'NT.
117.206.33.183 (
talk)
07:54, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the change.I didn't that anyone would bother to do it. well the altered info has error again,u missed to mention MALAYALEE FAMIL (missed out the malayalee bit n left wid family). I did read about it long time ago too..that is a genuine info..thanx once again!!!cheers! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.206.38.203 ( talk) 16:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
now now....that was a tv show and do u think the info would be wrong?though u couldn't find a source to prove that mother was from bihari family,u didnt have any prob in mentioning that without a reliable source to meet the so called standards.why is it that now when i provided a source(just followin the rules mentioned) u seem to be asking for genuine proof,don't u think it is a bit biased?? http://www.zimbio.com/Bollywood+Movies/articles/-lGgON0mn2R/Priyanka+Chopra+Indian+film+actress —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.206.35.112 ( talk) 05:59, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Priyanka chopra is doing a lot of movies in 2011, why aint you ppl adding those movies in her wikipedia????!!?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.229.82.35 ( talk) 13:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
{{ editsemiprotected}}
Soniameloveyou (
talk)
12:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
2011-Saat khoon maaf
2011-Race
2011-Don 2-Chase begins again
2011-Silence
2011-Dostana 2 (special apperance)
I think it wasn't stated in the article that she appeared in many lux advertisments and number of advertisments she performed. Could someone make a list of them and state more detailed information about them? THANK YOU —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.235.201.176 ( talk) 03:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
{{ editsemiprotected}}
Soniameloveyou (
talk)
12:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
2011-Saat khoon maaf
2011-Race
2011-Don 2-Chase begins again
2011-Silence
2011-Dostana 2 (special apperance)
I think it wasn't stated in the article that she appeared in many lux advertisments and number of advertisments she performed. Could someone make a list of them and state more detailed information about them? THANK YOU —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.235.201.176 ( talk) 03:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
is Alibaba Aur 41 Chor still happening? and kunal kohli announced priyanka will be the lead in his upcoming film. any qualms if kunal kohli's next is added to her filmography? thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.60.16 ( talk) 16:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
can tweets be considered a source? kunal kohli tweeted about his next film with priyanka chopra and shahid kapoor so can this be added to her filmography? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.15.73.241 ( talk) 06:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
I highly doubt the article's neutrality. The article tries very hard to show Priyanka as a superlative actress. Many reviews are actually by the same critics, and many of them do not reflect the majority view. I challenge the editor who added these reviews to come up with evidence that this is really respresentative. Also, words like "highly" are thrown without consideration. Shahid • Talk2me 14:17, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
There lacks an explanation of why the above namespace redirects here. -- Ohconfucius ¡digame! 03:29, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Priyanka Chopra, not only is a Actress and model, but also a singer. She has sung a few lines of 'Right Here Right Now' from the film Bluffmaster and also does a few jingles. She also sang the song 'Tinka Tinka Zara Zara' on Rendezvous with Simi Garewal. Please insert this piece of information into the article as she is very multi-talented. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.194.231.189 ( talk) 22:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
I have changed the signature of Priyanka Chopra from
this file provided by
Prajwal21 to
provided by
me, as the signature provided by me is an svg file and has a better resolution among many other criterias.
GaneshBhakt (
talk)
08:30, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
You have duplicated the already used signature, which was uploaded by me. Its of same resolution, you have just changed the format and uploaded the same. Stop doing this, it wont be acceptable.
Prajwal
talk
12:48, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
This page has been fully protected. A fully protected page can be edited only by administrators. The protection has been currently placed till Septembe 8, 2011, but could be removed/downgraded to semi-protection in case consensus on the current signature issue is reached. The "Edit" tab for a protected page is replaced by a "View source" tab, where users can view and copy, but not edit, the wikitext of that page.
Any modification to this page should be proposed here. After
consensus has been established for the change, or if the change is uncontroversial, any administrator including I may make the necessary edits to the protected page. To draw administrators' attention to a request for an edit to a protected page, place the {{
editprotected}}
template on the talk page.
All requests to unprotect this page may be submitted at the page meant for such requests. Please get in touch directly with me on my talk page for any clarifications. Wifione ....... Leave a message 10:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
This BLP was full-protected due to an edit war over the signature file. After two editors have communicated to me that they should wish the full-protect to be lifted, I am initiating a discussion whose sole aim is to see whether a consensus exists on the signature issue. If I find reasonable discussions (irrespective of the stand being taken) and am convinced that such discussions will continue on this signature issue rather than a repeat edit war, I shall immediately lift the full protection and downgrade it to a semi protection within two days of such discussions taking place. In any case, there is an alternate method for editors to request that protection be lifted on this article or to request edits to this page while it is protected. The same has been described in the section above detailing the full-protection. Moving forward, editors are encouraged to kindly comment/support/oppose on the following options that they would prefer with respect to the signature. Wifione ....... Leave a message 09:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, imnew here... how do u edit a priyanka chopra page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bollybitz ( talk • contribs) 02:26, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
♥ I think we should add more sexy pics of Priyanka, because based on what we have here, it doesn't show much- beside the text to foreignors Also, we should give a bit more info about where she lives... personal life, but not too personal.
check this out- we can add info about this... -- Bollybitz ( talk) 02:39, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
I cannot stand it any longer. This guy's edits have become truly impossible to deal with: full of mistakes, grammar errors, POV, unsourced stuff, lack of spaces, unnecessary capitals, glorification, and now, abusive language in the edit summary as well. This is the last straw. The user has been reported after several warnings. Shahid • Talk2me 20:47, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
( Bollybuzz ( talk) 14:19, 29 August 2011 (UTC)) I Really Feel So because She is a Big Star And a big actress.her personal life is not present in details.She had been voted sexiest women in 2006 and she was goddess of atlantis.and other infos are missing.so.i beg all you amazing article wikipedians please expand it because other bollywood actress articles are larger than requirement.stop partiality other wise you should be blocked.
well,thanks as you have added my written infos to the article.
Priya Chopra is also has done humanitarian works.she is brand ambassador of ndtv greenathon which has raises more than Rs 100,000,000 in 3rd edition which were used to light a billion lives campaign by presenting solar lanterns to poor villages.she also spent a whole day with those villagers.
Some sections are misssing as they are present in other articles like Stage performance,In the media,personal life also her critical acclaim from her performance from anjaana anjaani and 7 khoon maaf is missing.Her love life,link-ups are missing.please add them.
It is a true work of an wikipedian to make all articles a great pleasure to read.( Bollybuzz ( talk) 15:44, 7 September 2011 (UTC))
Please put up a different picture because Priyanka Chopra isn't that white. The picture is highlighted and lightened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.81.195.196 ( talk) 02:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Why is there no mention of Priyanka Chopra's relationships? Ms. Bachan Rai's relationships have been discussed on Wikipedia, and i do not understand why my posts on Priyanka Chopra keep getting deleted. They are facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.62.116.19 ( talk) 01:50, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Let's stop the edit war and discuss the issue. I don't see anything wrong with a separate section on her beauty pageant wins. It is a big accomplishment that deserves to be highlighted. Comparing other of Indian cinema's past beauty queens: Aishwarya_Rai has a section called "Modelling career"; Sushmita Sen has a "Miss Universe" section; Lara Dutta has a "Pageantry" section; Dia Mirza has "Miss Asia Pacific"; etc. No one is complaining about that, and don't come back with OSE. The section can be expanded a bit and renamed, but should not be deleted, IMO. Other opinions? BollyJeff || talk 19:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Nope, anything challenged needs a source. And someone is challenging the lack of sources. Wifione Message 05:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
I completely disagree. Has anyone ever gone through WP:UNDUE? Highlighting a "miss world" achievement in a single section undoubtedly gives too much weight to it. "No one is complaining about that, and don't come back with OSE." If you cite other articles, WP:OSE has to be brought in, it cannot be an excuse to violate it. Secret of success ( talk) 06:11, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Mentioning her win in pageants is required. It being a seperate section is also required and it certainly is not overdue given the fact that thats how she came in the film industry and mainly she also acknowledges it. The section can be a sub-section somewhere in the article. But the current position above the Acting Career is suitable as it has a chronological flow. Making it a subsection in the Acting career sounds stupid. I, hence, see no need to change it.
And why do TheRedPenOfDoom and Wifione require sources for those statements? Sources should be provided for stuff that has been challeneged reasonably. If i go to the article
Miss World i will find out that since she won in 2000 no other Indian has won that crown. And i can write this in her article. Why do i have to dumbly wait for some newsreporter to notice this and include it in his article and then use it here? -
Animeshkulkarni (
talk)
16:12, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:IPL 5 pohoto(11).jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:IPL 5 pohoto(11).jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:53, 28 April 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Priyanka Chopra at India's Glam Divas12121.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Priyanka Chopra at India's Glam Divas12121.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 15:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC) |
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Priyanka Chopra's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "NDTV":
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:23, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
some section should be added she was declared queen of atlantis on opening ceremony of atlantis dubai,( 223.176.136.45 ( talk) 02:37, 18 July 2012 (UTC))
I have a little worry about the flow of the article from the Early life and pageantry to the Bollywood debut. It's just too random and does not bridge the transition at all. I was wondering if any one has any ideas to tie up the loose ends, or I can find some stuff. Like what lead to her enrolling for film roles, was her modelling career on the fall, was she already decided about a life as an actress etc. I think I have an old Femina magazine where the 2000 Femina Miss India winners were interviewed. She might have said something in there. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Secret of success ( talk · contribs) 12:42, 14 October 2012 (UTC) Hi, I will be reviewing this article. It is quite long and has a long way to go, so the review may take some time. Hope I've everyone's patience on my side. Here are some starting comments:
That's it for a start. Hope to get going soon and promote the article at the quickest. Secret of success ( talk) 12:42, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
That's about it for her acting career section. Once these are done, just ping me and I'll review them and proceed. Secret of success ( talk) 16:10, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment - There are so many statements which are not verified by the given source. Isn't it better if the article is quick-failed and a check done, and then it is re-nominated? Secret of success ( talk) 07:37, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Done -
BollyJeff |
talk
14:50, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Based on the review above, one can conclude that the article is :
Yes you guessed and heard it right,this article is DISASTER,without knowledge.i can prove it......ALL are sources are of 2011-12 ,if this was an article from long time it must have old sources,but most of the sources are new.WHAT writers were doing from 2000.a complete letdown.good article nominee ARE YOU JOKING? this among WORST ARTICLE ON INTERNET.too short,lack pictures,lack of writing style,lack of old sources,lack of information about music career.it doesn't decribe much.Too short as compared to other Bollywood actress.( Pks1142 ( talk) 17:01, 18 October 2012 (UTC)).A DISASTER,IT SHOULD GET WORST ARTICLE AWARD.
I know this article is currently going through GAN and I would like to offer a few inputs. To begin with, I've noticed that almost all of her films, if not all, post 2008 have listed multiple reviews from critics. If you take a look: Fashion, Kaminey, 7KM, Don 2, TMK and Barfi! all have 2 reviews and they are along the same lines. If one single review can convey the same information as two reivews, I really don't see the need of providing two. Lastly, the sub-section "success" is listed from 2008-11; you cannot really call that a success period for her as her only two successful films were Kaminey and Don 2 - the rest were either moderately successful or failures. Something like this would be better suitable: "Debut and breakthrough" from 2002-03, "Initial success and professional setbacks" from 2004–08 and finally "Fashion and recent work" from 2008–present. Regards -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 16:33, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Someone has posted this feedback. I can not understand which last statement they are talking about! Any guesses? -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 13:07, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
hello, i mean to say ,categories according to wikipedia is that An article which come under certain category so' she was signed as INTERSCOP/ISLAND Records and thus she belongs to these categories.It doesn't have anything to do with An established singer.As wikipedia has all these Ctegories about above records so it should be added like other small artists that have not made any mark their articles too has been included in this categories.According to wikipedia project songs these has to be included.It doesn't show any thing about known singer or unknown.( 106.218.133.74 ( talk) 07:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello everyone,I feel it has potential to be the featured article on Wikipedia but from my point of view its need to expanded little more.I can give input about the article
if you need more help I can give.thank you.( Pks1142 ( talk) 12:06, 10 November 2012 (UTC))
Rated GA for theater,but C on other wikipeoject.I don't understand.Please help( Pks1142 ( talk) 12:17, 15 November 2012 (UTC))
Why important infos are not included??? I m giving every needed info with reference....
User:Bollyjeff and I have been having a conversation on my talk page about preparing this article for FAC. I told him I would review the sources used and give my input as to how they could be improved prior to a future nomination. Following are my comments. Please don't be discouraged by their length: there is a high bar for sourcing in WP:BLPs and in WP:FACs, but I think all of these issues will be relatively simple to address, and the article will be all the stronger for it.
WP:RS issues:
Citations that do not support the assertion cited to them:
Cite the best sources:
Dead links that need to be replaced:
Formatting issues:
I will watchlist this page in case anyone has a question for me. Congrats on the good work done thus far, and good luck! Maralia ( talk) 00:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
I am already working on this. The toughest one to replace is probably gonna be the Zee News biography. Its been hard to find a RS that tells which schools she went to in USA. The problem with the Oneindia bio is that it appeared to be copied from Wikipedia itself. I have gotten rid of it already. The Zee News bio may be the similar. I just noticed that it mentions a different school than that in the article. I need help finding other sources for her early life stuff. We may have to just trim that section. BollyJeff | talk 13:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
I think that I have covered all of the points above. Can you check, and recommend anything else while we wait for a copy-editor from the guild? BollyJeff | talk 17:32, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Bolly can you help me with this sentence "Chopra has said that she is very close to her family and is grateful for what her family has sacrificed for her". What kinda sacrifices are we talking about here? That should be briefly mentioned, otherwise the sentence ends in an abrupt tone making the readers wonder what exactly is she talking about. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:29, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Give me a pat on my back guys.COME ON. Green Parakeet ( talk) 17:52, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Hope thse can help you. Green Parakeet ( talk) 19:06, 10 December 2012 (UTC)