![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 June 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am nominating this article for deletion on the following grounds:
The article appears to be WP:OR. It cites no general discussion of what the term 'private sector involvement' means, but instead cherry-picks sources in order to describe aspects of the Greek government-debt crisis: a subject already more than adequately described in its own article. It also cites no sources whatsoever for much of its content. I have no doubt that plenty of sources using the phrase 'private sector involvement' could be found, but without sources which meaningfully define the term, rather than just using it in passing, an encyclopaedic article not reliant on synthesis seems impossible, and I very much doubt that any clear definition exists, given the many contexts in which the phrase can be used. Governments frequently interact with the private sector, but basing an article about a particular type of 'involvement' cannot be justified based on a particular Wikipedia contributor's own analysis.
If you wish to contribute to the AFD discussion, please do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Private sector involvement. 86.147.197.65 ( talk) 21:17, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
(Note: as an unregistered contributor I cannot complete the AFD process myself: I have placed a request at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion asking that a registered contributor finish the process: this may take a little time. 86.147.197.65 ( talk) 21:21, 12 June 2018 (UTC))
If this article survives AfD (I suspect it is heading towards 'no consensus) readers may be interested to see an alternative version [1] (rapidly reverted by the article creator) which explained what the subject matter was, avoided unnecessary digressions about what it wasn't, and similar digressions on what some people think the proper usage of a common three-letter phrase ought to be. I am not advocating restoring this version without prior discussion, but will initiate such discussion at a later date, along with a proposal to amend the title to make the context clear, per Wikipedia:Article_titles#Precision_and_disambiguation. 86.147.197.65 ( talk) 17:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Article titles#Precision and disambiguation this article should clearly be renamed, as the phrase 'private sector involvement' is used in so many unconnected contexts, and an ambiguous title serves no useful purpose. I'd suggest 'Private sector involvement in sovereign debt crisis resolution', but if anyone has an alternative suggestion to make, please do so. 86.147.197.65 ( talk) 19:31, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
More specifically the following: The PSI was touted as a great success because it gave the Greek economy breathing space, but in reality, it depleted the capital of all Greek lenders,[17] as well as the reserves of Greek pension funds,[18]
The Greek State anually makes substantial contributions to the Pension Funds (since they are public), the amount lost during the PSI was miniscule compared to the income the pension funds receive from the Greek Government. In addition even if Pension Funds did have a risk later. They could be refinanced exactly the same way as the Banks did. The real reason that the Pension Funds were involed in the PSI is because they were holding substantial amounts of Greek Bonds thus "forced" to agree in order for the PSI to go forward. Moreover, Cited Sources for this claim have been proven to be biased in the past.
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 June 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am nominating this article for deletion on the following grounds:
The article appears to be WP:OR. It cites no general discussion of what the term 'private sector involvement' means, but instead cherry-picks sources in order to describe aspects of the Greek government-debt crisis: a subject already more than adequately described in its own article. It also cites no sources whatsoever for much of its content. I have no doubt that plenty of sources using the phrase 'private sector involvement' could be found, but without sources which meaningfully define the term, rather than just using it in passing, an encyclopaedic article not reliant on synthesis seems impossible, and I very much doubt that any clear definition exists, given the many contexts in which the phrase can be used. Governments frequently interact with the private sector, but basing an article about a particular type of 'involvement' cannot be justified based on a particular Wikipedia contributor's own analysis.
If you wish to contribute to the AFD discussion, please do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Private sector involvement. 86.147.197.65 ( talk) 21:17, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
(Note: as an unregistered contributor I cannot complete the AFD process myself: I have placed a request at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion asking that a registered contributor finish the process: this may take a little time. 86.147.197.65 ( talk) 21:21, 12 June 2018 (UTC))
If this article survives AfD (I suspect it is heading towards 'no consensus) readers may be interested to see an alternative version [1] (rapidly reverted by the article creator) which explained what the subject matter was, avoided unnecessary digressions about what it wasn't, and similar digressions on what some people think the proper usage of a common three-letter phrase ought to be. I am not advocating restoring this version without prior discussion, but will initiate such discussion at a later date, along with a proposal to amend the title to make the context clear, per Wikipedia:Article_titles#Precision_and_disambiguation. 86.147.197.65 ( talk) 17:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Article titles#Precision and disambiguation this article should clearly be renamed, as the phrase 'private sector involvement' is used in so many unconnected contexts, and an ambiguous title serves no useful purpose. I'd suggest 'Private sector involvement in sovereign debt crisis resolution', but if anyone has an alternative suggestion to make, please do so. 86.147.197.65 ( talk) 19:31, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
More specifically the following: The PSI was touted as a great success because it gave the Greek economy breathing space, but in reality, it depleted the capital of all Greek lenders,[17] as well as the reserves of Greek pension funds,[18]
The Greek State anually makes substantial contributions to the Pension Funds (since they are public), the amount lost during the PSI was miniscule compared to the income the pension funds receive from the Greek Government. In addition even if Pension Funds did have a risk later. They could be refinanced exactly the same way as the Banks did. The real reason that the Pension Funds were involed in the PSI is because they were holding substantial amounts of Greek Bonds thus "forced" to agree in order for the PSI to go forward. Moreover, Cited Sources for this claim have been proven to be biased in the past.