From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

orphan tag moved

I'm of the admittedly unconventional opinion that orphan tags don't make sense at the top of the page — you don't have ideas about what might link till after you read the article. If orphan tags serve any purpose in the first place. I think they're distracting for the user who's looking for info; it's only of concern to editors. And more important is whether the article links to other articles; in some ways that's a better test of whether it's notable or relevant. General articles link to more and more specific articles; these most specific articles link outward. Cynwolfe ( talk) 19:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

orphan tag moved

I'm of the admittedly unconventional opinion that orphan tags don't make sense at the top of the page — you don't have ideas about what might link till after you read the article. If orphan tags serve any purpose in the first place. I think they're distracting for the user who's looking for info; it's only of concern to editors. And more important is whether the article links to other articles; in some ways that's a better test of whether it's notable or relevant. General articles link to more and more specific articles; these most specific articles link outward. Cynwolfe ( talk) 19:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook