![]() | This page was
proposed for deletion by
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk ·
contribs) on 3 August 2015 with the comment: Does not appear to be a notable term: i.e. an unremarkable neologism. It was contested by MelanieN ( talk · contribs) on 2015-08-10 with the comment: declining prod; the term seems to be widely used. AfD remains a possibility. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm really not seeing why this should be its own article instead of merged with the Pornography or Sexualization article. Sure, when citing WP:NEO, one can argue that it's a notable neologism, but one can also argue that, per WP:No page, that doesn't mean it needs its own article. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 02:12, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
This reads like a poorly written high school essay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.108.175.194 ( talk) 06:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Agreed that this article should be merged, per Flyer22 Reborn. -Crossroads- ( talk) 04:11, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Could someone please make this article better? Thanks, 184.19.98.82 ( talk) 21:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
"Pornographication" is not the correct term for the topic, which is pornification: the mainstreaming of porn.
Currently pornification redirects here, but it should be the other way. -- WriterArtistDC ( talk) 18:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
The entire "History" section can be deleted, since it is a history of porn, not pornification, which is a 21st century concept.-- WriterArtistDC ( talk) 19:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Content that I had previously deleted as trivial and unsourced has been restored, with the addition of a citation that has nothing to do with the content, so I have again removed it. The new reference is about opposition to actual porn, not the pornification of mainstream culture.
I am sure there are sources that could be used to support content on the Evangelical viewpoint on pornification, but that would require thought. WriterArtistDC ( talk) 02:23, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This page was
proposed for deletion by
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk ·
contribs) on 3 August 2015 with the comment: Does not appear to be a notable term: i.e. an unremarkable neologism. It was contested by MelanieN ( talk · contribs) on 2015-08-10 with the comment: declining prod; the term seems to be widely used. AfD remains a possibility. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm really not seeing why this should be its own article instead of merged with the Pornography or Sexualization article. Sure, when citing WP:NEO, one can argue that it's a notable neologism, but one can also argue that, per WP:No page, that doesn't mean it needs its own article. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 02:12, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
This reads like a poorly written high school essay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.108.175.194 ( talk) 06:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Agreed that this article should be merged, per Flyer22 Reborn. -Crossroads- ( talk) 04:11, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Could someone please make this article better? Thanks, 184.19.98.82 ( talk) 21:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
"Pornographication" is not the correct term for the topic, which is pornification: the mainstreaming of porn.
Currently pornification redirects here, but it should be the other way. -- WriterArtistDC ( talk) 18:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
The entire "History" section can be deleted, since it is a history of porn, not pornification, which is a 21st century concept.-- WriterArtistDC ( talk) 19:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Content that I had previously deleted as trivial and unsourced has been restored, with the addition of a citation that has nothing to do with the content, so I have again removed it. The new reference is about opposition to actual porn, not the pornification of mainstream culture.
I am sure there are sources that could be used to support content on the Evangelical viewpoint on pornification, but that would require thought. WriterArtistDC ( talk) 02:23, 15 May 2023 (UTC)