![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Poppyseed muffin page were merged into Muffin#Poppyseed muffin on 17 November 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Propose merge to Muffin and Poppy seed.
The content in this article can be summarized in a few points:
The first point is a fairly simple fact that can be included in the muffin article. That that article has no mention of, or link to, poppyseed muffin suggests that this is not a type of muffin that is substantially more notable than any other, to the extent that it warrants its own article, nor does the article appear to have much potential for expansion. The second point is not specific to the muffin and can be discussed in poppy seed in a more objective, generalized manner. On the third point, this article hangs its claim to notability, which means this article has an inherent systemic bias. Merging this content to muffin and poppy seed, with links between the two, will allow a less biased and more encyclopedic treatment of this topic. Ibadibam ( talk) 17:07, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Poppyseed muffin page were merged into Muffin#Poppyseed muffin on 17 November 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Propose merge to Muffin and Poppy seed.
The content in this article can be summarized in a few points:
The first point is a fairly simple fact that can be included in the muffin article. That that article has no mention of, or link to, poppyseed muffin suggests that this is not a type of muffin that is substantially more notable than any other, to the extent that it warrants its own article, nor does the article appear to have much potential for expansion. The second point is not specific to the muffin and can be discussed in poppy seed in a more objective, generalized manner. On the third point, this article hangs its claim to notability, which means this article has an inherent systemic bias. Merging this content to muffin and poppy seed, with links between the two, will allow a less biased and more encyclopedic treatment of this topic. Ibadibam ( talk) 17:07, 12 May 2020 (UTC)