![]() | Polygon Man has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 26, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tintor2 ( talk · contribs) 19:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this article. Tintor2 ( talk) 19:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct:
(b) it complies with the
Manual of Style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that could
reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
(c) it contains
no original research:
(d) it contains no
copyright violations or
plagiarism:
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
(b) it stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style):
(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
(b) media are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
@ Kung Fu Man: Everything looking good but before passing it.
Hope I got everything there.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 23:20, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Good work. I'd trim video games more considering it doesn't really say anything about the thing. Tintor2 ( talk) 23:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Polygon Man has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 26, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tintor2 ( talk · contribs) 19:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this article. Tintor2 ( talk) 19:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct:
(b) it complies with the
Manual of Style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that could
reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
(c) it contains
no original research:
(d) it contains no
copyright violations or
plagiarism:
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
(b) it stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style):
(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
(b) media are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
@ Kung Fu Man: Everything looking good but before passing it.
Hope I got everything there.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 23:20, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Good work. I'd trim video games more considering it doesn't really say anything about the thing. Tintor2 ( talk) 23:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)