This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Police abolition movement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by
Yoninah (
talk)
11:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Created by Valereee ( talk). Self-nominated at 15:11, 7 June 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: LittleT889 ( talk) 13:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Should we just fail this? —valereee ( talk) 19:39, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Withdrawing nom. Thanks for the help and sorry for the work, all! :) —valereee ( talk) 10:42, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
We've got an edit war brewing. I would love to see the IP editor justify their changes, which appear to be original research. For example: "In making this claim, abolitionists usually do not address the role of the police in situational intervention in active incidents of violence" is unsupported by any citation, and the later cited source just supports the direct quote from Ritchie was not made in the context of commentary on active incidents of violence. Pinging editors who reverted the content, @ Mr.choppers and Dr vulpes; will drop a note at the IP's talk page. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 14:08, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Police abolition movement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by
Yoninah (
talk)
11:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Created by Valereee ( talk). Self-nominated at 15:11, 7 June 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: LittleT889 ( talk) 13:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Should we just fail this? —valereee ( talk) 19:39, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Withdrawing nom. Thanks for the help and sorry for the work, all! :) —valereee ( talk) 10:42, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
We've got an edit war brewing. I would love to see the IP editor justify their changes, which appear to be original research. For example: "In making this claim, abolitionists usually do not address the role of the police in situational intervention in active incidents of violence" is unsupported by any citation, and the later cited source just supports the direct quote from Ritchie was not made in the context of commentary on active incidents of violence. Pinging editors who reverted the content, @ Mr.choppers and Dr vulpes; will drop a note at the IP's talk page. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 14:08, 10 April 2023 (UTC)