![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unsourced info from Suk tribe:
— mark ✎ 08:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
I have made a few changes in this stub. The Pokot are not Kalenjin. This is a mistake made by the British who did not know how to 'classify' people. They preferred putting them within a group which is in itself a fabrication, more than a real family of ethnic groups. The affirmation that pokot and nandi belong to the same ethnic background is acceptable only if one agrees that Chinese and Algerian people belong to the same family. -- Beppevec ( talk) 12:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unsourced info from Suk tribe:
— mark ✎ 08:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
I have made a few changes in this stub. The Pokot are not Kalenjin. This is a mistake made by the British who did not know how to 'classify' people. They preferred putting them within a group which is in itself a fabrication, more than a real family of ethnic groups. The affirmation that pokot and nandi belong to the same ethnic background is acceptable only if one agrees that Chinese and Algerian people belong to the same family. -- Beppevec ( talk) 12:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)