This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Point-to-point construction article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Via a discussion on the Dr. Z forum it was indicated by some of the members that true point to point does not use toggle boards as indicated on this article but is instead just wired component to component in rather messy style. Can someone weigh in on this? Relevant link here: [1] Madness 01:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Update: Found a picture of true point to point wiring, scroll to the bottomish portion of the page. [2] Madness 01:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
This method is NOT just used for prototype equipment, or it this intro just badly written?. It is certainly not often used anymore, especially for 'domestic' electronics. Was used in specialised low run equipment and in some military applications, through personal experience.
Six years ago (2003) I was commercially manufacturing power supplies for Aeronautical Navigational Aids eg. DME, VOR and DVOR. These were old (but proven) designs, and had a relay, large capacitors and large transformers. Some of the wiring was connected with crimp lugs as the caps and relay had screw lugs.
The rest of the equipment was rackmounted and had large wiring harnesses connecting together many chassis' holding lots of PCB modules. Certainly that is also a form of point to point.
I know I'm being very picky, but an encylopedia has to be accurate. -- 220.101.28.25 ( talk) 06:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
This article seems to be confusing 2 distinct types of wiring.
First is what is called 'hard wired' here in the UK. This doesn't use any tagboards, large components are fixed in place, and small ones strung between them.
Second is the tagboard system, where most or all small components are mounted on tagboards, and wires run from these to the large mounted components.
Hybrids of the 2 methods have of course been used as well. 82.31.207.100 ( talk) 16:16, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
This picture linked here
Is not point to point wiring according to any definition.
It has nothing in common with the picture directly above it.
References to the picture and that type of construction as point to point needs to be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.195.136.86 ( talk) 02:54, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
there is no source for that picture other then that website. Point to point looks like this -> http://timeelect.com/51ampeg-18.jpg There is further information on this website. http://mhuss.com/AmpInfo/ Turret board construction developed after point to point construction. It is not the presence of terminals or solder lugs that determines the wiring classification. It is how the components are laid out and how lugs are used. The existing picture should be removed. The type of wiring depicted here http://www.chambonino.com/work/selmer/selm2n.jpg is clearly different from a turret board. -- unregistered — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.195.136.86 ( talk) 04:20, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Point-to-point construction. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Point-to-point construction article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Via a discussion on the Dr. Z forum it was indicated by some of the members that true point to point does not use toggle boards as indicated on this article but is instead just wired component to component in rather messy style. Can someone weigh in on this? Relevant link here: [1] Madness 01:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Update: Found a picture of true point to point wiring, scroll to the bottomish portion of the page. [2] Madness 01:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
This method is NOT just used for prototype equipment, or it this intro just badly written?. It is certainly not often used anymore, especially for 'domestic' electronics. Was used in specialised low run equipment and in some military applications, through personal experience.
Six years ago (2003) I was commercially manufacturing power supplies for Aeronautical Navigational Aids eg. DME, VOR and DVOR. These were old (but proven) designs, and had a relay, large capacitors and large transformers. Some of the wiring was connected with crimp lugs as the caps and relay had screw lugs.
The rest of the equipment was rackmounted and had large wiring harnesses connecting together many chassis' holding lots of PCB modules. Certainly that is also a form of point to point.
I know I'm being very picky, but an encylopedia has to be accurate. -- 220.101.28.25 ( talk) 06:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
This article seems to be confusing 2 distinct types of wiring.
First is what is called 'hard wired' here in the UK. This doesn't use any tagboards, large components are fixed in place, and small ones strung between them.
Second is the tagboard system, where most or all small components are mounted on tagboards, and wires run from these to the large mounted components.
Hybrids of the 2 methods have of course been used as well. 82.31.207.100 ( talk) 16:16, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
This picture linked here
Is not point to point wiring according to any definition.
It has nothing in common with the picture directly above it.
References to the picture and that type of construction as point to point needs to be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.195.136.86 ( talk) 02:54, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
there is no source for that picture other then that website. Point to point looks like this -> http://timeelect.com/51ampeg-18.jpg There is further information on this website. http://mhuss.com/AmpInfo/ Turret board construction developed after point to point construction. It is not the presence of terminals or solder lugs that determines the wiring classification. It is how the components are laid out and how lugs are used. The existing picture should be removed. The type of wiring depicted here http://www.chambonino.com/work/selmer/selm2n.jpg is clearly different from a turret board. -- unregistered — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.195.136.86 ( talk) 04:20, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Point-to-point construction. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)