This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Poedjangga Baroe has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 17, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in nine years of circulation, Indonesian literary magazine
Poedjangga Baroe had 125 employees or contributors but never more than 150 subscribers? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
Alright, I've finished my copyedit of the article, I thought it was in good shape, I saw few real mistakes. I mostly tried to tighten up the prose, my apologies if I overreached at all. These are my changes, you might want to check on any wikilinks I introduced. I noticed a number of the critics listed aren't linked, I assume they are fairly minor figures without articles? One issue that I thought I'd bring up:
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin ( talk · contribs) 19:24, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
I will review this article. At first glance it meets the GA criteria.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Poedjangga Baroe has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 17, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in nine years of circulation, Indonesian literary magazine
Poedjangga Baroe had 125 employees or contributors but never more than 150 subscribers? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
Alright, I've finished my copyedit of the article, I thought it was in good shape, I saw few real mistakes. I mostly tried to tighten up the prose, my apologies if I overreached at all. These are my changes, you might want to check on any wikilinks I introduced. I noticed a number of the critics listed aren't linked, I assume they are fairly minor figures without articles? One issue that I thought I'd bring up:
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin ( talk · contribs) 19:24, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
I will review this article. At first glance it meets the GA criteria.