From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flowers bracteate and usually small, arranged into inflorescences of various forms (except for genus Mayaca, which has solitary terminal flowers - this does not sound like a very easy and clear sentence. TeunSpaans 21:53, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This means that
  1. All Poales have bracteate and usually small flowers
  2. All Poales except Mayaca have inflorescences.
I don't know how to rephrase it better. Iorsh 12:28, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
What do you think about this change? TeunSpaans 19:37, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Looks good to me. Iorsh 20:56, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Why is the English Thurniaceae entry in Esperanto? SleekWeasel 23:53, 28 April 2006 (UTC) reply

Not as of 2018.-- Quisqualis ( talk) 17:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Proposed merge from Eriocaulales to Poales

  • Merge - Eriocaulales is an unreferenced stub of a minor historical taxon which is now synonymized to Poales. Poales has a section on the previous APG classifications that the Eriocaulales could easily be included. Nessie ( talk) 16:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Agree Vox Sciurorum ( talk) 14:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC) reply
  checkY  Merger complete. Klbrain ( talk) 16:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Proposed merge from Cyperales to Poales

  • Merge - Cyperales is a poorly referenced stub of a minor historical taxon which is now synonymized to Poales. Poales has a section on the previous APG classifications that the Cyperales could easily be included. Nessie ( talk) 16:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Agree Vox Sciurorum ( talk) 14:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC) reply
  checkY  Merger complete. Klbrain ( talk) 16:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flowers bracteate and usually small, arranged into inflorescences of various forms (except for genus Mayaca, which has solitary terminal flowers - this does not sound like a very easy and clear sentence. TeunSpaans 21:53, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This means that
  1. All Poales have bracteate and usually small flowers
  2. All Poales except Mayaca have inflorescences.
I don't know how to rephrase it better. Iorsh 12:28, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
What do you think about this change? TeunSpaans 19:37, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Looks good to me. Iorsh 20:56, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Why is the English Thurniaceae entry in Esperanto? SleekWeasel 23:53, 28 April 2006 (UTC) reply

Not as of 2018.-- Quisqualis ( talk) 17:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Proposed merge from Eriocaulales to Poales

  • Merge - Eriocaulales is an unreferenced stub of a minor historical taxon which is now synonymized to Poales. Poales has a section on the previous APG classifications that the Eriocaulales could easily be included. Nessie ( talk) 16:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Agree Vox Sciurorum ( talk) 14:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC) reply
  checkY  Merger complete. Klbrain ( talk) 16:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Proposed merge from Cyperales to Poales

  • Merge - Cyperales is a poorly referenced stub of a minor historical taxon which is now synonymized to Poales. Poales has a section on the previous APG classifications that the Cyperales could easily be included. Nessie ( talk) 16:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Agree Vox Sciurorum ( talk) 14:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC) reply
  checkY  Merger complete. Klbrain ( talk) 16:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook