![]() | Pinkeye (South Park) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | Pinkeye (South Park) is part of the South Park (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
So, what's the exact title of the episode, "Pinkeye" or "Pink Eye"? If you search for it you find both of them. 212.66.81.244 01:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Plot section repeats the phrase "much to the fury of" three times (and there is a "much to the shock and dismay of" at the end of the Production section. JmA ( talk) 03:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Image:Southpark ep107 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Cites please;
Alastairward ( talk) 12:48, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Does this article pass the notability test? Alastairward ( talk) 16:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
I meant that it passes, my bad. But you're going to need more than just me. The Video Game Master ( talk) 18:24, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
If you no one owns it, then WHAT GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO MERGE IT? I think it's notable because it gives a great summary over a great episode over a great show. And by great show, I mean popular and famous. Many people will know what it is if you talk about it with them, so therefore it is notable. Because people know about it and like looking/hearing at things about it. Case closed. The Video Game Master ( talk) 13:30, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
See This page to discuss about the merger. The disscusion has been moved to Talk:List of South Park episodes -- Gman124 talk 16:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Chef pulls that guy's arm off and then he bleeds to death. Like in the Stepehn King book IT. IT pulled the boy's arm off and he bled to death. Coincidence? I think it's a reference. 68.39.79.161 ( talk) 01:29, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
![]() | Pinkeye (South Park) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | Pinkeye (South Park) is part of the South Park (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
So, what's the exact title of the episode, "Pinkeye" or "Pink Eye"? If you search for it you find both of them. 212.66.81.244 01:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Plot section repeats the phrase "much to the fury of" three times (and there is a "much to the shock and dismay of" at the end of the Production section. JmA ( talk) 03:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Image:Southpark ep107 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Cites please;
Alastairward ( talk) 12:48, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Does this article pass the notability test? Alastairward ( talk) 16:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
I meant that it passes, my bad. But you're going to need more than just me. The Video Game Master ( talk) 18:24, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
If you no one owns it, then WHAT GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO MERGE IT? I think it's notable because it gives a great summary over a great episode over a great show. And by great show, I mean popular and famous. Many people will know what it is if you talk about it with them, so therefore it is notable. Because people know about it and like looking/hearing at things about it. Case closed. The Video Game Master ( talk) 13:30, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
See This page to discuss about the merger. The disscusion has been moved to Talk:List of South Park episodes -- Gman124 talk 16:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Chef pulls that guy's arm off and then he bleeds to death. Like in the Stepehn King book IT. IT pulled the boy's arm off and he bled to death. Coincidence? I think it's a reference. 68.39.79.161 ( talk) 01:29, 21 November 2009 (UTC)