![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Photomapping page were merged into Photogrammetry. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 June 2020 and 3 August 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
MikeJiang131.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 06:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Would Microsoft Live Labs Photosynth and Google Street View be considered examples of Photogrammetry applications? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.248.228.189 ( talk) 20:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
So, is it just me, or is there some major copyvio in this article with respect to "Introduction to Photogrammetry"? -- Gwern (contribs) 16:16 20 June 2008 (GMT)
This is an individual's opinion, not fact nor consensus. Photogrammetry forms the very foundation of so-called "Geomatics" (which itself is the fusion of geophysics, geography, engineering, geology, geodesy, surveying and computer science) and is constantly being used as more and more planet observation satellites are launched for remote sensing. Satellite stereo photogrammetry plays a crucial role in updating terrain maps (DTM, DEM), hydrology maps and furthering our knowledge of the geoid in great detail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mxbuck ( talk • contribs) 19:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, the section was clearly original research and entirely lacking in references or citations, so contributes nothing to a reader's understanding of the subject. No reason not to add it back if the claims can be substantiated, but as it stands it says nothing verifiable, so I deleted it. 82.6.108.62 ( talk) 17:15, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Should this article mention Photofly and how cloud computing is now allowing a wider audience to use photogrammetry?
195.70.93.15 ( talk) 08:59, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Should the table of software be moved to its own wiki page, e.g. "Comparison of Photogrammetry Software"? -- LeBoef ( talk) 09:38, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
I'm rather surprise to not see it here. It was actually the best online service I've come across when I was doing evaluations three years ago, and I doubt that they devolved since then. Here is their website for Areograph: http://areo.co.nz/areograph/ (Areoscan and Areohawk are (I'm assuming) extensions of AG.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeadlyDad ( talk • contribs) 16:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Huh? And why is so much of this in italics and bold? 15:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
There's a template for "lumberjack sports" at the bottom of the article, which does list photogrammetry. But this article doesn't discuss any competitive aspect(???) or lumberjacking, and lumberjack sports doesn't mention photogrammetry at all. What gives? — Gwalla | Talk 20:56, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Photogrammetry normally implies stereo, with very little work done on a single image, so there's no need for dedicated section for stereophotogrammetry -- otherwise, it'd need a pairing monophotogrammetry section -- so I plan to delete that section. Fgnievinski ( talk) 03:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
@ Kri: you might want to check these two categories, as they seem to overlap substantially. Fgnievinski ( talk) 18:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
The history of photogrammetry receives only passing mention in the article; only that 'it is as old as photography itself'. The discovery of photogrammetric techniques and methods and pioneer applications deserves a section in itself. I will start one, but, please, will need help from those of you more in the know. My interest in the field is as a photographer who has stumbled across field striations when overlapping stereo views which appeared to have applications in range finding, only to discover the existence of this whole fascinating discipline of photogrammetry which brings together trigonometry and photography. sinarau ( talk) 22:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Photogrammetry. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
@ Fgnievinski: It seems that this article now has several incomplete citations, since the references from the Photomapping article were not merged into this article. Can you finish merging the parts of the photomapping article that are omitted here? Jarble ( talk) 16:29, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Photomapping page were merged into Photogrammetry. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 June 2020 and 3 August 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
MikeJiang131.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 06:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Would Microsoft Live Labs Photosynth and Google Street View be considered examples of Photogrammetry applications? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.248.228.189 ( talk) 20:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
So, is it just me, or is there some major copyvio in this article with respect to "Introduction to Photogrammetry"? -- Gwern (contribs) 16:16 20 June 2008 (GMT)
This is an individual's opinion, not fact nor consensus. Photogrammetry forms the very foundation of so-called "Geomatics" (which itself is the fusion of geophysics, geography, engineering, geology, geodesy, surveying and computer science) and is constantly being used as more and more planet observation satellites are launched for remote sensing. Satellite stereo photogrammetry plays a crucial role in updating terrain maps (DTM, DEM), hydrology maps and furthering our knowledge of the geoid in great detail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mxbuck ( talk • contribs) 19:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, the section was clearly original research and entirely lacking in references or citations, so contributes nothing to a reader's understanding of the subject. No reason not to add it back if the claims can be substantiated, but as it stands it says nothing verifiable, so I deleted it. 82.6.108.62 ( talk) 17:15, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Should this article mention Photofly and how cloud computing is now allowing a wider audience to use photogrammetry?
195.70.93.15 ( talk) 08:59, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Should the table of software be moved to its own wiki page, e.g. "Comparison of Photogrammetry Software"? -- LeBoef ( talk) 09:38, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
I'm rather surprise to not see it here. It was actually the best online service I've come across when I was doing evaluations three years ago, and I doubt that they devolved since then. Here is their website for Areograph: http://areo.co.nz/areograph/ (Areoscan and Areohawk are (I'm assuming) extensions of AG.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeadlyDad ( talk • contribs) 16:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Huh? And why is so much of this in italics and bold? 15:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
There's a template for "lumberjack sports" at the bottom of the article, which does list photogrammetry. But this article doesn't discuss any competitive aspect(???) or lumberjacking, and lumberjack sports doesn't mention photogrammetry at all. What gives? — Gwalla | Talk 20:56, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Photogrammetry normally implies stereo, with very little work done on a single image, so there's no need for dedicated section for stereophotogrammetry -- otherwise, it'd need a pairing monophotogrammetry section -- so I plan to delete that section. Fgnievinski ( talk) 03:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
@ Kri: you might want to check these two categories, as they seem to overlap substantially. Fgnievinski ( talk) 18:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
The history of photogrammetry receives only passing mention in the article; only that 'it is as old as photography itself'. The discovery of photogrammetric techniques and methods and pioneer applications deserves a section in itself. I will start one, but, please, will need help from those of you more in the know. My interest in the field is as a photographer who has stumbled across field striations when overlapping stereo views which appeared to have applications in range finding, only to discover the existence of this whole fascinating discipline of photogrammetry which brings together trigonometry and photography. sinarau ( talk) 22:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Photogrammetry. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
@ Fgnievinski: It seems that this article now has several incomplete citations, since the references from the Photomapping article were not merged into this article. Can you finish merging the parts of the photomapping article that are omitted here? Jarble ( talk) 16:29, 10 June 2019 (UTC)