 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I suggest this page be flagged as a stub. Not only is there MASSIVE amounts of information missing, the article doesnt even mention what they were created for & their need for the war.
This article is nothing but a listing of a few known locations, which is not near as important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:1003:C2EF:F81C:C57B:5759:6208 ( talk) 22:09, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
ambiguity in [link to, the article about] caissons
In the article, the phrase "set of reinforced concrete caissons constructed by civil engineering contractors" contains a hyper link that is ambiguous. I would be happy to "bypass" the disambiguation page, by changing the link to one that goes directly to the correct destination; but first I would have to know (find out) which article is the correct destination page. (any advice?) Thanks, -- Mike Schwartz ( talk) 00:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's OK, I've done it - the link now goes to Caisson (engineering). Ian Dunster ( talk) 21:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
why were they "collected and sunk" in the UK? seems weird. before the invasion you mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Feldercarb ( talk • contribs) 04:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Apologies but I'm just going to leave this here since I don't have time to edit... there's a link with more locations of Caissons extant in the UK. Current list in article is incomplete. https://historicengland.org.uk/whats-new/news/phoenix-caisson-in-kent-designated-part-of-the-mulberry-floating-harbour-used-in-the-d-day-landings/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silverneko ( talk • contribs) 00:05, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I suggest this page be flagged as a stub. Not only is there MASSIVE amounts of information missing, the article doesnt even mention what they were created for & their need for the war.
This article is nothing but a listing of a few known locations, which is not near as important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:1003:C2EF:F81C:C57B:5759:6208 ( talk) 22:09, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
ambiguity in [link to, the article about] caissons
In the article, the phrase "set of reinforced concrete caissons constructed by civil engineering contractors" contains a hyper link that is ambiguous. I would be happy to "bypass" the disambiguation page, by changing the link to one that goes directly to the correct destination; but first I would have to know (find out) which article is the correct destination page. (any advice?) Thanks, -- Mike Schwartz ( talk) 00:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's OK, I've done it - the link now goes to Caisson (engineering). Ian Dunster ( talk) 21:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
why were they "collected and sunk" in the UK? seems weird. before the invasion you mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Feldercarb ( talk • contribs) 04:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Apologies but I'm just going to leave this here since I don't have time to edit... there's a link with more locations of Caissons extant in the UK. Current list in article is incomplete. https://historicengland.org.uk/whats-new/news/phoenix-caisson-in-kent-designated-part-of-the-mulberry-floating-harbour-used-in-the-d-day-landings/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silverneko ( talk • contribs) 00:05, 30 September 2018 (UTC)