From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

???

Is this movie real? It was supposed to be on video in december.-- Aeom Mai 22:41, 12 April 2006 (UTC) reply


It's real and its one of the best movies I've ever seen!!

RIP OFF

this films plot is identical to lock stock and two smoking barrels (british film) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.16.160.17 ( talk) 18:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Too many similarities to be original.

Yes indeed its too much of a coincidence for the plot to be original. Or if in doubt, compare the plot analysis with Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels and make your own informed decision yourself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhanzhao ( talkcontribs) 02:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply

OK - there is a source so I wrote that it is a remake. Shahid Talk2me 07:42, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Should it be titled as a remake though? It is a direct rip-off and should be noted as plagiarised. A remake is sanctioned by the studio that put the original movie out in the first place. Calling it a remake is misleading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.203.99 ( talk) 17:40, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply


_____________> i noted the similarities the main page but somebody deleted it...!!!!!!!!!!!! something going on here.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay.yours ( talkcontribs) 11:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

???

Is this movie real? It was supposed to be on video in december.-- Aeom Mai 22:41, 12 April 2006 (UTC) reply


It's real and its one of the best movies I've ever seen!!

RIP OFF

this films plot is identical to lock stock and two smoking barrels (british film) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.16.160.17 ( talk) 18:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Too many similarities to be original.

Yes indeed its too much of a coincidence for the plot to be original. Or if in doubt, compare the plot analysis with Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels and make your own informed decision yourself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhanzhao ( talkcontribs) 02:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply

OK - there is a source so I wrote that it is a remake. Shahid Talk2me 07:42, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Should it be titled as a remake though? It is a direct rip-off and should be noted as plagiarised. A remake is sanctioned by the studio that put the original movie out in the first place. Calling it a remake is misleading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.203.99 ( talk) 17:40, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply


_____________> i noted the similarities the main page but somebody deleted it...!!!!!!!!!!!! something going on here.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay.yours ( talkcontribs) 11:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook