![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article says that this movie "will premiere June 17, 2011". Where is a source for this? Me and some others are currently discussing opening this up to an AfD, and having a set release date would lean me towards keep. However, we cannot find a reliable source for the claimed release date. ~ Baron Von Yiffington . talk . contribs 01:05, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
A little late, but it was told at Comic-Con that it would release on August 17 2011. Don't touch the sides! Butterfingers! ( talk) 20:04, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
People are now saying that the movie will premiere June 24th, 2011. Who confirmed this? What is the source? This should not be on the page without a source because now people don't know if it's true or not. Please fix this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farmward821 ( talk • contribs) 03:15, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
The release date is now August 5th, 2011. Is this true? And where is the source? 99.191.112.209 ( talk) 15:17, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Shrek Forever After was not the first Movie/TV Show to have a twisted alternate universe. If anything it should be credited to "It's a Wonderful Life"! 75.68.52.240 ( talk) 18:15, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Kim Possible: A Sitch in Time was a Disney Channel movie...it was not considered a Disney Channel ORIGNIAL movie (DCOM) Also, The Proud Family Movie came out after Kim Possible: So the Drama
Is it really true that Ella finally tells Phineas how much she likes him? 09MurphyM ( talk) 20:40, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
They kiss, right before the amnesia-intro is fired. Surprising that Ella would do that, but I'm guessing the only thing that motivated OWCA was the whole "Perry/Agent P." thing, and had nothing to do with [Phinaella ] [ User:Walex03|Walex03]]. Talking, working, friending. 16:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
M Sorry, but why is source #4 from a fan wiki???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.200.36.40 ( talk) 00:31, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This page/info/en/?search=Help:Using_talk_pages should be renamed Phineas and Ella Palangi the movie : Across the 2nd Dimension.The logo uses 2nd rather than Second. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.108.196.243 ( talk) 04:55, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
I moved this article from Phineas and Ella palangi the Movie: Across the 2nd Dimension to Phineas and Ferb the Movie per WP:SUBTITLES ("Usually, a Wikipedia article on a book (or other medium, such as a movie, TV special or video game) does not include its subtitle in the Wikipedia page name.") - there do not seem to be any other films in the series, and both IMDb and the official Disney website just call it "Phineas and Ferb the Movie". It was moved back with the explanation "The film is never referred to as just "Phineas and Ferb the Movie" it is referred to as just "Across the 2nd Dimension"" - if that's an argument for WP:COMMONNAME, shouldn't it be moved to Across the 2nd Dimension instead? -- McGeddon ( talk) 08:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
It makes no sense to not include the second dimension in the title. The film has never been referred to as just Phineas and Ferb the Movie. There is a reason that the word "usually" is used in WP:SUBTITLE. This is one of the times when they should be included. JDDJS ( talk) 17:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Why are articles here used as refrence are mostly bare url.I think these should be removed.-- Muneeb Reply me on my talk page See my contributions 14:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was moved. -- BDD ( talk) 17:47, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Phineas and Ferb the Movie → Phineas and Ferb the Movie: Across the 2nd Dimension – Honestly, I do not know what kind of idiot who would move Phineas and Ferb the Movie: Across the 2nd Dimension, to Phineas and Ferb the Movie. Through all of the sources around, including Disney Channel, that is not the full title of the TV movie. I would just like to request for someone to revert a stupid move that someone did, and bring it back to the way it was before, because obviously it was the fine the way it is, and someone tried to ruin it for all of us, and that's just so disappointing. --Relisted. Steel1943 ( talk) 08:03, 7 November 2013 (UTC) Blurred Lines 01:47, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
The lead section needs a complete rewrite. It immediately gets bogged down in dry statistics and tells the reader nothing about the subject of the article. — Quicksilver T @ 17:40, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article says that this movie "will premiere June 17, 2011". Where is a source for this? Me and some others are currently discussing opening this up to an AfD, and having a set release date would lean me towards keep. However, we cannot find a reliable source for the claimed release date. ~ Baron Von Yiffington . talk . contribs 01:05, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
A little late, but it was told at Comic-Con that it would release on August 17 2011. Don't touch the sides! Butterfingers! ( talk) 20:04, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
People are now saying that the movie will premiere June 24th, 2011. Who confirmed this? What is the source? This should not be on the page without a source because now people don't know if it's true or not. Please fix this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farmward821 ( talk • contribs) 03:15, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
The release date is now August 5th, 2011. Is this true? And where is the source? 99.191.112.209 ( talk) 15:17, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Shrek Forever After was not the first Movie/TV Show to have a twisted alternate universe. If anything it should be credited to "It's a Wonderful Life"! 75.68.52.240 ( talk) 18:15, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Kim Possible: A Sitch in Time was a Disney Channel movie...it was not considered a Disney Channel ORIGNIAL movie (DCOM) Also, The Proud Family Movie came out after Kim Possible: So the Drama
Is it really true that Ella finally tells Phineas how much she likes him? 09MurphyM ( talk) 20:40, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
They kiss, right before the amnesia-intro is fired. Surprising that Ella would do that, but I'm guessing the only thing that motivated OWCA was the whole "Perry/Agent P." thing, and had nothing to do with [Phinaella ] [ User:Walex03|Walex03]]. Talking, working, friending. 16:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
M Sorry, but why is source #4 from a fan wiki???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.200.36.40 ( talk) 00:31, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This page/info/en/?search=Help:Using_talk_pages should be renamed Phineas and Ella Palangi the movie : Across the 2nd Dimension.The logo uses 2nd rather than Second. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.108.196.243 ( talk) 04:55, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
I moved this article from Phineas and Ella palangi the Movie: Across the 2nd Dimension to Phineas and Ferb the Movie per WP:SUBTITLES ("Usually, a Wikipedia article on a book (or other medium, such as a movie, TV special or video game) does not include its subtitle in the Wikipedia page name.") - there do not seem to be any other films in the series, and both IMDb and the official Disney website just call it "Phineas and Ferb the Movie". It was moved back with the explanation "The film is never referred to as just "Phineas and Ferb the Movie" it is referred to as just "Across the 2nd Dimension"" - if that's an argument for WP:COMMONNAME, shouldn't it be moved to Across the 2nd Dimension instead? -- McGeddon ( talk) 08:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
It makes no sense to not include the second dimension in the title. The film has never been referred to as just Phineas and Ferb the Movie. There is a reason that the word "usually" is used in WP:SUBTITLE. This is one of the times when they should be included. JDDJS ( talk) 17:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Why are articles here used as refrence are mostly bare url.I think these should be removed.-- Muneeb Reply me on my talk page See my contributions 14:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was moved. -- BDD ( talk) 17:47, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Phineas and Ferb the Movie → Phineas and Ferb the Movie: Across the 2nd Dimension – Honestly, I do not know what kind of idiot who would move Phineas and Ferb the Movie: Across the 2nd Dimension, to Phineas and Ferb the Movie. Through all of the sources around, including Disney Channel, that is not the full title of the TV movie. I would just like to request for someone to revert a stupid move that someone did, and bring it back to the way it was before, because obviously it was the fine the way it is, and someone tried to ruin it for all of us, and that's just so disappointing. --Relisted. Steel1943 ( talk) 08:03, 7 November 2013 (UTC) Blurred Lines 01:47, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
The lead section needs a complete rewrite. It immediately gets bogged down in dry statistics and tells the reader nothing about the subject of the article. — Quicksilver T @ 17:40, 23 September 2014 (UTC)