This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This description is based on the one given by Cambridge Journals Online here:
Can this be really considered as "promotional"? It looks to me as simply a fair summary of the content of the journal. The website also describes it as "one of the leading academic journals of philosophy" which I personally think is also true, but might be considered as promotional.
And how can "Recent contributors have included Michael Dummett, Noam Chomsky, Jurgen Habermas, David Wiggins and Mary Warnock" be considered "promotional"? Martinevans123 ( talk) 20:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This description is based on the one given by Cambridge Journals Online here:
Can this be really considered as "promotional"? It looks to me as simply a fair summary of the content of the journal. The website also describes it as "one of the leading academic journals of philosophy" which I personally think is also true, but might be considered as promotional.
And how can "Recent contributors have included Michael Dummett, Noam Chomsky, Jurgen Habermas, David Wiggins and Mary Warnock" be considered "promotional"? Martinevans123 ( talk) 20:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)