This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The word Judeophile/Judeophillia should link to this page when entered in the search bar. I don't know how to do that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.91.144.11 ( talk) 03:34, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
The proselytes of the Roman era should be mentioned here, but I don't know much about them -- Error
I've added the above to the article--Google is a great re-search engine as well (as a search engine).
None of the cited authors have a WP pahe?
I am a gentile, who found the word here accidentally on a search. I like the word and consider myself one; I am in awe the history of the Jewish People, their determination and survival. I am aware of and appreciate Jewish contributions to jazz and science, to name a few. I believe, however, that the previous version misses a target audience, that of Gentiles, and have made minor (I believe) edits to the first paragraph, to reflect that. I didn’t feel right about checking the ‘minor’ box, though, and didn’t.
Misc other comments: Para2, I could not link to the referenced Commentary opinion. Para3, I know little specific about it, but I find the statement ‘His detractor Norman Finkelstein agrees’, to be incomprehensible unless an explanation is added. Para4, nothing. Para5, last sentence, If by this you mean the "Righteous Among the Nations" and similar people, at various historic times, then I believe their role could be better highlighted in a more complete narative of the historic context of the word. The titles of the first three books would tend to support this view. I think deletion of 'so called' would be appropriate. CasualObserver'48 ( talk) 09:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
I think this article should be AfD'd. This term is a non-notable neologism; On the Islamophilia page I made a joke about having a wikipedia page called this as well, then I was shocked to see such a page actually existed. Do we really need an encyclopedia page for every bizarre compound word that someone uses in passing, when there is no clear history of scholarly literature specifically discussing the term or phrase as a meaningful construct? csloat ( talk) 21:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Nietzsche didn't declare his love for all things Jewish. instead his anti-anti-semitism was directed at Jew-haters and the kind of people who were Jew-haters. they are two different things. one might very well be indifferent to Jews and Jewish culture but also hate anti-semitism, after all, although i wouldn't go so far as to claim that Nietzsche was indifferent to Jews and Jewish culture. but many of his seemingly philosemitic statements are actually merely jabs at anti-semites and in particular the kinds of backward nationalist Germanophile xenophobic statist morons who were also anti-semites in Nietzsche's time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.29.203 ( talk) 23:28, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
This article articulates the liberal view, but not the conservative evangelical view, particularly those of Christian Zionists. This article should be expanded to include this. -- Confession0791 talk 23:31, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
There are more specific sections of philosemitism. Article expansion? -- Houdinipeter talk 22:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
There's one reference in the "Jewish response" section, and it goes to theforward.com and says "editorial" without linking to the actual editorial, so it's very unclear what the actual Jewish response is. Likely needs a whole rewrite! -- Prince Ludwig ( talk) 19:23, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
First line of the article, uhm, that seems rather contradictory. 2001:818:E970:4100:5190:C869:C05E:23B9 ( talk) 11:18, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The word Judeophile/Judeophillia should link to this page when entered in the search bar. I don't know how to do that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.91.144.11 ( talk) 03:34, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
The proselytes of the Roman era should be mentioned here, but I don't know much about them -- Error
I've added the above to the article--Google is a great re-search engine as well (as a search engine).
None of the cited authors have a WP pahe?
I am a gentile, who found the word here accidentally on a search. I like the word and consider myself one; I am in awe the history of the Jewish People, their determination and survival. I am aware of and appreciate Jewish contributions to jazz and science, to name a few. I believe, however, that the previous version misses a target audience, that of Gentiles, and have made minor (I believe) edits to the first paragraph, to reflect that. I didn’t feel right about checking the ‘minor’ box, though, and didn’t.
Misc other comments: Para2, I could not link to the referenced Commentary opinion. Para3, I know little specific about it, but I find the statement ‘His detractor Norman Finkelstein agrees’, to be incomprehensible unless an explanation is added. Para4, nothing. Para5, last sentence, If by this you mean the "Righteous Among the Nations" and similar people, at various historic times, then I believe their role could be better highlighted in a more complete narative of the historic context of the word. The titles of the first three books would tend to support this view. I think deletion of 'so called' would be appropriate. CasualObserver'48 ( talk) 09:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
I think this article should be AfD'd. This term is a non-notable neologism; On the Islamophilia page I made a joke about having a wikipedia page called this as well, then I was shocked to see such a page actually existed. Do we really need an encyclopedia page for every bizarre compound word that someone uses in passing, when there is no clear history of scholarly literature specifically discussing the term or phrase as a meaningful construct? csloat ( talk) 21:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Nietzsche didn't declare his love for all things Jewish. instead his anti-anti-semitism was directed at Jew-haters and the kind of people who were Jew-haters. they are two different things. one might very well be indifferent to Jews and Jewish culture but also hate anti-semitism, after all, although i wouldn't go so far as to claim that Nietzsche was indifferent to Jews and Jewish culture. but many of his seemingly philosemitic statements are actually merely jabs at anti-semites and in particular the kinds of backward nationalist Germanophile xenophobic statist morons who were also anti-semites in Nietzsche's time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.29.203 ( talk) 23:28, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
This article articulates the liberal view, but not the conservative evangelical view, particularly those of Christian Zionists. This article should be expanded to include this. -- Confession0791 talk 23:31, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
There are more specific sections of philosemitism. Article expansion? -- Houdinipeter talk 22:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
There's one reference in the "Jewish response" section, and it goes to theforward.com and says "editorial" without linking to the actual editorial, so it's very unclear what the actual Jewish response is. Likely needs a whole rewrite! -- Prince Ludwig ( talk) 19:23, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
First line of the article, uhm, that seems rather contradictory. 2001:818:E970:4100:5190:C869:C05E:23B9 ( talk) 11:18, 13 December 2023 (UTC)