This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm sorry, but this article already exists. You can see for you yourself if you don't believe me. Peter Rabbit (2018 film) Superchunk22 ( talk) 23:00, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Can yall please help me out with fixing this please dont delete it Jstar367 ( talk) 16:24, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
We've got a source that this is an American film. There have yet to be any sources presented that explicitly label it as Australian. The latest source cited merely says that one of the production companies is Australian. It is original research to label the film itself as Australian just because one of the production companies is Australian. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 23:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Also original research, but I stopped watching the film after about 20 minutes because although the voices and setting are English, the feel is of a Hollywood movie, specifically what I did not want to see. I was surprised not to see any mention of this in the reception-section. There is even a stab at English English with "tomayto tomahto, potayto, potahto". More appropriate would have been something like "rather rether, father fether". :) DirkvdM ( talk) 14:45, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Can anyone add a source that Sony Pictures Animation is involved with the film? — FilmandTVFan28 ( talk) 01:30, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change Matt Lucas to Colin Moody for the voice of Benjamin Bunny Jessiesimmonds ( talk) 15:41, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please Update Rotten Tomatoes. 61% With 23 Reviews And 5.9 Average. 143.112.144.129 ( talk) 19:03, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Could you please either provide a detailed plot or at least set up a plot expansion template? Also, there have been reports that Colin Moody, and not Matt Lucas, voices Benjamin Bunny. https://apnews.com/cffe00bd9aa34fb79fba07e9439f615b/Review:-Earnest-'Peter-Rabbit'-sure-to-delight-young-fans 72.36.113.20 ( talk) 05:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
It's already Satuday, and a plot has not been added. Could someone please expand the plot section? Znelson2 ( talk) 17:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
I'm wary of adding this yet per WP:NOTNEWS, so I'll leave it here for the moment: the Guardian is reporting on a petition and boycott of the film over its treatment of people who have food allergies. It seems prudent to wait until Sony responds. ~dom Kaos~ ( talk) 11:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Is Josephine Rabbit their mother's name in the film?
What about their father?
ArchAngelAvenger ( talk) 01:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Does anybody know the name of the child actor that played a little boy that eats a dollhouse pillow up as one of Thomas McGregor's customers in "Peter Rabbit"? I know for a fact that he is also in another movie or so, and not to mention some TV shows, and commercials and ads as well.
Geraldo Perez. I Am Sure That You Have Misinterpreted Comment Of TropicAces. If Box Office Millions Is Whole Number Then .0 Is Not Necessary. However If Not It Needs A Decimal Point. IUpdateRottenTomatoes ( talk) 17:46, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
The number of decimal places should be consistent within a list or context- the context here being the same info in different places in the same article. For box office numbers under 100 million display to tenth is likely best, though. I also expect to see rounding done correctly as a recent edit seems to imply that is not necessary for some reason or unless there is some project level consensus that someone can point me to that requires truncation of this data instead of rounding and that overrides the MOS for display of large numbers. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 18:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2601:8C:C300:3D5D:3CD8:3439:D29E:ADAF ( talk) 23:20, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
The first two of the three paragraphs under Box Office imply that anywhere in the world that is not the USA or Canada is simply "other territories". (Despite the fact that a majority of the income has come from those apparently lesser places.) OK, there is some correction in the third and final paragraph, but this is an appalling example of US (& Canadian) centrism in this global encyclopaedia. How about putting global figures first? And de-emphasising the US and Canada just a tiny bit. HiLo48 ( talk) 23:02, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Were is Lily bobtail? Googleboy587 ( talk) 06:21, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
The consistent comparison of the rabbit to the mouse. Snoiled ( talk) 08:19, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
I have been reverted [1] and asked to discuss it. I added a review from Mark Kermode to the Critical response section.
Mark Kermode is one of the most reputable British critics (if not the most [2]). This film is based on British books, and the lead voice is played by a British actor. I would say it was reasonable to include his reviews in any film article, but particularly any film article with a British connection. (I think the reason his reviews are not used more often is that it is easier to reference print reviews, and he delivers only some of his reviews in print, usually for the Guardian newspaper). The trailer received a lot of criticism, particularly from British critics, as the film was clearly not in keeping with the books.
In his review Mark Kermode panned the film and said that no only would fans of the book be appalled (and it was a bit of a hyperbolic hatchet-job) he suggested anyone who could read would be appalled. (He also questioned why the film associated itself with the book at all, instead of making making an unrelated film about some other a cheeky rabbit). This echoes the earlier sentiments about the film not being in any way faithful to the books.
Kermode also called Corden "appallingly irritating", which very unusually elicited a letter of complaint from Corden's father, a regular listener to the radio show (also podcast) where Kermode does most of his reviews. Other critics described Corden as miscast, this is the same said more emphatically. I understand there might be some need to copyedit but I do not accept that a review from respected critic should be excluded entirely, and the revert deleted the review completely. (The review is coherent and reasonable, unlike the borderline trolling from Rex Reed that people see fit to include in some articles.)
If you think changes are necessary then please discuss what those changes might be. If you think the review should not be included at all, then please explain why? -- 109.76.137.4 ( talk) 21:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
In the cartoon, no one just smiles like that. And this is so in Russian. Laughing for no reason is a sign of foolishness.
I think we need to make a Peter rabbit 3 2600:100C:B238:FC81:11A:3440:503F:A650 ( talk) 19:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm sorry, but this article already exists. You can see for you yourself if you don't believe me. Peter Rabbit (2018 film) Superchunk22 ( talk) 23:00, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Can yall please help me out with fixing this please dont delete it Jstar367 ( talk) 16:24, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
We've got a source that this is an American film. There have yet to be any sources presented that explicitly label it as Australian. The latest source cited merely says that one of the production companies is Australian. It is original research to label the film itself as Australian just because one of the production companies is Australian. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 23:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Also original research, but I stopped watching the film after about 20 minutes because although the voices and setting are English, the feel is of a Hollywood movie, specifically what I did not want to see. I was surprised not to see any mention of this in the reception-section. There is even a stab at English English with "tomayto tomahto, potayto, potahto". More appropriate would have been something like "rather rether, father fether". :) DirkvdM ( talk) 14:45, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Can anyone add a source that Sony Pictures Animation is involved with the film? — FilmandTVFan28 ( talk) 01:30, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change Matt Lucas to Colin Moody for the voice of Benjamin Bunny Jessiesimmonds ( talk) 15:41, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please Update Rotten Tomatoes. 61% With 23 Reviews And 5.9 Average. 143.112.144.129 ( talk) 19:03, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Could you please either provide a detailed plot or at least set up a plot expansion template? Also, there have been reports that Colin Moody, and not Matt Lucas, voices Benjamin Bunny. https://apnews.com/cffe00bd9aa34fb79fba07e9439f615b/Review:-Earnest-'Peter-Rabbit'-sure-to-delight-young-fans 72.36.113.20 ( talk) 05:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
It's already Satuday, and a plot has not been added. Could someone please expand the plot section? Znelson2 ( talk) 17:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
I'm wary of adding this yet per WP:NOTNEWS, so I'll leave it here for the moment: the Guardian is reporting on a petition and boycott of the film over its treatment of people who have food allergies. It seems prudent to wait until Sony responds. ~dom Kaos~ ( talk) 11:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Is Josephine Rabbit their mother's name in the film?
What about their father?
ArchAngelAvenger ( talk) 01:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Does anybody know the name of the child actor that played a little boy that eats a dollhouse pillow up as one of Thomas McGregor's customers in "Peter Rabbit"? I know for a fact that he is also in another movie or so, and not to mention some TV shows, and commercials and ads as well.
Geraldo Perez. I Am Sure That You Have Misinterpreted Comment Of TropicAces. If Box Office Millions Is Whole Number Then .0 Is Not Necessary. However If Not It Needs A Decimal Point. IUpdateRottenTomatoes ( talk) 17:46, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
The number of decimal places should be consistent within a list or context- the context here being the same info in different places in the same article. For box office numbers under 100 million display to tenth is likely best, though. I also expect to see rounding done correctly as a recent edit seems to imply that is not necessary for some reason or unless there is some project level consensus that someone can point me to that requires truncation of this data instead of rounding and that overrides the MOS for display of large numbers. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 18:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2601:8C:C300:3D5D:3CD8:3439:D29E:ADAF ( talk) 23:20, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
The first two of the three paragraphs under Box Office imply that anywhere in the world that is not the USA or Canada is simply "other territories". (Despite the fact that a majority of the income has come from those apparently lesser places.) OK, there is some correction in the third and final paragraph, but this is an appalling example of US (& Canadian) centrism in this global encyclopaedia. How about putting global figures first? And de-emphasising the US and Canada just a tiny bit. HiLo48 ( talk) 23:02, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Were is Lily bobtail? Googleboy587 ( talk) 06:21, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
The consistent comparison of the rabbit to the mouse. Snoiled ( talk) 08:19, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
I have been reverted [1] and asked to discuss it. I added a review from Mark Kermode to the Critical response section.
Mark Kermode is one of the most reputable British critics (if not the most [2]). This film is based on British books, and the lead voice is played by a British actor. I would say it was reasonable to include his reviews in any film article, but particularly any film article with a British connection. (I think the reason his reviews are not used more often is that it is easier to reference print reviews, and he delivers only some of his reviews in print, usually for the Guardian newspaper). The trailer received a lot of criticism, particularly from British critics, as the film was clearly not in keeping with the books.
In his review Mark Kermode panned the film and said that no only would fans of the book be appalled (and it was a bit of a hyperbolic hatchet-job) he suggested anyone who could read would be appalled. (He also questioned why the film associated itself with the book at all, instead of making making an unrelated film about some other a cheeky rabbit). This echoes the earlier sentiments about the film not being in any way faithful to the books.
Kermode also called Corden "appallingly irritating", which very unusually elicited a letter of complaint from Corden's father, a regular listener to the radio show (also podcast) where Kermode does most of his reviews. Other critics described Corden as miscast, this is the same said more emphatically. I understand there might be some need to copyedit but I do not accept that a review from respected critic should be excluded entirely, and the revert deleted the review completely. (The review is coherent and reasonable, unlike the borderline trolling from Rex Reed that people see fit to include in some articles.)
If you think changes are necessary then please discuss what those changes might be. If you think the review should not be included at all, then please explain why? -- 109.76.137.4 ( talk) 21:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
In the cartoon, no one just smiles like that. And this is so in Russian. Laughing for no reason is a sign of foolishness.
I think we need to make a Peter rabbit 3 2600:100C:B238:FC81:11A:3440:503F:A650 ( talk) 19:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)