From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been incorrectly labeled as a copyright violation. The user references the description of the company from a joint press release involving the company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.34.35.201 ( talkcontribs)

Is the press release GFDL, then? It says Copyright © 2006 Fair Isaac Corporation. All rights reserved. Pseudomonas 14:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC) reply

The press release content does not apply to the bios of a company. Fair Isaac Corporation doesn't retain copyright over Perrone Robotics' bio. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.34.35.201 ( talkcontribs)

Who does hold the copyright, then, given that it wasn't an original work by a Wikipedia editor? Pseudomonas 21:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC) reply
You're acknowledging that you don't know who owns the copyright or even if there is one. Yet you've flagged it as a copyright violation. The page should thus be restored until such time that a copyright violation is correctly identified or any potential copyright owner (if anybody this would be Perrone Robotics) indicates otherwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.35.35.201 ( talkcontribs)
Pardon my elipsis. What I meant was Who do you think does hold the copyright, then, given that it wasn't [&c]. Pseudomonas 15:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Facts: 1) You've flagged the page as a copyright violation; 2) You don't know who owns the copyright; 3) You don't know if there is a copyright for the bio; and 4) You're speculating that there is a copyright for the bio. Conclusions: 1) There is no proof that the posting was a copyright violation; 2) Fair-Isaac Corporation clearly does not own the copyright of another company's bio; 3) Anyone can speculate that there is a copyright violation for every single page on Wiki; 4) It is not helpful and it is in fact destructive to the Wiki community to randomly speculate on whether or not there is a copyright violation for a page; and 5) The page should be re-established. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.35.35.201 ( talkcontribs)

A new company description with external links was provided here on the temp page to be restored for the company page: Perrone Robotics Page to be Restored.

New company description restored sans any previous material.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been incorrectly labeled as a copyright violation. The user references the description of the company from a joint press release involving the company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.34.35.201 ( talkcontribs)

Is the press release GFDL, then? It says Copyright © 2006 Fair Isaac Corporation. All rights reserved. Pseudomonas 14:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC) reply

The press release content does not apply to the bios of a company. Fair Isaac Corporation doesn't retain copyright over Perrone Robotics' bio. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.34.35.201 ( talkcontribs)

Who does hold the copyright, then, given that it wasn't an original work by a Wikipedia editor? Pseudomonas 21:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC) reply
You're acknowledging that you don't know who owns the copyright or even if there is one. Yet you've flagged it as a copyright violation. The page should thus be restored until such time that a copyright violation is correctly identified or any potential copyright owner (if anybody this would be Perrone Robotics) indicates otherwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.35.35.201 ( talkcontribs)
Pardon my elipsis. What I meant was Who do you think does hold the copyright, then, given that it wasn't [&c]. Pseudomonas 15:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Facts: 1) You've flagged the page as a copyright violation; 2) You don't know who owns the copyright; 3) You don't know if there is a copyright for the bio; and 4) You're speculating that there is a copyright for the bio. Conclusions: 1) There is no proof that the posting was a copyright violation; 2) Fair-Isaac Corporation clearly does not own the copyright of another company's bio; 3) Anyone can speculate that there is a copyright violation for every single page on Wiki; 4) It is not helpful and it is in fact destructive to the Wiki community to randomly speculate on whether or not there is a copyright violation for a page; and 5) The page should be re-established. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.35.35.201 ( talkcontribs)

A new company description with external links was provided here on the temp page to be restored for the company page: Perrone Robotics Page to be Restored.

New company description restored sans any previous material.


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook