This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Aesthetics / Ancient Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Aesthetics Ancient philosophy Literature This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

// so... when in doubt steal it from reference.com, huh? very original.

-jp.

They took it from here, with a note to that effect. And that's fine. Haukur ( talk) 07:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Should we really have a full-fledged literary analysis of Othello in an encyclopedia article? I can understand using an example from Shakespeare, but this is a bit much. Bkwrmgrl1 ( talk) 01:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC) reply

I agree that it is too much. Bamkin ( talk) 23:04, 16 March 2008 (UTC) reply

why is it this the word should be broken up to sound it out —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.109.225.58 ( talk) 22:19, 24 August 2008 (UTC) reply

I think that the Othello example was taken too far. May I see permission to delete it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.186.52.159 ( talk) 15:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply

I think that the stuff on Peter Szondi is too detailed and a bit off-topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.123.240.38 ( talk) 16:21, 29 October 2011 (UTC) reply

The first sentence mentions "reversal of circumstances" but I am not sure if this is bad -> good, or good -> bad or can it be either?  — Preceding 
unsigned comment added by 
203.41.222.1 (
talk) 02:15, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
reply 

Currently the pronunciation (IPA) guide is /ˌpɛrəpɨˈtaɪ.ə/. Why is there "ai" instead of what should be a long 'a' (Japanese ei) sound? I've studied multiple languages, including ancient Greek, and this does not seem to be the likely pronunciation. - Cyborg Ninja 20:26, 23 July 2013 (UTC) reply