This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Any official word on whether this magazine was the inspiration for the name? I assume that it is.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.2.124.11 ( talk) 18:42, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
I don't really think Young Man (King of Animals) resembles Yugi Mutou, other than his necklace/amulet. Is there a closer analog to a different anime character?
Same goes for me, he doesn't... if they wanted that they would have made it more obvious... -- FlareNUKE 07:31, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Eh, if you ask me, he's a mismash of random Anime Characters. The Commander of animals thing could be a pokemon Refrence, and his suit kind of looks Like Spike's from Cowboy Bebop, albiet Spikes was blue, and didn't sparkle.
I don't think he's any anime character, just a stereotypicial anime guy...-- FlareNUKE 12:01, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
I think he may be loosed based on Yugi, but it probably wasn't intentional. Karm a fist 06:03, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
The robot is very much an homage to ideon. Look it up.
Consider it looked.
A-bomb is more a reference to Episode 3 when he says "Let's drop an attack bomb on 'em" than "Atomic Bomb."
There is no way to verify if a character or sence is based on anything, I think we should just eliminate them all, expect for the obvious like "Gerald Bald Z". -- FlareNUKE 08:52, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
I don't understand why people think "Woke Up Drunk" is episode 5 rather than episode 6 as it was aired. The ending of "Tusk" has Gerald riding his motorcycle into oblivion, and near the ending of "Woke Up Drunk", when Space Ghost and/or the narrator says "Computers" and goes back to the journey, you can SEE HIS CRASHED MOTORCYCLE IN THE BACKGROUND! Clearly, this episode should fall as episode 6, otherwise, how did the motorcycle (which is the same type as the one Gerald rode off into the explosion) get there?!
There was a 'bump' during the marathon saying that Woke Up Drunk was actually the 5th episode, and that Tusk was the 6th.
If you have time warner cable and go to the Adult swim section of cutting edge on demand it says"Perfect hair episode 6" the title of episode 6 is tusk..its been proven P.S. i dont know when theyre gonna replace that episode so hurry up and go there P.S.S. cutting edge on demand is chanel 1007(Time Warner cable, New York)
Tusk as the 6th, rather than 5th episode is supported by the order of the recently re-running of the episodes -- Woke up drunk was 5th, and Tusk was 6th. Michael.Urban 01:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
If Gerald is "on a quest to find the perfect hair," how can his wanderings be "aimless"? (See 2nd paragraph)
His wanderings aren't aimless so much as they are surreal and technically absurd. It's not the goal, it's the journey. I'd agree that aimless doesn't seem like the perfect word, but I'm not sure what the perfect word would be exactly. Perhaps I shall undertake a quest. --
24.20.129.61 06:41, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Is there a final count anywhere? Sweetfreek 05:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
I see six episodes on isohunt.com Family Guy Guy 07:59, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
There are 6 episodes in Season 1 (including the pilot) and 1 webisode for Season 2. -anon, 01:40, 06 May 2013
instead of the spaceghost thing in the begining wouldnt it make more sence for a piscture of those three to appear or at least somewhere in the article?
I added a notes section for the main benifit of stating the "Uncle Grandfather" observation I made. If I got any of the japanese wrong feel free to correct me. I was working from an english/japanese, japanese/english dictionary and an online translator. Nadiasama 08:19, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
In 12 Oz. Mouse, it appears that the seeds of an ongoing plot are growing with the Shark/Square With No Eyes cabal doing something insidious and Fitz/Skillet doing something for some reason, but otherwise, I can't think of any times Williams Street shows had any real chronological story sequencing to them other than mention of Banjo's death in SGC2C. Other than perhaps that instance(and even that is a stretch), you could watch just about any Williams Street produced show in any order without missing out on anything -- every episode was fully encapsulated in itself(and 12 Oz. Mouse is only a slight derivation on that trend). The "journey" backbone of PHF makes that impossible here. Karm a fist 06:03, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
This comment is outdated, for now there is Metalocalypse which contains much ongoing plot: for instance Toki's dad dies and in later episodes he becomes more depressed and crazy and also there is a very complex subplot going on now of some evil guys trying to take over the world I think... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.165.85 ( talk) 00:46, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Does anybody know who composed/performed the end theme to episode 2 (the king of animals)? You know, that haunting guitar song played when Gerald and his bunch head out towards Tuna Mountain. - Tronno ( t | c ) 21:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure, but I can tell you it's a remix of the song Time Scar from Chrono Trigger. 64.121.36.5 04:05, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone know why the "official" order seems to be different from the order the show is played in? I saw Tusk played before Woke Up Drunk in a marathon. Also, I seem to remember the ending of Woke Up Drunk showing Gerald walking away from a wrecked motorcycle which is probably the result of him launching toward Tuna Mountain in Tusk. Is this just Adult Swim screwing with the viewers? Should something of this be mentioned in the episode summaries? --DeathByNukes 08:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
This article is ridiculously long right now, especially for a show that only had seven episodes. It reads like a fan page right now, which is not what wikipedia is for. I am busy right now but I am going to do some major surgery on this article soon if nobody has any objections (probably even if they do). Man It's So Loud In Here ( talk) 23:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
It is not an accusation, it is a statement of fact. You are what you do, and what you are doing is indeed vandalism. Look, you're removing large amounts of content without discussion of the content itself (other than your opinion of "it's too long") and without any attempt to improve it. This is known as "blanking" (See WP:VAN).
You have also claimed it to be original research, but don't cite anything to back this claim. Many of the facts you are removing could indeed have citations added for them. The correct behavior in such a situation is to add cite tags to attempt to get people to add sources, not to remove the content entirely. Or better yet, integrate these facts into the main article itself. Rewrite the content. The goal should be to IMPROVE the article, not just to trim it down.
For every item you remove, you must DISCUSS IT here on this page and gather feedback. Wikipedia is not a "more reverts wins" operation. If the community agrees and supports the removal of the content, then fine, remove it. But suddenly removing almost 4k of text and two whole sections without any kind of discussion or debate is way outside the correct set of behaviors for Wikipedia.
And before doing anything else, please read WP:DR. The CONTENT should be the focus here, and you're simply ignoring it entirely. -- Otto 02:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Summary: User:Man It's So Loud In Here believes that the article is too long and badly worded. However, instead of fixing these problems, he insists on removing two whole sections of content in order to shorten the article. I've tried WP:DR, I've tried to follow WP:BRD, however I'm unable to get him to stop engaging in revert warring with me over this. I think that what he is doing is vandalism, as he is removing information that could potentially be sourced (as opposed to original research). What do others think about the topic? Is removing these sections the best way to shorten the article? Or should the other, longer, sections be rewritten instead? -- Otto 14:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
If after 30 days this article has not been cleaned up, I will personally nominate it for deletion on the grounds that this is self-referencing fancruft. I hope these comments help your discussions. Good editing! -- Gavin Collins ( talk) 15:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
I have removed the {{Plot}} and the {{context}} tags. First, there is very little plot discussion in this article at all, at most a few sentences. There's probably far too much about minor characters. bu that's not plot. Second, the introductory paragraph has just about all the context needed -- it's a animated series, on TV, from America, shown on Adult Swim and The Detour. Anything more than that doesn't belong in the intro, really. -- ArglebargleIV ( talk) 04:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
-- ArglebargleIV ( talk) 23:27, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Are you serious? It was notable enough to keep 2 years ago when it was proposed for deletion. The show existed, it has thousands of hits on Google, it's listed on IMDB and tv.com... what more do you want? -- Otto 14:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
The article is actually pretty good, especially the discussion of how its an inside joke. Its a good analysis of how it might be culturally relevant. BUT unless there are some third party sources about these things, its hard to establish these as facts. Can someone dig up some magazine articles or a reputable anime website that maybe interview the William Street employees about these "inside jokes"? See: WP:PSTS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehlkej ( talk • contribs) 02:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
In wikipedia's "Perfect hair forever" page, one of the voice actors is listed as Jon Benjamin. It is a common misconception that he voices Catman, however Carey Means (Frylock) voices Catman.
This needs to be changed.
The proof is on Perfect Hair Forever's IMDB.com page: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0465849/
{{ edit semi-protected}}
In the sidebar castlist, "created by" should be replaced with "written by" in accordance with the actual show credits. Carey Means should be removed from the Voices Of list. He does the voice of Frylock on Aqua Teen Hunger Force, but nothing in Perfect Hair Forever
Under Production, Scott Fry and Dave Willis should be removed. Scott Fry was the Animation and Effects Producer for Radical Axis, not a show producer. Dave Willis was the voice of Coiffio, not a show producer
Dave Hughes should be listed as Producer Matt Harrigan should be listed as Supervising Producer Keith Crofford should be added as an Executive Producer
Here is a link to the actual episodes on Adultswim.com, with credits intact at the end for reference. Thanks.
http://video.adultswim.com/perfect-hair-forever/
Johnnystumpsinger ( talk) 19:28, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Catman's character blurb refers to him being in a catsuit. What catsuit?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.177.110 ( talk) 03:30, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Perfect Hair Forever. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Any official word on whether this magazine was the inspiration for the name? I assume that it is.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.2.124.11 ( talk) 18:42, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
I don't really think Young Man (King of Animals) resembles Yugi Mutou, other than his necklace/amulet. Is there a closer analog to a different anime character?
Same goes for me, he doesn't... if they wanted that they would have made it more obvious... -- FlareNUKE 07:31, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Eh, if you ask me, he's a mismash of random Anime Characters. The Commander of animals thing could be a pokemon Refrence, and his suit kind of looks Like Spike's from Cowboy Bebop, albiet Spikes was blue, and didn't sparkle.
I don't think he's any anime character, just a stereotypicial anime guy...-- FlareNUKE 12:01, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
I think he may be loosed based on Yugi, but it probably wasn't intentional. Karm a fist 06:03, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
The robot is very much an homage to ideon. Look it up.
Consider it looked.
A-bomb is more a reference to Episode 3 when he says "Let's drop an attack bomb on 'em" than "Atomic Bomb."
There is no way to verify if a character or sence is based on anything, I think we should just eliminate them all, expect for the obvious like "Gerald Bald Z". -- FlareNUKE 08:52, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
I don't understand why people think "Woke Up Drunk" is episode 5 rather than episode 6 as it was aired. The ending of "Tusk" has Gerald riding his motorcycle into oblivion, and near the ending of "Woke Up Drunk", when Space Ghost and/or the narrator says "Computers" and goes back to the journey, you can SEE HIS CRASHED MOTORCYCLE IN THE BACKGROUND! Clearly, this episode should fall as episode 6, otherwise, how did the motorcycle (which is the same type as the one Gerald rode off into the explosion) get there?!
There was a 'bump' during the marathon saying that Woke Up Drunk was actually the 5th episode, and that Tusk was the 6th.
If you have time warner cable and go to the Adult swim section of cutting edge on demand it says"Perfect hair episode 6" the title of episode 6 is tusk..its been proven P.S. i dont know when theyre gonna replace that episode so hurry up and go there P.S.S. cutting edge on demand is chanel 1007(Time Warner cable, New York)
Tusk as the 6th, rather than 5th episode is supported by the order of the recently re-running of the episodes -- Woke up drunk was 5th, and Tusk was 6th. Michael.Urban 01:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
If Gerald is "on a quest to find the perfect hair," how can his wanderings be "aimless"? (See 2nd paragraph)
His wanderings aren't aimless so much as they are surreal and technically absurd. It's not the goal, it's the journey. I'd agree that aimless doesn't seem like the perfect word, but I'm not sure what the perfect word would be exactly. Perhaps I shall undertake a quest. --
24.20.129.61 06:41, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Is there a final count anywhere? Sweetfreek 05:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
I see six episodes on isohunt.com Family Guy Guy 07:59, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
There are 6 episodes in Season 1 (including the pilot) and 1 webisode for Season 2. -anon, 01:40, 06 May 2013
instead of the spaceghost thing in the begining wouldnt it make more sence for a piscture of those three to appear or at least somewhere in the article?
I added a notes section for the main benifit of stating the "Uncle Grandfather" observation I made. If I got any of the japanese wrong feel free to correct me. I was working from an english/japanese, japanese/english dictionary and an online translator. Nadiasama 08:19, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
In 12 Oz. Mouse, it appears that the seeds of an ongoing plot are growing with the Shark/Square With No Eyes cabal doing something insidious and Fitz/Skillet doing something for some reason, but otherwise, I can't think of any times Williams Street shows had any real chronological story sequencing to them other than mention of Banjo's death in SGC2C. Other than perhaps that instance(and even that is a stretch), you could watch just about any Williams Street produced show in any order without missing out on anything -- every episode was fully encapsulated in itself(and 12 Oz. Mouse is only a slight derivation on that trend). The "journey" backbone of PHF makes that impossible here. Karm a fist 06:03, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
This comment is outdated, for now there is Metalocalypse which contains much ongoing plot: for instance Toki's dad dies and in later episodes he becomes more depressed and crazy and also there is a very complex subplot going on now of some evil guys trying to take over the world I think... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.165.85 ( talk) 00:46, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Does anybody know who composed/performed the end theme to episode 2 (the king of animals)? You know, that haunting guitar song played when Gerald and his bunch head out towards Tuna Mountain. - Tronno ( t | c ) 21:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure, but I can tell you it's a remix of the song Time Scar from Chrono Trigger. 64.121.36.5 04:05, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone know why the "official" order seems to be different from the order the show is played in? I saw Tusk played before Woke Up Drunk in a marathon. Also, I seem to remember the ending of Woke Up Drunk showing Gerald walking away from a wrecked motorcycle which is probably the result of him launching toward Tuna Mountain in Tusk. Is this just Adult Swim screwing with the viewers? Should something of this be mentioned in the episode summaries? --DeathByNukes 08:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
This article is ridiculously long right now, especially for a show that only had seven episodes. It reads like a fan page right now, which is not what wikipedia is for. I am busy right now but I am going to do some major surgery on this article soon if nobody has any objections (probably even if they do). Man It's So Loud In Here ( talk) 23:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
It is not an accusation, it is a statement of fact. You are what you do, and what you are doing is indeed vandalism. Look, you're removing large amounts of content without discussion of the content itself (other than your opinion of "it's too long") and without any attempt to improve it. This is known as "blanking" (See WP:VAN).
You have also claimed it to be original research, but don't cite anything to back this claim. Many of the facts you are removing could indeed have citations added for them. The correct behavior in such a situation is to add cite tags to attempt to get people to add sources, not to remove the content entirely. Or better yet, integrate these facts into the main article itself. Rewrite the content. The goal should be to IMPROVE the article, not just to trim it down.
For every item you remove, you must DISCUSS IT here on this page and gather feedback. Wikipedia is not a "more reverts wins" operation. If the community agrees and supports the removal of the content, then fine, remove it. But suddenly removing almost 4k of text and two whole sections without any kind of discussion or debate is way outside the correct set of behaviors for Wikipedia.
And before doing anything else, please read WP:DR. The CONTENT should be the focus here, and you're simply ignoring it entirely. -- Otto 02:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Summary: User:Man It's So Loud In Here believes that the article is too long and badly worded. However, instead of fixing these problems, he insists on removing two whole sections of content in order to shorten the article. I've tried WP:DR, I've tried to follow WP:BRD, however I'm unable to get him to stop engaging in revert warring with me over this. I think that what he is doing is vandalism, as he is removing information that could potentially be sourced (as opposed to original research). What do others think about the topic? Is removing these sections the best way to shorten the article? Or should the other, longer, sections be rewritten instead? -- Otto 14:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
If after 30 days this article has not been cleaned up, I will personally nominate it for deletion on the grounds that this is self-referencing fancruft. I hope these comments help your discussions. Good editing! -- Gavin Collins ( talk) 15:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
I have removed the {{Plot}} and the {{context}} tags. First, there is very little plot discussion in this article at all, at most a few sentences. There's probably far too much about minor characters. bu that's not plot. Second, the introductory paragraph has just about all the context needed -- it's a animated series, on TV, from America, shown on Adult Swim and The Detour. Anything more than that doesn't belong in the intro, really. -- ArglebargleIV ( talk) 04:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
-- ArglebargleIV ( talk) 23:27, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Are you serious? It was notable enough to keep 2 years ago when it was proposed for deletion. The show existed, it has thousands of hits on Google, it's listed on IMDB and tv.com... what more do you want? -- Otto 14:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
The article is actually pretty good, especially the discussion of how its an inside joke. Its a good analysis of how it might be culturally relevant. BUT unless there are some third party sources about these things, its hard to establish these as facts. Can someone dig up some magazine articles or a reputable anime website that maybe interview the William Street employees about these "inside jokes"? See: WP:PSTS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehlkej ( talk • contribs) 02:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
In wikipedia's "Perfect hair forever" page, one of the voice actors is listed as Jon Benjamin. It is a common misconception that he voices Catman, however Carey Means (Frylock) voices Catman.
This needs to be changed.
The proof is on Perfect Hair Forever's IMDB.com page: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0465849/
{{ edit semi-protected}}
In the sidebar castlist, "created by" should be replaced with "written by" in accordance with the actual show credits. Carey Means should be removed from the Voices Of list. He does the voice of Frylock on Aqua Teen Hunger Force, but nothing in Perfect Hair Forever
Under Production, Scott Fry and Dave Willis should be removed. Scott Fry was the Animation and Effects Producer for Radical Axis, not a show producer. Dave Willis was the voice of Coiffio, not a show producer
Dave Hughes should be listed as Producer Matt Harrigan should be listed as Supervising Producer Keith Crofford should be added as an Executive Producer
Here is a link to the actual episodes on Adultswim.com, with credits intact at the end for reference. Thanks.
http://video.adultswim.com/perfect-hair-forever/
Johnnystumpsinger ( talk) 19:28, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Catman's character blurb refers to him being in a catsuit. What catsuit?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.177.110 ( talk) 03:30, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Perfect Hair Forever. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC)