 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
this page looks a bit iffy. Does anyone need to clean it up?
- Cleaned up and expanded to some extent.
- Should this be merged into the
Intel Pentium article, given that it is a continuation of that brand?
59.92.185.238 02:54, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Never mind, looks like all the different Pentium * processors have their own pages. 59.92.185.238 02:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure that "Pentium E2000" is an ideal name for this page, given that the processors are actually numbered E21x0. I think Pentium E would probably be more appropriate, given that it would fall into line with the Pentium D. -- DaveJB 21:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
this page looks a bit iffy. Does anyone need to clean it up?
- Cleaned up and expanded to some extent.
- Should this be merged into the
Intel Pentium article, given that it is a continuation of that brand?
59.92.185.238 02:54, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Never mind, looks like all the different Pentium * processors have their own pages. 59.92.185.238 02:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure that "Pentium E2000" is an ideal name for this page, given that the processors are actually numbered E21x0. I think Pentium E would probably be more appropriate, given that it would fall into line with the Pentium D. -- DaveJB 21:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)