![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 |
I removed that edit because it is not particularly accurate, and if it were, it does not seem very encyclopaedic in that position. If we are to have a paragraph for every animal with a different coloured penis... well! Anyway, it might be red, but to compare it with the grey fur or outer epidermis is nonsense. The red is more like mucous membrane such as in the uncircumcised human glans, rather than "skin". You might as well say a white man has a red skin because of the colour of his gums. And anyway, while you are at it, remember that the scrotum of the vervet is a vivid blue. Before I stand still for that edit, it needs to be suitably notable, relevant and accurate. After that I'll have no complaints. JonRichfield ( talk) 15:50, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
OK, I admit it: there are all sorts of WP goodies that I should know more about. But I could use a bit of help. In the wail at the top of the penis article there is a complaint about folks not using the Google Books Citation Generator. I tried it at the linked site and it worked pretty well I thought, but I can't see where I was supposed to have guessed it might be available. I can't even find it by searching. I must have cited a hundred or more google books in the last couple of years, and maybe even more www.archive.org books, often very laboriously. Is this new? Are there facilities for www.archive.org as well? Etc etc... JonRichfield ( talk) 13:12, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
I am placing this discussion here due to Jarble placing the merge templates on these articles. The recommendation is that Pizzle be merged into Penis. "Support" or "oppose"? Steel1943 ( talk) 04:20, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
The section about the cat penis links to an article about the anatomy of cats and only has one uniformative sentence about cat penises. Please remove the link. -- 87.156.41.166 ( talk) 14:06, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Penis's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "courtship":
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
There are too many references in some areas; one sentence has around 25 citations. Is this necessary? Melonkelon ( talk) 02:11, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Why is there no picture of human penis? An article about penises should have a picture of human penis. Maybe several, with one from each age group.
There should be. You might argue that there would be one on the dog penis article, but there wasnt, untill i re added it. This one would be fine here -
- and would make the article clearer, and easier to understand. 5.28.89.25 ( talk) 22:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
The section on "Human use of animal penises" contains a flag asking for comments on a suggestion to merge the separate article on pizzle with that section. I know very little about either subject beyond what is in these two articles, and I'm therefore not qualified to edit the substance of either. However, in my view, the separate article in pizzle seems to be of sufficient magnitude and with sufficient references that it deserves to keep its separate status. The present article on "penis" is already sufficiently long and with sufficient references, it seems inappropriate to merge the articles on that ground. Secondly, the subject of the pizzle article is sufficiently different, it deserves to be kept separate on that ground. DavidMCEddy ( talk) 20:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
This article is a mess; lots of dissimilar bits of text thrown together. I refactored the sections a bit, removing those with just one sentence, and condensed the hatnotes.
Right now the canine section is too long, as it just transcludes the standalone article; that should be condensed to a few sentences. Similar balancing and narrative are needed in each section. There are random anecdotes from individual animal orders, but no real overview or narrative to make sense of them. – SJ + 09:29, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is not about pickled penises, and jars with penises in do not look like penises. I will replace it with an image that conforms to guidelines. ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ (♥ Talk♥ ) 03:56, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Images must be relevant to the article that they appear in and be significantly and directly related to the article's topic. Because the Wikipedia project is in a position to offer multimedia learning to its audience, images are an important part of any article's presentation. Effort should therefore be made to improve quality and choice of images or captions in articles rather than favoring their removal, especially on pages which have few visuals. Images are primarily meant to inform readers by providing visual information. Consequently, images should look like what they are meant to illustrate, even if they are not provably authentic images.
I agree the current image is absolutely fine for illustrating the article. I'm always open to suggestions of a better one. -- cyclopia speak! 00:05, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
As ianmacm said in the last RFC, "This RFC is achieving very little. Please suggest a specific image for the infobox, and see if a consensus can be found to use it." I don't think anyone is taking the suggestion of using a broken statue of a penis seriously. -- NeilN talk to me 13:28, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
If are you looking for alternative images, you can browse through Category:Wikipedia restricted images which I just stumbled into today. Of course, it's human anatomy and you'll need Admin approval to post it to this article. But it does offer some alternatives to the current lede image that some Editors are unhappy with. Maybe those folks can post a link to a preferred image or two and people can weigh in. I'm not sure if there is a category like this for other species. Liz Read! Talk! 21:08, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
In the introduction, it is claimed that the only major function of a penis usually is sperm transfer. This is probably not true, as it can be argued that a vast majority of intromittent male genitalia also have a function in stimulation (Eberhard 1985). Penises can also have functions in antagonistic coevolution and sperm competition, but how widespread this is can be hard to estimate. The sexual selection pressures can often be very strong, as evident from the morphological diversity of male genitalia; and the traits that are involved can easily be argued to be major functions.
Since "stimulation" is such a loaded word it would be wise to keep it out of the introduction, but it is prevalent enough to prove erroneous the claim that the only major function is sperm transfer. I suggest that the paragraph is rewritten to the following:
The primary function of the penis is intromission and sperm transfer. In placental mammals, the penis also bears the distal part of the urethra, which discharges both urine during urination and semen during copulation as the occasion requires.
Eberhard, William (1985) Sexual selection and animal genitalia, Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 244 pp
141.51.253.74 ( talk) 16:03, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
The section where it talks about growth of penis during puberty cites a research that supposingly found out that penis stops growing after age of 17. The thing is that its not even what the research was about. I cant edit the page so if someone else can please do.
The article says: "An adult elephant has the largest penis of any land animal at 6 feet (1.8 m) on average.[2] An elephant's penis can reach a length of 100 cm (39 in) and a diameter of 16 cm (6 in) at the base." So is it 180cm on the average or 100cm at the extreme? Needs clarification.
The picture of the male human penis is circumcised and very small. I'm not sure this is representative of the average male anatomy, at least outside of the middle East/N. America?? Rather unencyclopedic, IMHO.
At least in mammals, and certainly in humans (and, even though Wikipedia is not supposed to show preferences, this is after all written for humans), the amount of time a penis is used for urination is far greater than that used for ejaculation of sperm. However, there are only two mentions of urination in this long article. More on this role is needed. At the same time, despite the concentration on sex, the one picture of a human penis is nonsexual. If we're talking about sex, then lets have a picture that is relevant.
In the section on bird penises, the article makes two contradictory claims:
"The Argentine Blue-bill has the largest penis in relation to body size of all vertebrates; while usually about half the body size (20 cm)"
"The Lake Duck is notable for possessing, in relation to body length, the longest penis of all vertebrates; the penis, which is typically coiled up in flaccid state, can reach about the same length as the animal himself when fully erect, but is more commonly about half the bird's length."
Clawdragons ( talk) 06:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I've archived a few threads, as old/undated/unsigned. — Cirt ( talk) 13:54, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
This article is nothing compared to the Vagina article. It's not at all bad. Why are the first pictures of elephants shouldn't a human's be the first? Just saying this so maybe someone will get it as good as Vagina. It doesn't really matter though. - DangerousJXD ( talk) 04:51, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
It may be interesting to add a section on the adaptations of the penis. For example, the coronal ridge has been linked to sperm competition. Specifically, the coronal ridge has been shown to remove sperm of other competitors. An evolutionary section on the adaptations of the penis would therefore expand this page. Rcuf235 ( talk) 14:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Penis. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
This article leaves me nonplussed with a photo of a human penis. I think Wikipedia should not explicitly show an actual human penis but more of a diagram or detailed drawing...— Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.7.27.34 ( talk • contribs) 13:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Penis has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to add 2 photos showing how Asian's penis looks like.
links are below: soft: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/08/Soft_Penis_of_an_Asian.jpg
hard: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/20/Hard_Penis_of_an_Asian_%28Hong_Kong%29.jpg Henrychan320 ( talk) 12:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
B E C K Y S A Y L E S
20:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request to
Penis has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
there is some false information and i'm a scientist i can change it Garrattw ( talk) 11:05, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 16:37, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Penis has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under Penis#Birds there is the sentence "Most birds mate with the males balancing on top of the females and touching cloacas in a "cloacal kiss"; this makes forceful insemination very difficult." The link in that sentence is to Sexual coercion which redirects to Rape, but a link to Sexual coercion among animals would be more appropriate. 122.61.72.237 ( talk) 09:01, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
I would like to propose a re-phrasing of the title of this section. I feel that this title does not convey what it actually refers to and is more easily confused with beastiality. I would propose the alternate title "Human utility of animal penises" or something along those lines. I feel that while 'utilise' is a synonym of 'use', it conveys a very different meaning, i.e. "using a penis" would have immediate sexual connotations while "utilising a penis" might refer to art or culinary applications. Waxworker ( talk) 20:22, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Penis (disambiguation). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Not a very active user ( talk) 05:51, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect PENIS. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:13, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Penis has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This is incorrect Mr 12395 ( talk) 01:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Draft:Pennis. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 19#Draft:Pennis until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Hog Farm
Talk
07:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Penis has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The paragraph titled 'Human Penis' gives an accurate description of an erection as the stiffening and rising of the penis. However there is no image to demonstrate an erection. May I suggest you include this image to illustrate an erection. File:Male genitals - erect penis and testicles.jpg Tricky-wiki-2021 ( talk) 14:53, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Chupa peak. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 20#Chupa peak until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
AngryHarpy
talk
10:51, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Kontol. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 6#Kontol until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:19, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
In Vertebrates § Birds, the second paragraph's first mention of the handedness of the duck's penis states clockwise. Later in said paragraph, it states the duck vagina is clockwise and the penis is counterclockwise. The latter is correct. While both claims had a source, it's a book and so I found this source instead, see fig 1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2871948/
73.240.141.48 ( talk) 04:36, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Penis has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The first opening parenthesis does not close.
change "A penis (plural penises or penes (/-niːz/) is" to "A penis (plural penises or penes (/-niːz/)) is" 2A02:1812:1611:7C00:EE7A:CA43:4FF6:7C82 ( talk) 17:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Image of human penis is concerning Faisv ( talk) 04:01, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Adakilo I'm sorry I'm just really scared and paranoid of things like that and now I'm more scared Faisv ( talk) 04:08, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
If you can, could you please delete this I don't feel comfortable with the ip being up there. I'm so so sorry Faisv ( talk) 04:16, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
I over stress about things, I'm sorry it's not concerning, I'm just too nervous again Faisv ( talk) 04:23, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Penis has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
say that a penis is what you pee out of 156.57.200.173 ( talk) 19:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I think that in this article there are images that are not entirely appropriate. for all audiences Bluetoothblue ( talk) 23:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 |
I removed that edit because it is not particularly accurate, and if it were, it does not seem very encyclopaedic in that position. If we are to have a paragraph for every animal with a different coloured penis... well! Anyway, it might be red, but to compare it with the grey fur or outer epidermis is nonsense. The red is more like mucous membrane such as in the uncircumcised human glans, rather than "skin". You might as well say a white man has a red skin because of the colour of his gums. And anyway, while you are at it, remember that the scrotum of the vervet is a vivid blue. Before I stand still for that edit, it needs to be suitably notable, relevant and accurate. After that I'll have no complaints. JonRichfield ( talk) 15:50, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
OK, I admit it: there are all sorts of WP goodies that I should know more about. But I could use a bit of help. In the wail at the top of the penis article there is a complaint about folks not using the Google Books Citation Generator. I tried it at the linked site and it worked pretty well I thought, but I can't see where I was supposed to have guessed it might be available. I can't even find it by searching. I must have cited a hundred or more google books in the last couple of years, and maybe even more www.archive.org books, often very laboriously. Is this new? Are there facilities for www.archive.org as well? Etc etc... JonRichfield ( talk) 13:12, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
I am placing this discussion here due to Jarble placing the merge templates on these articles. The recommendation is that Pizzle be merged into Penis. "Support" or "oppose"? Steel1943 ( talk) 04:20, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
The section about the cat penis links to an article about the anatomy of cats and only has one uniformative sentence about cat penises. Please remove the link. -- 87.156.41.166 ( talk) 14:06, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Penis's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "courtship":
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
There are too many references in some areas; one sentence has around 25 citations. Is this necessary? Melonkelon ( talk) 02:11, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Why is there no picture of human penis? An article about penises should have a picture of human penis. Maybe several, with one from each age group.
There should be. You might argue that there would be one on the dog penis article, but there wasnt, untill i re added it. This one would be fine here -
- and would make the article clearer, and easier to understand. 5.28.89.25 ( talk) 22:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
The section on "Human use of animal penises" contains a flag asking for comments on a suggestion to merge the separate article on pizzle with that section. I know very little about either subject beyond what is in these two articles, and I'm therefore not qualified to edit the substance of either. However, in my view, the separate article in pizzle seems to be of sufficient magnitude and with sufficient references that it deserves to keep its separate status. The present article on "penis" is already sufficiently long and with sufficient references, it seems inappropriate to merge the articles on that ground. Secondly, the subject of the pizzle article is sufficiently different, it deserves to be kept separate on that ground. DavidMCEddy ( talk) 20:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
This article is a mess; lots of dissimilar bits of text thrown together. I refactored the sections a bit, removing those with just one sentence, and condensed the hatnotes.
Right now the canine section is too long, as it just transcludes the standalone article; that should be condensed to a few sentences. Similar balancing and narrative are needed in each section. There are random anecdotes from individual animal orders, but no real overview or narrative to make sense of them. – SJ + 09:29, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is not about pickled penises, and jars with penises in do not look like penises. I will replace it with an image that conforms to guidelines. ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ (♥ Talk♥ ) 03:56, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Images must be relevant to the article that they appear in and be significantly and directly related to the article's topic. Because the Wikipedia project is in a position to offer multimedia learning to its audience, images are an important part of any article's presentation. Effort should therefore be made to improve quality and choice of images or captions in articles rather than favoring their removal, especially on pages which have few visuals. Images are primarily meant to inform readers by providing visual information. Consequently, images should look like what they are meant to illustrate, even if they are not provably authentic images.
I agree the current image is absolutely fine for illustrating the article. I'm always open to suggestions of a better one. -- cyclopia speak! 00:05, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
As ianmacm said in the last RFC, "This RFC is achieving very little. Please suggest a specific image for the infobox, and see if a consensus can be found to use it." I don't think anyone is taking the suggestion of using a broken statue of a penis seriously. -- NeilN talk to me 13:28, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
If are you looking for alternative images, you can browse through Category:Wikipedia restricted images which I just stumbled into today. Of course, it's human anatomy and you'll need Admin approval to post it to this article. But it does offer some alternatives to the current lede image that some Editors are unhappy with. Maybe those folks can post a link to a preferred image or two and people can weigh in. I'm not sure if there is a category like this for other species. Liz Read! Talk! 21:08, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
In the introduction, it is claimed that the only major function of a penis usually is sperm transfer. This is probably not true, as it can be argued that a vast majority of intromittent male genitalia also have a function in stimulation (Eberhard 1985). Penises can also have functions in antagonistic coevolution and sperm competition, but how widespread this is can be hard to estimate. The sexual selection pressures can often be very strong, as evident from the morphological diversity of male genitalia; and the traits that are involved can easily be argued to be major functions.
Since "stimulation" is such a loaded word it would be wise to keep it out of the introduction, but it is prevalent enough to prove erroneous the claim that the only major function is sperm transfer. I suggest that the paragraph is rewritten to the following:
The primary function of the penis is intromission and sperm transfer. In placental mammals, the penis also bears the distal part of the urethra, which discharges both urine during urination and semen during copulation as the occasion requires.
Eberhard, William (1985) Sexual selection and animal genitalia, Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 244 pp
141.51.253.74 ( talk) 16:03, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
The section where it talks about growth of penis during puberty cites a research that supposingly found out that penis stops growing after age of 17. The thing is that its not even what the research was about. I cant edit the page so if someone else can please do.
The article says: "An adult elephant has the largest penis of any land animal at 6 feet (1.8 m) on average.[2] An elephant's penis can reach a length of 100 cm (39 in) and a diameter of 16 cm (6 in) at the base." So is it 180cm on the average or 100cm at the extreme? Needs clarification.
The picture of the male human penis is circumcised and very small. I'm not sure this is representative of the average male anatomy, at least outside of the middle East/N. America?? Rather unencyclopedic, IMHO.
At least in mammals, and certainly in humans (and, even though Wikipedia is not supposed to show preferences, this is after all written for humans), the amount of time a penis is used for urination is far greater than that used for ejaculation of sperm. However, there are only two mentions of urination in this long article. More on this role is needed. At the same time, despite the concentration on sex, the one picture of a human penis is nonsexual. If we're talking about sex, then lets have a picture that is relevant.
In the section on bird penises, the article makes two contradictory claims:
"The Argentine Blue-bill has the largest penis in relation to body size of all vertebrates; while usually about half the body size (20 cm)"
"The Lake Duck is notable for possessing, in relation to body length, the longest penis of all vertebrates; the penis, which is typically coiled up in flaccid state, can reach about the same length as the animal himself when fully erect, but is more commonly about half the bird's length."
Clawdragons ( talk) 06:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I've archived a few threads, as old/undated/unsigned. — Cirt ( talk) 13:54, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
This article is nothing compared to the Vagina article. It's not at all bad. Why are the first pictures of elephants shouldn't a human's be the first? Just saying this so maybe someone will get it as good as Vagina. It doesn't really matter though. - DangerousJXD ( talk) 04:51, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
It may be interesting to add a section on the adaptations of the penis. For example, the coronal ridge has been linked to sperm competition. Specifically, the coronal ridge has been shown to remove sperm of other competitors. An evolutionary section on the adaptations of the penis would therefore expand this page. Rcuf235 ( talk) 14:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Penis. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
This article leaves me nonplussed with a photo of a human penis. I think Wikipedia should not explicitly show an actual human penis but more of a diagram or detailed drawing...— Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.7.27.34 ( talk • contribs) 13:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Penis has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to add 2 photos showing how Asian's penis looks like.
links are below: soft: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/08/Soft_Penis_of_an_Asian.jpg
hard: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/20/Hard_Penis_of_an_Asian_%28Hong_Kong%29.jpg Henrychan320 ( talk) 12:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
B E C K Y S A Y L E S
20:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request to
Penis has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
there is some false information and i'm a scientist i can change it Garrattw ( talk) 11:05, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 16:37, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Penis has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under Penis#Birds there is the sentence "Most birds mate with the males balancing on top of the females and touching cloacas in a "cloacal kiss"; this makes forceful insemination very difficult." The link in that sentence is to Sexual coercion which redirects to Rape, but a link to Sexual coercion among animals would be more appropriate. 122.61.72.237 ( talk) 09:01, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
I would like to propose a re-phrasing of the title of this section. I feel that this title does not convey what it actually refers to and is more easily confused with beastiality. I would propose the alternate title "Human utility of animal penises" or something along those lines. I feel that while 'utilise' is a synonym of 'use', it conveys a very different meaning, i.e. "using a penis" would have immediate sexual connotations while "utilising a penis" might refer to art or culinary applications. Waxworker ( talk) 20:22, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Penis (disambiguation). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Not a very active user ( talk) 05:51, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect PENIS. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:13, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Penis has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This is incorrect Mr 12395 ( talk) 01:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Draft:Pennis. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 19#Draft:Pennis until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Hog Farm
Talk
07:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Penis has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The paragraph titled 'Human Penis' gives an accurate description of an erection as the stiffening and rising of the penis. However there is no image to demonstrate an erection. May I suggest you include this image to illustrate an erection. File:Male genitals - erect penis and testicles.jpg Tricky-wiki-2021 ( talk) 14:53, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Chupa peak. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 20#Chupa peak until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
AngryHarpy
talk
10:51, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Kontol. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 6#Kontol until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:19, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
In Vertebrates § Birds, the second paragraph's first mention of the handedness of the duck's penis states clockwise. Later in said paragraph, it states the duck vagina is clockwise and the penis is counterclockwise. The latter is correct. While both claims had a source, it's a book and so I found this source instead, see fig 1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2871948/
73.240.141.48 ( talk) 04:36, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Penis has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The first opening parenthesis does not close.
change "A penis (plural penises or penes (/-niːz/) is" to "A penis (plural penises or penes (/-niːz/)) is" 2A02:1812:1611:7C00:EE7A:CA43:4FF6:7C82 ( talk) 17:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Image of human penis is concerning Faisv ( talk) 04:01, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Adakilo I'm sorry I'm just really scared and paranoid of things like that and now I'm more scared Faisv ( talk) 04:08, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
If you can, could you please delete this I don't feel comfortable with the ip being up there. I'm so so sorry Faisv ( talk) 04:16, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
I over stress about things, I'm sorry it's not concerning, I'm just too nervous again Faisv ( talk) 04:23, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Penis has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
say that a penis is what you pee out of 156.57.200.173 ( talk) 19:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I think that in this article there are images that are not entirely appropriate. for all audiences Bluetoothblue ( talk) 23:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC)