This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Pelli Chesi Choodu article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Well, the source says "NTR had asked Ghantasala to teach him to play the harmonium and some singing lessons. NTR used these newly acquired abilities in a song in the movie, looking convincing as he plays the harmonium like a pro", and in the film, he does that for more than one song.
Pavanjandhyala (
talk) 15:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
". S. V. Ranga Rao played the role of a zamindar in the film; Ranga Rao exhibited a strange body language that he observed in a stranger at a railway station" - try "In playing the role of the zamindar, Ranga Rao exhibited a strange body language, inspired by a stranger he had observed at a railway station".
"Pelli Chesi Choodu was released on 19 February 1952, while Kalyanam Panni Paar was released 100 days later. Both versions were released" -rep of "released"
" success made Prasad famous in both Telugu and Tamil cinema.[10] After Pelli Chesi Choodu, Prasad and Vijaya Vauhini Studios collaborated on Missamma (1955) and Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu (1959). All three films were commercially successful and achieved cult status in Telugu cinema.[11][12] Pelli Chesi Choodu is considered as one of the most successful" -rep of success/ful
I have tried to rephrase it. Please take a look at this once : "Guy said the film's box office performance made Prasad famous in both Telugu and Tamil cinema.[10] After Pelli Chesi Choodu, Prasad and Vijaya Vauhini Studios collaborated on Missamma (1955) and Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu (1959). All three films were profitable ventures and achieved cult status in Telugu cinema.[11][12] Pelli Chesi Choodu is considered as one of the acclaimed films in the careers of..."
Pavanjandhyala (
talk) 15:26, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Fine.
"commercially successful.[4] Prasad remade the film in Hindi as Shaadi Ke Baad (1972), in which Jeetendra, Rakhee and Shatrughan Sinha reprised the roles played by Rama Rao, Varalakshmi and Ranga Rao in the original. Shaadi Ke Baad was a commercial failure.[1][4] In late November 2007, a Hyderabad-based company named Goldstone Technologies acquired the film negative rights to 14 Telugu films produced by Vijaya Vauhini Studios, including Mayabazar (1957) and Pelli Chesi Choodu, to release digitally re-mastered versions in colour.[16] The remastered and colourised version of Mayabazar released in January 2010 and was commercially successful" -find a way to avoid repeating "commercially successful" or commercially anything.
I've tried to rephrase this as well. Please take a look at this once : "Maduve Madi Nodu was a profitable venture.[4] Prasad remade the film in Hindi as Shaadi Ke Baad (1972), in which Jeetendra, Rakhee and Shatrughan Sinha reprised the roles played by Rama Rao, Varalakshmi and Ranga Rao in the original. Shaadi Ke Baad underperformed at the box office.[1][4] The remastered and colourised version of Mayabazar was released in January 2010 and performed well in theatres, but Goldstone...".
Pavanjandhyala (
talk) 15:31, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Fine.
Took care of more minor issues myself. Not great, it's a bit generic/plodding in places, I think largely due to the obvious lack of solid info available on the film. Considering that though you've done well.♦
Dr. Blofeld 13:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Thanks for all the edits and comments,
Dr. Blofeld. I've tried to resolve all the comments you have listed above. Please take a look at the article once again and suggest changes if any.
Pavanjandhyala (
talk) 15:35, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
OK. Considering the lack of coverage on the film I think it's adequate, though the prose in places I think could still be improved. Good job.♦
Dr. Blofeld 15:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Thank you
Doctor, for taking out some time from your busy schedule to review this article.
Pavanjandhyala (
talk) 15:50, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Requested move 15 January 2022
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose per 162 etc. The 1952 film qualifies as a PTOPIC per pageviews. A cursory look at
google results also tells that most sources refer to the '52 film. --
Ab207 (
talk) 14:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose: I'm not even sure the 1988 film should have an article as it lacks RS, and is one of myriad articles mindlessly created by Bhargava Teja. Kailash29792(talk) 15:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Pelli Chesi Choodu article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Well, the source says "NTR had asked Ghantasala to teach him to play the harmonium and some singing lessons. NTR used these newly acquired abilities in a song in the movie, looking convincing as he plays the harmonium like a pro", and in the film, he does that for more than one song.
Pavanjandhyala (
talk) 15:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
". S. V. Ranga Rao played the role of a zamindar in the film; Ranga Rao exhibited a strange body language that he observed in a stranger at a railway station" - try "In playing the role of the zamindar, Ranga Rao exhibited a strange body language, inspired by a stranger he had observed at a railway station".
"Pelli Chesi Choodu was released on 19 February 1952, while Kalyanam Panni Paar was released 100 days later. Both versions were released" -rep of "released"
" success made Prasad famous in both Telugu and Tamil cinema.[10] After Pelli Chesi Choodu, Prasad and Vijaya Vauhini Studios collaborated on Missamma (1955) and Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu (1959). All three films were commercially successful and achieved cult status in Telugu cinema.[11][12] Pelli Chesi Choodu is considered as one of the most successful" -rep of success/ful
I have tried to rephrase it. Please take a look at this once : "Guy said the film's box office performance made Prasad famous in both Telugu and Tamil cinema.[10] After Pelli Chesi Choodu, Prasad and Vijaya Vauhini Studios collaborated on Missamma (1955) and Appu Chesi Pappu Koodu (1959). All three films were profitable ventures and achieved cult status in Telugu cinema.[11][12] Pelli Chesi Choodu is considered as one of the acclaimed films in the careers of..."
Pavanjandhyala (
talk) 15:26, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Fine.
"commercially successful.[4] Prasad remade the film in Hindi as Shaadi Ke Baad (1972), in which Jeetendra, Rakhee and Shatrughan Sinha reprised the roles played by Rama Rao, Varalakshmi and Ranga Rao in the original. Shaadi Ke Baad was a commercial failure.[1][4] In late November 2007, a Hyderabad-based company named Goldstone Technologies acquired the film negative rights to 14 Telugu films produced by Vijaya Vauhini Studios, including Mayabazar (1957) and Pelli Chesi Choodu, to release digitally re-mastered versions in colour.[16] The remastered and colourised version of Mayabazar released in January 2010 and was commercially successful" -find a way to avoid repeating "commercially successful" or commercially anything.
I've tried to rephrase this as well. Please take a look at this once : "Maduve Madi Nodu was a profitable venture.[4] Prasad remade the film in Hindi as Shaadi Ke Baad (1972), in which Jeetendra, Rakhee and Shatrughan Sinha reprised the roles played by Rama Rao, Varalakshmi and Ranga Rao in the original. Shaadi Ke Baad underperformed at the box office.[1][4] The remastered and colourised version of Mayabazar was released in January 2010 and performed well in theatres, but Goldstone...".
Pavanjandhyala (
talk) 15:31, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Fine.
Took care of more minor issues myself. Not great, it's a bit generic/plodding in places, I think largely due to the obvious lack of solid info available on the film. Considering that though you've done well.♦
Dr. Blofeld 13:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Thanks for all the edits and comments,
Dr. Blofeld. I've tried to resolve all the comments you have listed above. Please take a look at the article once again and suggest changes if any.
Pavanjandhyala (
talk) 15:35, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
OK. Considering the lack of coverage on the film I think it's adequate, though the prose in places I think could still be improved. Good job.♦
Dr. Blofeld 15:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Thank you
Doctor, for taking out some time from your busy schedule to review this article.
Pavanjandhyala (
talk) 15:50, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Requested move 15 January 2022
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose per 162 etc. The 1952 film qualifies as a PTOPIC per pageviews. A cursory look at
google results also tells that most sources refer to the '52 film. --
Ab207 (
talk) 14:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose: I'm not even sure the 1988 film should have an article as it lacks RS, and is one of myriad articles mindlessly created by Bhargava Teja. Kailash29792(talk) 15:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.