![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
"Peace war game" is to "Chicken game" as "Apples" is to "Oranges". The point has been discussed ad nauseum elsewhere by several editors, but (IMHO) not addressed by the author of this article. I'm redirecting to Prisoner's dilemma per discussion on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Game_theory etc. Pete.Hurd 14:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello Pete, I thought I addressed it ad nauseum, as you say, on the Chicken game discussion page, but I'll address it here, too. A unilateral REDIRECT to Prisoner's dilemma, deletes historical linkages, analyses, references, and edits by others, but most importantly ignores the sense of discussions on the subject, particularly w.r.t. combining it with other game theory pages. The Peace War Game has direct implications for peace, war, foreign policy, economics, personal morality, etc. without wading through a lot of game theory. Please, leave it. -- Mbhiii 15:05, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
For rationale for redirection, see discussion on Talk:Chicken (game)#Peace war game, Talk:Chicken (game)#Hawk Dove/Chicken and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Game theory#Collaboration. Pete.Hurd 22:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Note, rewritten to address above concerns. - 63.98.135.196 ( talk) 19:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't this be redirected to Prisoner's Dilemma, they're pretty much the same thing. 24.1.201.172 ( talk) 00:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Do we really need a book quote at the end of the article? Yxukkai ( talk) 05:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
"Peace war game" is to "Chicken game" as "Apples" is to "Oranges". The point has been discussed ad nauseum elsewhere by several editors, but (IMHO) not addressed by the author of this article. I'm redirecting to Prisoner's dilemma per discussion on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Game_theory etc. Pete.Hurd 14:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello Pete, I thought I addressed it ad nauseum, as you say, on the Chicken game discussion page, but I'll address it here, too. A unilateral REDIRECT to Prisoner's dilemma, deletes historical linkages, analyses, references, and edits by others, but most importantly ignores the sense of discussions on the subject, particularly w.r.t. combining it with other game theory pages. The Peace War Game has direct implications for peace, war, foreign policy, economics, personal morality, etc. without wading through a lot of game theory. Please, leave it. -- Mbhiii 15:05, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
For rationale for redirection, see discussion on Talk:Chicken (game)#Peace war game, Talk:Chicken (game)#Hawk Dove/Chicken and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Game theory#Collaboration. Pete.Hurd 22:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Note, rewritten to address above concerns. - 63.98.135.196 ( talk) 19:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't this be redirected to Prisoner's Dilemma, they're pretty much the same thing. 24.1.201.172 ( talk) 00:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Do we really need a book quote at the end of the article? Yxukkai ( talk) 05:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)