This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
In the online magazine
Jewcy, one can find the
following text written by Paul Gottfried. It includes the statement:
This leaves no doubt, that the categories
are in fact justified.
Sincerely,
84.136.228.123 (
talk)
18:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
For what it's worth, he also mentions that he is Jewish in an interview done by the blog, The Idiots [1]:
"Perhaps at the end of the day I’m too much of an Old Testament Jew to accept this act of divine self-debasement [Christ's crucifixtion] as a ransom for our sins." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.228.66 ( talk) 20:25, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
In John Derbyshire's review of Paul Gottfried's autobiography, he talks about the schism between paleoconservatives and neoconservatives and notes that Gottfried is a Jewish paleoconservative [2]:
"As a Jewish paleocon, Gottfried is neither fish nor fowl to adherents of these simple-minded formulas. He records being “startled” to hear (from Peter Stanlis) that “Gertrude Himmelfarb, whose dislike for me I never doubted, had assumed I was a ‘German Catholic’ who was only pretending to have come from a Jewish refugee family.”"
Does National Review meet Wikipedia's requirements for reliable sources? 69.115.228.66 ( talk) 14:42, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
"He is the author of numerous books and articles in several languages on intellectual history..."
Does this mean they've been translated into several languages or that he writes in several languages?
Thanks
-- TyrS chatties 08:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
I have removed the completely unsourced commentary on his political positions per WP:BLP as this is almost certain to prove contentious. It requires careful verification from independent, reliable sources. Cusop Dingle ( talk) 11:56, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
You obviously have not read any of his books. Having just read 6 of his books, I can tell you that attacking "Neo-Conservatism" (from a "Paleo-Conservative" perspective) is one of his key themes. ERIDU-DREAMING ( talk) 18:14, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Paul Gottfried. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
In the online magazine
Jewcy, one can find the
following text written by Paul Gottfried. It includes the statement:
This leaves no doubt, that the categories
are in fact justified.
Sincerely,
84.136.228.123 (
talk)
18:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
For what it's worth, he also mentions that he is Jewish in an interview done by the blog, The Idiots [1]:
"Perhaps at the end of the day I’m too much of an Old Testament Jew to accept this act of divine self-debasement [Christ's crucifixtion] as a ransom for our sins." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.228.66 ( talk) 20:25, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
In John Derbyshire's review of Paul Gottfried's autobiography, he talks about the schism between paleoconservatives and neoconservatives and notes that Gottfried is a Jewish paleoconservative [2]:
"As a Jewish paleocon, Gottfried is neither fish nor fowl to adherents of these simple-minded formulas. He records being “startled” to hear (from Peter Stanlis) that “Gertrude Himmelfarb, whose dislike for me I never doubted, had assumed I was a ‘German Catholic’ who was only pretending to have come from a Jewish refugee family.”"
Does National Review meet Wikipedia's requirements for reliable sources? 69.115.228.66 ( talk) 14:42, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
"He is the author of numerous books and articles in several languages on intellectual history..."
Does this mean they've been translated into several languages or that he writes in several languages?
Thanks
-- TyrS chatties 08:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
I have removed the completely unsourced commentary on his political positions per WP:BLP as this is almost certain to prove contentious. It requires careful verification from independent, reliable sources. Cusop Dingle ( talk) 11:56, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
You obviously have not read any of his books. Having just read 6 of his books, I can tell you that attacking "Neo-Conservatism" (from a "Paleo-Conservative" perspective) is one of his key themes. ERIDU-DREAMING ( talk) 18:14, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Paul Gottfried. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)