![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
[moved from User talk:Marc Lacoste, more relevant here]
DO NOT engaged in an edit warring as done on Partenavia P.68 article. You are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing others. FYI as it stands you have reverted BilCat and myself, and even went as far to compromise - So you need to take your view to the talk page - FOX 52 talk! 05:28, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
@ FOX 52: leave this part here where it's relevant!-- Marc Lacoste ( talk) 07:57, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Requesting for input @ BilCat: @ Ahunt: @ Fnlayson: @ MilborneOne: - I've purposed the following image clean up per WP:IMAGEMOS (it included a main image change) - the prior version was this - Editor Marc Lacoste ( talk) reverted, followed by BilCat's reversion back. (Lacoste reverted again) so I applied a compromise, not good enough for editor Lacoste, I offered a second compromise restoring his preferred main image, again still not good enough for editor Lacoste. (not even an edit note, on the last revert) - I sent him a warning ( edit warring) - So? - FOX 52 talk! 07:51, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Anybody know why we describe variants in "Development" and have a wierd non-standard table in "Variants" ? MilborneOne ( talk) 08:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
[moved from User talk:Marc Lacoste, more relevant here]
DO NOT engaged in an edit warring as done on Partenavia P.68 article. You are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing others. FYI as it stands you have reverted BilCat and myself, and even went as far to compromise - So you need to take your view to the talk page - FOX 52 talk! 05:28, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
@ FOX 52: leave this part here where it's relevant!-- Marc Lacoste ( talk) 07:57, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Requesting for input @ BilCat: @ Ahunt: @ Fnlayson: @ MilborneOne: - I've purposed the following image clean up per WP:IMAGEMOS (it included a main image change) - the prior version was this - Editor Marc Lacoste ( talk) reverted, followed by BilCat's reversion back. (Lacoste reverted again) so I applied a compromise, not good enough for editor Lacoste, I offered a second compromise restoring his preferred main image, again still not good enough for editor Lacoste. (not even an edit note, on the last revert) - I sent him a warning ( edit warring) - So? - FOX 52 talk! 07:51, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Anybody know why we describe variants in "Development" and have a wierd non-standard table in "Variants" ? MilborneOne ( talk) 08:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)