Park Row Building has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 27, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Park Row Building appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 30 August 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
User:Emerson7 is undoing some layout choices I made without discussing them here, despite my request that he do so. He was Bold, I Reverted, now it's time to Discuss, not for him to continue to reinsert his changes.
We should always strive to make our articles are good as they can be, and deleting stuff that improves an article, simply because "the MoS says so..." is not a helpful choice -- doing so without discussion is not the way things are done here. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 02:56, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
In the yellow template it reads that the Park Row building was the tallest building of the world until 1901 - that is not correct. The article History of the tallest buildings in the world clearly states that "From 1300 until 1901, the world's tallest building was always a church or cathedral" so actually the tallest building preceding Philadelphia City Hall is the Ulm Minster in Germany. The whole series of preceding "Tallest Buildings of the world" seems to ignore churches and such as buildings??? -- Estormiz ( talk) 17:29, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The symmetrical front facade is layered as it rises. The two 3-story towers are capped with copper-clad domes. There are four caryatids and 16 figures. Really? So where are they? And the flagpoles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.175.191.46 ( talk) 14:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
The article should reflect that the flagpoles and those figures are long gone! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.175.191.46 ( talk) 09:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Oh God, another one. What makes me think? How about my eyes and that thing called brain? Where are the flagpoles and the figures?: http://buildingdb.ctbuh.org/images/albums/userpics/10002/ParkRow_Overall_MGa.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/49/15_Park_Row.JPG http://buildingdb.ctbuh.org/images/albums/userpics/10002/ParkRow_Overall_MGa.jpg Please show me exactly where you see those flagpoles and 16 figures there in these recent photos? Should be easy for you, wikigenious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.175.191.46 ( talk) 16:37, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
look again. Still the same? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.175.191.46 ( talk) 21:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://s-media.nyc.gov/agencies/lpc/lp/2024.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. epicgenius ( talk) 14:10, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
The Squirrel Conspiracy (
talk) 00:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
5x expanded by Epicgenius ( talk). Self-nominated at 17:21, 31 July 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Good to go. I found ALT2 more interesting and others are fine too. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk 11:17, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Eddie891 ( talk · contribs) 02:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
One... Eddie891 Talk Work 02:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Park Row Building has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 27, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Park Row Building appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 30 August 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
User:Emerson7 is undoing some layout choices I made without discussing them here, despite my request that he do so. He was Bold, I Reverted, now it's time to Discuss, not for him to continue to reinsert his changes.
We should always strive to make our articles are good as they can be, and deleting stuff that improves an article, simply because "the MoS says so..." is not a helpful choice -- doing so without discussion is not the way things are done here. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 02:56, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
In the yellow template it reads that the Park Row building was the tallest building of the world until 1901 - that is not correct. The article History of the tallest buildings in the world clearly states that "From 1300 until 1901, the world's tallest building was always a church or cathedral" so actually the tallest building preceding Philadelphia City Hall is the Ulm Minster in Germany. The whole series of preceding "Tallest Buildings of the world" seems to ignore churches and such as buildings??? -- Estormiz ( talk) 17:29, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The symmetrical front facade is layered as it rises. The two 3-story towers are capped with copper-clad domes. There are four caryatids and 16 figures. Really? So where are they? And the flagpoles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.175.191.46 ( talk) 14:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
The article should reflect that the flagpoles and those figures are long gone! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.175.191.46 ( talk) 09:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Oh God, another one. What makes me think? How about my eyes and that thing called brain? Where are the flagpoles and the figures?: http://buildingdb.ctbuh.org/images/albums/userpics/10002/ParkRow_Overall_MGa.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/49/15_Park_Row.JPG http://buildingdb.ctbuh.org/images/albums/userpics/10002/ParkRow_Overall_MGa.jpg Please show me exactly where you see those flagpoles and 16 figures there in these recent photos? Should be easy for you, wikigenious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.175.191.46 ( talk) 16:37, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
look again. Still the same? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.175.191.46 ( talk) 21:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://s-media.nyc.gov/agencies/lpc/lp/2024.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. epicgenius ( talk) 14:10, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
The Squirrel Conspiracy (
talk) 00:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
5x expanded by Epicgenius ( talk). Self-nominated at 17:21, 31 July 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Good to go. I found ALT2 more interesting and others are fine too. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk 11:17, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Eddie891 ( talk · contribs) 02:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
One... Eddie891 Talk Work 02:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)