This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The 'origin' section seems rather odd. Chensiyuan 05:38, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Joaquim Vanda misses a photograph! Please help. -- DLL 22:14, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Since this article contains information presented by sources which hold diametrically opposed views, identifying each source should help make the contents less odd and less confusing.--J. A.
Your stuff is great info for my brocure on Singapore keep it up what is your name? I need it for my bibliography could you write it on your article for me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.2.186 ( talk) 05:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
This article presented only one version of the story, the version concocted by an amateur historian who is an Armenian nationalist is favored only by a few hobby growers. No orchid scientist accepts this version. I added the version favored by orchid scientists a few days ago, but it was removed immediately. I added it again on 29 December 2009, 11:30 pm California time. It was removed again. A person who does not sign his/her name keeps changing the article to present only one side of the story. Those interested in the version favored by scientists should refer to the chapter by J. Arditti and C. S. Hew in orchid Biology Reviews and Perspectives, Volume IX which was edited by T. Kull, S.M. Wong and myself and published by the New York Botanical Garden Press-- Professor Joseph Arditti —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.96.93.155 ( talk) 07:29, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
I just recovered my log in information. The edit of the article which added another view to make it well rounded and fair is by me. So is the preceding paragraph. It is sad and unethical to have to contend with removal of information which is intended to make an article well balanced. If nothing else, removing information which balances an articles is an indication extremist Armenian nationalism. --Professor Joseph Arditti —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarditti ( talk • contribs) 07:55, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
My use of Jarditti has raised questions. This may be because I may be registered as jarditti. Is registration case sensitive? Sorry. Jarditti ( talk) 08:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Professor Joseph Arditti
History I find it interesting that those who credit Miss Agnes Joaquim with breeding rather than finding the orchid are not willing to allow an opinion other than theirs to be included in this entry. The proper and ethical approach would be to present both views. Also, I sign my revisions. The other side only uses a log in name. Joseph Arditti, Professor of Biology Emeritus, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarditti ( talk • contribs) 06:48, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Vanda 'Miss Joaquim'. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
The current name as used for the article title and as mentioned in the text has several issues:
Here are two references for confirmation:
The first of those references is to the Royal Horticultural Society, which is the registrar for orchid names.
There is also the book Biology of Vanda Miss Joaquim by De Choy Sin Hew, Tim Wing Yam, and Joseph Arditti. I can't copy-paste the text of book here because I only have access to it via Google Books, but it confirms on Page 2 that « Papilionanthe Miss Joaquim » is the correct name, and that it has a cultivar named 'Agnes', giving the full name « Papilionanthe Miss Joaquim 'Agnes' ». The book also states that is is the grex Papilionanthe Miss Joaquim that is the national flower of Singapore, rather than the particular cultivar.
Note: As an orchid which is often mentioned in non-horticultural circles, this orchid is subject to having its name mangled a lot.
If there are no objections, I will make the corresponding changes.– Jérôme ( talk) 11:07, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved to Papilionanthe Miss Joaquim by User:Jérôme. ( non-admin closure) Iffy★ Chat -- 12:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Vanda 'Miss Joaquim' →
Vanda Miss Joaquim – The correct name of this orchid does not include the quotes. See
Talk:Vanda_'Miss_Joaquim'#Correct_naming. The new name is at the moment a redirect to this page.
Jérôme (
talk) 10:31, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
April 14: I've performed the move (which I was now able because the target name with "Papilionanthe" was not yet a redirect), and changed the article to reflect the genus name "Papilionanthe".– Jérôme ( talk) 15:22, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
I moved the following from the article page: (Please include only verifiable statements, rather than opinions or conjectures. Ps, Is there a reference for this?)– Jérôme ( talk) 13:12, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The 'origin' section seems rather odd. Chensiyuan 05:38, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Joaquim Vanda misses a photograph! Please help. -- DLL 22:14, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Since this article contains information presented by sources which hold diametrically opposed views, identifying each source should help make the contents less odd and less confusing.--J. A.
Your stuff is great info for my brocure on Singapore keep it up what is your name? I need it for my bibliography could you write it on your article for me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.2.186 ( talk) 05:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
This article presented only one version of the story, the version concocted by an amateur historian who is an Armenian nationalist is favored only by a few hobby growers. No orchid scientist accepts this version. I added the version favored by orchid scientists a few days ago, but it was removed immediately. I added it again on 29 December 2009, 11:30 pm California time. It was removed again. A person who does not sign his/her name keeps changing the article to present only one side of the story. Those interested in the version favored by scientists should refer to the chapter by J. Arditti and C. S. Hew in orchid Biology Reviews and Perspectives, Volume IX which was edited by T. Kull, S.M. Wong and myself and published by the New York Botanical Garden Press-- Professor Joseph Arditti —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.96.93.155 ( talk) 07:29, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
I just recovered my log in information. The edit of the article which added another view to make it well rounded and fair is by me. So is the preceding paragraph. It is sad and unethical to have to contend with removal of information which is intended to make an article well balanced. If nothing else, removing information which balances an articles is an indication extremist Armenian nationalism. --Professor Joseph Arditti —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarditti ( talk • contribs) 07:55, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
My use of Jarditti has raised questions. This may be because I may be registered as jarditti. Is registration case sensitive? Sorry. Jarditti ( talk) 08:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Professor Joseph Arditti
History I find it interesting that those who credit Miss Agnes Joaquim with breeding rather than finding the orchid are not willing to allow an opinion other than theirs to be included in this entry. The proper and ethical approach would be to present both views. Also, I sign my revisions. The other side only uses a log in name. Joseph Arditti, Professor of Biology Emeritus, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarditti ( talk • contribs) 06:48, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Vanda 'Miss Joaquim'. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
The current name as used for the article title and as mentioned in the text has several issues:
Here are two references for confirmation:
The first of those references is to the Royal Horticultural Society, which is the registrar for orchid names.
There is also the book Biology of Vanda Miss Joaquim by De Choy Sin Hew, Tim Wing Yam, and Joseph Arditti. I can't copy-paste the text of book here because I only have access to it via Google Books, but it confirms on Page 2 that « Papilionanthe Miss Joaquim » is the correct name, and that it has a cultivar named 'Agnes', giving the full name « Papilionanthe Miss Joaquim 'Agnes' ». The book also states that is is the grex Papilionanthe Miss Joaquim that is the national flower of Singapore, rather than the particular cultivar.
Note: As an orchid which is often mentioned in non-horticultural circles, this orchid is subject to having its name mangled a lot.
If there are no objections, I will make the corresponding changes.– Jérôme ( talk) 11:07, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved to Papilionanthe Miss Joaquim by User:Jérôme. ( non-admin closure) Iffy★ Chat -- 12:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Vanda 'Miss Joaquim' →
Vanda Miss Joaquim – The correct name of this orchid does not include the quotes. See
Talk:Vanda_'Miss_Joaquim'#Correct_naming. The new name is at the moment a redirect to this page.
Jérôme (
talk) 10:31, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
April 14: I've performed the move (which I was now able because the target name with "Papilionanthe" was not yet a redirect), and changed the article to reflect the genus name "Papilionanthe".– Jérôme ( talk) 15:22, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
I moved the following from the article page: (Please include only verifiable statements, rather than opinions or conjectures. Ps, Is there a reference for this?)– Jérôme ( talk) 13:12, 15 October 2019 (UTC)