Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
This article has undergone a reassessment as part of the GA sweeps performed by the Good Article Project Quality taskforce in order to ensure that it still meets the requirements for Good Article status.
Overall, this article is quite good. There are just a few small things that I would like to see:
I will place this reassessment on hold to allow for these concerns to be addressed or discussed. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 04:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Looks like it's all done. I'll close this as a keep. Thanks for your help. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 16:32, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
This article has undergone a reassessment as part of the GA sweeps performed by the Good Article Project Quality taskforce in order to ensure that it still meets the requirements for Good Article status.
Overall, this article is quite good. There are just a few small things that I would like to see:
I will place this reassessment on hold to allow for these concerns to be addressed or discussed. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 04:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Looks like it's all done. I'll close this as a keep. Thanks for your help. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 16:32, 30 August 2009 (UTC)