This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1492 papal conclave article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1492 papal conclave has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Excellent article. Very informative.
I'd just be careful with the Allegations of Simony section - it's NPOV leaning towards not exactly neutral - that's all. Cheers, Corvus coronoides 23:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
This article has undergone a reassessment as part of the GA sweeps performed by the Good Article Project Quality taskforce in order to ensure that it still meets the requirements for Good Article status.
Overall, this article is quite good. There are just a few small things that I would like to see:
I will place this reassessment on hold to allow for these concerns to be addressed or discussed. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 04:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Looks like it's all done. I'll close this as a keep. Thanks for your help. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 16:32, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
One annoying thing that is starting to impact historiography outside of Spain is Catalonian historical revisionism. I'm not a Spanish historian, however, saying that Borgia's nationality was Catalan is hopelessly out of touch. I changed it to "Kingdom of Valencia," which was part of the Crown of Aragon, but if somebody really wants to put something closer to nationality, Aragonese might be more accurate. That being said, I think listing "nationality" in this particular era is a little absurd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:300:8100:6BDE:457E:6F37:F1DB:61D5 ( talk) 19:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
According to the Vote count section, on the first ballot there were "nine votes for Carafa, seven for Borja, Costa, and Michiel, and five for Giuliano della Rovere", while on the second there were "nine for Carafa, eight for Borja, seven for Michiel, and five for Giuliano della Rovere". That makes 35 and 29 votes, respectively. But there were only 23 electors. Can anybody explain this discrepancy? 95.44.50.222 ( talk) 13:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1492 papal conclave article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1492 papal conclave has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Excellent article. Very informative.
I'd just be careful with the Allegations of Simony section - it's NPOV leaning towards not exactly neutral - that's all. Cheers, Corvus coronoides 23:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
This article has undergone a reassessment as part of the GA sweeps performed by the Good Article Project Quality taskforce in order to ensure that it still meets the requirements for Good Article status.
Overall, this article is quite good. There are just a few small things that I would like to see:
I will place this reassessment on hold to allow for these concerns to be addressed or discussed. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 04:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Looks like it's all done. I'll close this as a keep. Thanks for your help. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 16:32, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
One annoying thing that is starting to impact historiography outside of Spain is Catalonian historical revisionism. I'm not a Spanish historian, however, saying that Borgia's nationality was Catalan is hopelessly out of touch. I changed it to "Kingdom of Valencia," which was part of the Crown of Aragon, but if somebody really wants to put something closer to nationality, Aragonese might be more accurate. That being said, I think listing "nationality" in this particular era is a little absurd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:300:8100:6BDE:457E:6F37:F1DB:61D5 ( talk) 19:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
According to the Vote count section, on the first ballot there were "nine votes for Carafa, seven for Borja, Costa, and Michiel, and five for Giuliano della Rovere", while on the second there were "nine for Carafa, eight for Borja, seven for Michiel, and five for Giuliano della Rovere". That makes 35 and 29 votes, respectively. But there were only 23 electors. Can anybody explain this discrepancy? 95.44.50.222 ( talk) 13:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC)