This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Pannonian Basin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This one doesn't even contain the name Pannonia. Couldn't You use something like this? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d1/Pannoniansea_currentborders.png 94.254.181.253 ( talk) 10:21, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Explanation for my edits:
Why is the map of Pannonian/Carpathian basin only showing the "flat" part of the basin?
According to Wikipedia, citing: Drainage basin
"Other terms that are used to describe a drainage basin are catchment, catchment area, catchment basin, drainage area, river basin, water basin and watershed."
This means that the catchment part (mountains) are also part of the basin. Abdulka ( talk) 09:01, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
The trouble began with this string of anonymous unexplained edits - as usual. I'm reverting them. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 08:06, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
It looks like a map of Greater Hungary to me to :). It is very strange for this basin to follow the exact borders of this historical political entity. According to other maps of the Basin, it should go more south than the exact borders of Vojvodina. Also it includes the exact territory of Transylvania -which the basin doesn`t :). Anyway, since there is no clear evidence about this, and this is not the subject the important thing is that this doesn`t represent the Pannonian Basin map and as such it should be removed. Also this map doesn`t follow the referenced map about this subject. Adrian ( talk) 10:47, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
The Pannonian Basin isn't a "basin" in the strict hydrological sense. The entire Pannonian Basin is within the Danube basin, but obviously not the entire Danube basin is part of the Pannonian basin. So it is futile to draw maps of watersheds. I agree that this map gives a good impression of the extent of the basin. Perhaps it might be better to use "plain" throughout to avoid such misunderstandings. But of course, a "plain" has no strict definition either, even less so than a "basin". And google book makes clear that "Pannonian Basin" is by far the more common term than "Pannonian Plain". It is a geological or geomorphological term and is not suited for ethnic or patriotic bickering.
The Pannonian Basin is what was on the bottom of the Pannonian Sea. The Pannonian Sea lasted for 9 million years. Obviously anyone discussing a concept stretching over such time periods isn't going to bother about narrow-minded questions on which village exactly is Pannonian, which is peri-Pannonian and which is non-Pannonian. -- dab (𒁳) 10:53, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Please STOP to make politics on Wikipedia and please STOP to call the Carpathian Basin as Great Hungary, even if the Great Hungary like other countries was in the Carpathian Basin.
So, you have to choice to call the whole article as Pannonian Basin, and remove that "or" Carpathian Basin, because the two names don't match. The Carpathian Basin includes more then
the Pannonian Basin.
Heinrich Reinhard (
talk)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Pannonian Basin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Upon coming to this page and arriving at the Region section, I couldn't help but note that *every* country in the list was linked to its WIKI page -- except for Hungary. Each of those links were removed (if they ever existed) by someone clearly harboring some sort of bias against the country. This is my first Talk comment ever, but I wanted to make a note of what I found and corrected. People who spend their time doing these types of petty link removals clearly need their editing privileges revoked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilona.Meagher ( talk • contribs) 19:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Should these sections be combined into one? They both seem to contain appropriate information for a Geography section, though the first, shorter section is missing some citations. Helenofbrooklyn ( talk) 04:14, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Pannonian Basin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This one doesn't even contain the name Pannonia. Couldn't You use something like this? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d1/Pannoniansea_currentborders.png 94.254.181.253 ( talk) 10:21, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Explanation for my edits:
Why is the map of Pannonian/Carpathian basin only showing the "flat" part of the basin?
According to Wikipedia, citing: Drainage basin
"Other terms that are used to describe a drainage basin are catchment, catchment area, catchment basin, drainage area, river basin, water basin and watershed."
This means that the catchment part (mountains) are also part of the basin. Abdulka ( talk) 09:01, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
The trouble began with this string of anonymous unexplained edits - as usual. I'm reverting them. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 08:06, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
It looks like a map of Greater Hungary to me to :). It is very strange for this basin to follow the exact borders of this historical political entity. According to other maps of the Basin, it should go more south than the exact borders of Vojvodina. Also it includes the exact territory of Transylvania -which the basin doesn`t :). Anyway, since there is no clear evidence about this, and this is not the subject the important thing is that this doesn`t represent the Pannonian Basin map and as such it should be removed. Also this map doesn`t follow the referenced map about this subject. Adrian ( talk) 10:47, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
The Pannonian Basin isn't a "basin" in the strict hydrological sense. The entire Pannonian Basin is within the Danube basin, but obviously not the entire Danube basin is part of the Pannonian basin. So it is futile to draw maps of watersheds. I agree that this map gives a good impression of the extent of the basin. Perhaps it might be better to use "plain" throughout to avoid such misunderstandings. But of course, a "plain" has no strict definition either, even less so than a "basin". And google book makes clear that "Pannonian Basin" is by far the more common term than "Pannonian Plain". It is a geological or geomorphological term and is not suited for ethnic or patriotic bickering.
The Pannonian Basin is what was on the bottom of the Pannonian Sea. The Pannonian Sea lasted for 9 million years. Obviously anyone discussing a concept stretching over such time periods isn't going to bother about narrow-minded questions on which village exactly is Pannonian, which is peri-Pannonian and which is non-Pannonian. -- dab (𒁳) 10:53, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Please STOP to make politics on Wikipedia and please STOP to call the Carpathian Basin as Great Hungary, even if the Great Hungary like other countries was in the Carpathian Basin.
So, you have to choice to call the whole article as Pannonian Basin, and remove that "or" Carpathian Basin, because the two names don't match. The Carpathian Basin includes more then
the Pannonian Basin.
Heinrich Reinhard (
talk)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Pannonian Basin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Upon coming to this page and arriving at the Region section, I couldn't help but note that *every* country in the list was linked to its WIKI page -- except for Hungary. Each of those links were removed (if they ever existed) by someone clearly harboring some sort of bias against the country. This is my first Talk comment ever, but I wanted to make a note of what I found and corrected. People who spend their time doing these types of petty link removals clearly need their editing privileges revoked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilona.Meagher ( talk • contribs) 19:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Should these sections be combined into one? They both seem to contain appropriate information for a Geography section, though the first, shorter section is missing some citations. Helenofbrooklyn ( talk) 04:14, 7 June 2023 (UTC)