![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Somewhere I read that the Panha 2091 was unlicensed, but I'm not sure. Leonidas15andihack ( talk) 18:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
It stats on the AH-1 Super Cobra page that the Panha is unlicensed. 68.117.134.243 ( talk) 15:28, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
The following text was in the article, and I moved it here to the talk page.
"There is a conflict in the description of the armament: that kind of attack helicopter would have 1 gun station in the front, nothing in the rear. Also, the 70mm rockets can hardly be conceived of as anti-tank, as they are too small a rocket to be an effective anti-tank round." Drdrama ( talk) 11:39, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Somewhere I read that the Panha 2091 was unlicensed, but I'm not sure. Leonidas15andihack ( talk) 18:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
It stats on the AH-1 Super Cobra page that the Panha is unlicensed. 68.117.134.243 ( talk) 15:28, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
The following text was in the article, and I moved it here to the talk page.
"There is a conflict in the description of the armament: that kind of attack helicopter would have 1 gun station in the front, nothing in the rear. Also, the 70mm rockets can hardly be conceived of as anti-tank, as they are too small a rocket to be an effective anti-tank round." Drdrama ( talk) 11:39, 19 October 2013 (UTC)