This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
I'm not sure that last paragraph about being the best selling game is actually true outside of some narrow window after launch.
75.162.253.36 (
talk) 01:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)reply
If there is a source to back up the claim, then I don't see why it isn't true. If there is a counter-claim, then it could be put here and the editors can evaulate it. However, considering the sequence of events, the likely-hood of being one is very low.
82.1.168.16 (
talk) 15:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Original heading: "Some guy deleting statements of fact"
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 20:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Wondering why some guy keeps deleting statements of fact regarding the CLAIM palworld was being investigated (Unsubstantiated, no source) when it was actually PokeZoo (Substantiated, proof provided) that was shutdown
24.36.192.244 (
talk) 19:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Reading the sources, I'm not getting the impression that they support the claim that the Nintendo statement was about PokeZoo and not Palworld.
Hemiauchenia (
talk) 21:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Can you find a source where nintendo went after palworld? Just curious. It was also speculation. There is, however, evidence in those articles that within 5 days of the statement, Nintendo (And affiliates) had Pokezoo (Metazoo) shut down. thats verifiable.
Elinias1 (
talk) 21:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Pokemon company is a nintendo product, alongside Creatures and Gamefreak. Not one mentioned anything about Palworld . So its speculation. How is another speculation invalid, but the first...is? I'd like to see a statement made by any of the 3 owning companies or pokemon with the mention of Palworld and Investigation.
Elinias1 (
talk) 22:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
As per this, there should be an edit to the original statement. Due to the fact that its not verifiable. Not a removal, but an addendum to it stating this. Because it reads as fact...when there is no source to refer to
Elinias1 (
talk) 22:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
https://corporate.pokemon.co.jp/media/news/detail/335.html If this is the official corporate post you are referring to, its a blanket statement that covers no company. Pokemon, and its owners, are notorious for filing lawsuits. They are probably "investigating" every game that releases on the market. there was 1 verifiable instance of Pokemon and owners going after content added to palworld by a modder, which was taken down, but its a reach to use the corporate statement as a fact.
Elinias1 (
talk) 22:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Don't get me wrong, I am not opposed in trimming the plagiarism bit further. It definitely shouldn't be expanded by mentioning another game.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Shouldn't mention pokemon. Period. Because the only 4 companies remotely capable of mentionionning palworld in this instance, didn't. it's purely speculation that they are speaking of palworld. I thought wiki was based on fact, not fiction.
Elinias1 (
talk) 10:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Ya i figured. Its a jacked up right wing conspiracy website. Its true because we say it is (No evidence needed) Wiki has lost all reliability.
Elinias1 (
talk) 02:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The company name does not include a space.
The official company name is "Pocketpair, Inc.", without a space. I had seen several versions of it myself, so I confirmed with Pocketpair (Hawkward) themselves. It is arguably stylized to "POCKET PAIR" in their logos but the officially registered name is "Pocketpair, Inc." or "Pocketpair" if you leave out the "Inc.". I can provide a screenshot of the e-mail, but you can also check the official website.
Ennocb (
talk) 02:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Please correct the company name. It's still incorrect.
Ennocb (
talk) 01:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)reply
this article is semi-protected, meaning only users who are
autoconfirmed or higher can edit it
you're autoconfirmed by now, so you could have been
bold and done that yourself if you wanted
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
I'm not sure that last paragraph about being the best selling game is actually true outside of some narrow window after launch.
75.162.253.36 (
talk) 01:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)reply
If there is a source to back up the claim, then I don't see why it isn't true. If there is a counter-claim, then it could be put here and the editors can evaulate it. However, considering the sequence of events, the likely-hood of being one is very low.
82.1.168.16 (
talk) 15:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Original heading: "Some guy deleting statements of fact"
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 20:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Wondering why some guy keeps deleting statements of fact regarding the CLAIM palworld was being investigated (Unsubstantiated, no source) when it was actually PokeZoo (Substantiated, proof provided) that was shutdown
24.36.192.244 (
talk) 19:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Reading the sources, I'm not getting the impression that they support the claim that the Nintendo statement was about PokeZoo and not Palworld.
Hemiauchenia (
talk) 21:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Can you find a source where nintendo went after palworld? Just curious. It was also speculation. There is, however, evidence in those articles that within 5 days of the statement, Nintendo (And affiliates) had Pokezoo (Metazoo) shut down. thats verifiable.
Elinias1 (
talk) 21:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Pokemon company is a nintendo product, alongside Creatures and Gamefreak. Not one mentioned anything about Palworld . So its speculation. How is another speculation invalid, but the first...is? I'd like to see a statement made by any of the 3 owning companies or pokemon with the mention of Palworld and Investigation.
Elinias1 (
talk) 22:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
As per this, there should be an edit to the original statement. Due to the fact that its not verifiable. Not a removal, but an addendum to it stating this. Because it reads as fact...when there is no source to refer to
Elinias1 (
talk) 22:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
https://corporate.pokemon.co.jp/media/news/detail/335.html If this is the official corporate post you are referring to, its a blanket statement that covers no company. Pokemon, and its owners, are notorious for filing lawsuits. They are probably "investigating" every game that releases on the market. there was 1 verifiable instance of Pokemon and owners going after content added to palworld by a modder, which was taken down, but its a reach to use the corporate statement as a fact.
Elinias1 (
talk) 22:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Don't get me wrong, I am not opposed in trimming the plagiarism bit further. It definitely shouldn't be expanded by mentioning another game.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Shouldn't mention pokemon. Period. Because the only 4 companies remotely capable of mentionionning palworld in this instance, didn't. it's purely speculation that they are speaking of palworld. I thought wiki was based on fact, not fiction.
Elinias1 (
talk) 10:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Ya i figured. Its a jacked up right wing conspiracy website. Its true because we say it is (No evidence needed) Wiki has lost all reliability.
Elinias1 (
talk) 02:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The company name does not include a space.
The official company name is "Pocketpair, Inc.", without a space. I had seen several versions of it myself, so I confirmed with Pocketpair (Hawkward) themselves. It is arguably stylized to "POCKET PAIR" in their logos but the officially registered name is "Pocketpair, Inc." or "Pocketpair" if you leave out the "Inc.". I can provide a screenshot of the e-mail, but you can also check the official website.
Ennocb (
talk) 02:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Please correct the company name. It's still incorrect.
Ennocb (
talk) 01:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)reply
this article is semi-protected, meaning only users who are
autoconfirmed or higher can edit it
you're autoconfirmed by now, so you could have been
bold and done that yourself if you wanted