Disambiguation | ||||
|
Note that Wikipedia is not a dictionary; it'd be fair to judge if 'power on reset', 'point of record', etc. don't have articles by themselves, then the page would best serve as a redirect to Portugal. ~ PseudoSudo 23:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
I propose the merging of the disambiguation page Por into the disambiguation page POR—or vice-versa—due to the fact that the title of the latter page is merely a capitalization of that of the former, and thus the two should merge into a single disambiguation page for the three-letter disambiguation title (with one page ultimately redirecting to the other), rather than confusingly being split into two short disambiguation pages of virtually the same topic as they currently remain. In addition, many of the articles listed on each page are better suited for the other, leading to further inconsistency and confusion. This problem must be resolved as soon as possible. — | J ~ Pæst| 02:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation | ||||
|
Note that Wikipedia is not a dictionary; it'd be fair to judge if 'power on reset', 'point of record', etc. don't have articles by themselves, then the page would best serve as a redirect to Portugal. ~ PseudoSudo 23:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
I propose the merging of the disambiguation page Por into the disambiguation page POR—or vice-versa—due to the fact that the title of the latter page is merely a capitalization of that of the former, and thus the two should merge into a single disambiguation page for the three-letter disambiguation title (with one page ultimately redirecting to the other), rather than confusingly being split into two short disambiguation pages of virtually the same topic as they currently remain. In addition, many of the articles listed on each page are better suited for the other, leading to further inconsistency and confusion. This problem must be resolved as soon as possible. — | J ~ Pæst| 02:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)