This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Outlook on the web article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
No consensus. After more than three weeks this request does not seem to be approaching general agreement to rename this article yet. As is usual with a no-consensus outcome, editors can strengthen their arguments and try again in a few months to garner consensus for a page move. Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy Publishing! ( nac by page mover) Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 16:07, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
It was proposed in this section that
Outlook on the web be
renamed and moved to
Exchange Online.
The discussion has been closed. Links:
current log •
target log |
Outlook on the web → Exchange Online – There are various articles for Outlook: Microsoft Outlook and Outlook.com, all these creates so much confusion. While this current platform was once named "Outlook on the web", I noticed that the current name has already been changed to "Exchange Online" (website inside infobox), while the Exchange Online namespace was linked to a section in Microsoft Exchange Server. I believe it has already become the common name, and it should also be changed to prevent confusion between multiple Microsoft email services. I hope to have everyone's input in case I have mixed up different services or platforms. Cheers. Wefk423 ( talk) 11:04, 19 April 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 13:47, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
@ Dreamy Jazz: @ Wefk423: The 2019 proposal only received one opposition without more views and hence was declined. I believe it's time for another move proposal since I agree about the status quo being very confusing. -- 148.252.129.141 ( talk) 15:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
On a side note, Outlook.com might need a change as well? Because "Outlook.com" is a name that is not used at all by Microsoft, if you check on their sites it is branded as just "Outlook". But then again it's confusing it still shares the same name as the Microsoft Outlook client software. -- 148.252.129.141 ( talk) 16:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Per consensus, different products. – robertsky ( talk) 12:29, 21 October 2023 (UTC) – robertsky ( talk) 12:29, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Outlook on the web → Exchange Online – As per the previous move proposal shown above, with my main reasoning being the very confusing current set-up of Microsoft Outlook, Outlook.com and Outlook on the web. If you maybe have a better suggestion other than Exchange Online then you can state it out as well. 148.252.129.141 ( talk) 16:05, 6 September 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. House Blaster talk 13:10, 14 September 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 14:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Outlook on the web article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
No consensus. After more than three weeks this request does not seem to be approaching general agreement to rename this article yet. As is usual with a no-consensus outcome, editors can strengthen their arguments and try again in a few months to garner consensus for a page move. Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy Publishing! ( nac by page mover) Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 16:07, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
It was proposed in this section that
Outlook on the web be
renamed and moved to
Exchange Online.
The discussion has been closed. Links:
current log •
target log |
Outlook on the web → Exchange Online – There are various articles for Outlook: Microsoft Outlook and Outlook.com, all these creates so much confusion. While this current platform was once named "Outlook on the web", I noticed that the current name has already been changed to "Exchange Online" (website inside infobox), while the Exchange Online namespace was linked to a section in Microsoft Exchange Server. I believe it has already become the common name, and it should also be changed to prevent confusion between multiple Microsoft email services. I hope to have everyone's input in case I have mixed up different services or platforms. Cheers. Wefk423 ( talk) 11:04, 19 April 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 13:47, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
@ Dreamy Jazz: @ Wefk423: The 2019 proposal only received one opposition without more views and hence was declined. I believe it's time for another move proposal since I agree about the status quo being very confusing. -- 148.252.129.141 ( talk) 15:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
On a side note, Outlook.com might need a change as well? Because "Outlook.com" is a name that is not used at all by Microsoft, if you check on their sites it is branded as just "Outlook". But then again it's confusing it still shares the same name as the Microsoft Outlook client software. -- 148.252.129.141 ( talk) 16:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Per consensus, different products. – robertsky ( talk) 12:29, 21 October 2023 (UTC) – robertsky ( talk) 12:29, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Outlook on the web → Exchange Online – As per the previous move proposal shown above, with my main reasoning being the very confusing current set-up of Microsoft Outlook, Outlook.com and Outlook on the web. If you maybe have a better suggestion other than Exchange Online then you can state it out as well. 148.252.129.141 ( talk) 16:05, 6 September 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. House Blaster talk 13:10, 14 September 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 14:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
|