This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network page were merged into OutServe-SLDN on July 12, 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Hellos, so as far as I can tell around last October we had:
Now we have:
I think we should have:
-- Awk ( talk) 07:30, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
This is just so uncontroversial! Merge completed. Bmclaughlin9 ( talk) 13:27, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
I gather from recent Facebook traffic that the board just fired Allyson Robinson, leading to a string of resignations. I wouldn't edit an article on something not really citeable, but if anyone is actively maintaining this article, you'll want to look into this & follow up. - Jmabel | Talk 22:12, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
• In the "references" section, citation "8" refers to "Josh" Aravosis. The linked article cites "John" Aravosis. 174.65.0.104 ( talk) 20:51, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Puma Maldonado — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.65.0.104 ( talk) 20:49, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Deletion of this entry was proposed by an Ip user giving this reason:
(1) Whether or not an organization is active or not, bankrupt or not, has nothing to do with having an entry for it. A defunct organization may merit an entry. (2) The report of bankruptcy cited above calls the organization "basically bankrupt", and legal bankruptcy is something an organization can emerge from. Why the rush to delete? (3) The history of OutServe, which merged into this new combined organization, is now part of the history of OutServe-SLDN. So the fact that it is included here makes sense. (4) And the organization continues to evolve. The article cited above discusses those plans and says:
OutServe-SLDN had to change as an organization. The bankruptcy simply ensured that the change was more abrupt, and uglier, than perhaps one might have hoped.
(5) If the entry needs to be improved with more coverage of either SLDN before the merger or with the activities of the organization post-merger, there are tags for that. Such problems don't call for deletion. Bmclaughlin9 ( talk) 00:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
References
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network page were merged into OutServe-SLDN on July 12, 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Hellos, so as far as I can tell around last October we had:
Now we have:
I think we should have:
-- Awk ( talk) 07:30, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
This is just so uncontroversial! Merge completed. Bmclaughlin9 ( talk) 13:27, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
I gather from recent Facebook traffic that the board just fired Allyson Robinson, leading to a string of resignations. I wouldn't edit an article on something not really citeable, but if anyone is actively maintaining this article, you'll want to look into this & follow up. - Jmabel | Talk 22:12, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
• In the "references" section, citation "8" refers to "Josh" Aravosis. The linked article cites "John" Aravosis. 174.65.0.104 ( talk) 20:51, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Puma Maldonado — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.65.0.104 ( talk) 20:49, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Deletion of this entry was proposed by an Ip user giving this reason:
(1) Whether or not an organization is active or not, bankrupt or not, has nothing to do with having an entry for it. A defunct organization may merit an entry. (2) The report of bankruptcy cited above calls the organization "basically bankrupt", and legal bankruptcy is something an organization can emerge from. Why the rush to delete? (3) The history of OutServe, which merged into this new combined organization, is now part of the history of OutServe-SLDN. So the fact that it is included here makes sense. (4) And the organization continues to evolve. The article cited above discusses those plans and says:
OutServe-SLDN had to change as an organization. The bankruptcy simply ensured that the change was more abrupt, and uglier, than perhaps one might have hoped.
(5) If the entry needs to be improved with more coverage of either SLDN before the merger or with the activities of the organization post-merger, there are tags for that. Such problems don't call for deletion. Bmclaughlin9 ( talk) 00:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
References