This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Estonia Mid‑importance Orzeł incident is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do list: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : WikiProject Estonia/Missing articles Assess : Rate each tagged article by quality and importance to the WikiProject if it has not been done. (See Category:Unassessed Estonia articles) Infobox : Add infoboxes to articles without it Maintain : Portal:Estonia Photo : Upload and/or add a photo to articles without it (See Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Estonia) Stubs : Add info to stub-articles and check for start-class. Poland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Baltic states / European / Polish / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Baltic states military history task force European military history task force Polish military history task force World War II task force

Why the new commander appeared?

• Because Lieutenant Colonel Henryk Kłoczkowski was in hospital. Ihave added that info. Mieciu K 19:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Lieutnant Colonel Henryk Kłoczkowski was not ill. Later during the war he was court-martialled and found guilty of cowardice. He was demoted to the "seamna" rank and expelled from the navy. Mateusz Borowiak "Stalowe drapieżniki" Wyd. AJ-Press 2005. ISBN  83-7237-161-X. Someone integrate this into text, I'm not good english speaker

Interesting article, but some things are not clear to me and they might be unclear to other readers too:

1. International law required all military ships to be interned by neutral parties. Please expand on that. What was the international law called? They were to be interned in what cases?

Added with link to Hague convention —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4rdi ( talk • contribs) 18:26, 2 September 2007 (UTC) reply

1. The submarine made it to Swedish waters and were provided with money and food for their safe return home, saying that "if one is returning from the underworld one should travel first class only". Who was saying that? The sub crew or the Swedes?

The 2 Estonian guards on the ship, who were taken captive by Polish crew. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4rdi ( talk • contribs) 02:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC) reply

1. Did the Estonians do any effort to stop the sub from escaping?
2. The lead says the sub eventually escaped to Britain, but later, the article only says that they made it to Sweden. How did they get from Sweden to Britain then?

— Kpalion ^(talk) 08:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply

The assertion Hague Convention of 1907, section XIII, Article 8, [2] requires all military ships to be interned by neutral parties is completely wrong! Read Article 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17! Masturbius ( talk) 19:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC) reply

For that matter read Article 8, which clearly does not say what it's being claimed to. Amazing that this language has stood for like a decade! TiC ^{( talk)} 15:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC) reply