This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Opposition to Vladimir Putin in Russia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Opposition to Vladimir Putin in Russia. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Opposition to Vladimir Putin in Russia at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The communist movement is quite large in Russia. As communists they don't like Russian capitalism or its leaders. Why do they not get a mention in this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A442:581E:1:309F:1EA7:ED13:6BCE ( talk) 23:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
The photographs in this article need to have citations. Holdek ( talk) 06:12, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
I request a neutrality revamp. "Draconian law" in not an okay phrase for Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.174.151.220 ( talk) 19:42, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Why it is Russian opposition? It means Opposition to Russia? There are no articles such british opposition, american opposition, french opposition etc. Opposition are parties in Parliament disagree with ruling party("United Russia"). These are LDPR, Communist Party, A Just Russia. Parties and groups are described in this article are enemies of russian history and statehood and influence groups of foreign states and organistaions. Maybe thay are non-system opposoition? Or Parties not in russian parlaiment. Noone calls articles about many little parties never won british, american, french elections british opposition, american opposition, french oppositions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.25.53.138 ( talk) 15:49, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Last month, a suggestion was made to merge Non-system opposition into this article. I here to declare my support for such a move. After all, both articles are very short and could easily fit together. Charles Essie ( talk) 01:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
There no Articles about American, German, Hungarian or Turkish Oppositions, do we really need this article. I mean if we need it we should write an article about the American Opposition too, the Two-Party-System of the USA is anarchonistic and obsolete and there isn't a really alternative to the two big parties.-- 141.19.228.15 ( talk) 16:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus. There are a few viewpoints about how the article could be modified to make this requested move more valid, and there are alternate options given for a move target, but nothing approaching a true consensus on any of those items. Primefac ( talk) 17:26, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Anti-Putin opposition in the Russian Federation → Russian opposition – This page has been moved numerous times without proper discussion to needlessly long names such as the current one based on the argument that Russian opposition is too ambiguous. I fail to see what's ambiguous about it. After all we've never had this argument about the Bahraini opposition or the Syrian opposition. Charles Essie ( talk) 20:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
The name is very odd. Putin Opposition makes sense but Anti-Putin Opposition sounds like a a group that are opposing those who are Anti-Putin. Otherwise I see no reason to oppose an article that is specifically about the opposition of Putin. Zedshort ( talk) 13:18, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
I am going to start expanding this article. Nikolai Romanov ( talk) 03:37, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Opposition to Vladimir Putin in Russia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
This section is quite outdated. Added modern leaders. "Western commentators have noted that during this period Russian nationalists and ultranationalist groups may have been the most significant right-wing opposition to Putin's government." - this statement also is a way outdated nowadays. If there is no some newer sources (the original source feb 2009), this should be removed. Swarrel ( talk) 23:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Should an infobox be added with groups and countries loyal to Putin and opposition? -- SpaceSandwich (talk) 15:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
This article has more photos than a museum gallery magazine. 10 photos for an article that doesn't even have 10,000 words? Each paragraph has a photo. Where is the auths on this issue. Might as well add a photo of a protest per sentence at this rate. If any of you editors happened to see some civil articles, you would notice, that there is space between the images. Or rather to rephrase those editors have knowledge to put the least amount of pictures in an article. Otherwise it isn't encyclopedia anymore. This article doesn't even constitute the spirit of a Wikipedia article or its guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proof32reserve ( talk • contribs) 02:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
This Article is actually POV because there is no Article about the Opposition to Merkel in Germany, to Macron in France, to Dukanovic in Montenegro or to Erdogan in Turkey. By the way Putins government consists out of periodic changed partyless so-called Technocrats and not of members of the ruling party.-- 88.66.134.118 ( talk) 13:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Opposition to Vladimir Putin in Russia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Opposition to Vladimir Putin in Russia. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Opposition to Vladimir Putin in Russia at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The communist movement is quite large in Russia. As communists they don't like Russian capitalism or its leaders. Why do they not get a mention in this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A442:581E:1:309F:1EA7:ED13:6BCE ( talk) 23:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
The photographs in this article need to have citations. Holdek ( talk) 06:12, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
I request a neutrality revamp. "Draconian law" in not an okay phrase for Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.174.151.220 ( talk) 19:42, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Why it is Russian opposition? It means Opposition to Russia? There are no articles such british opposition, american opposition, french opposition etc. Opposition are parties in Parliament disagree with ruling party("United Russia"). These are LDPR, Communist Party, A Just Russia. Parties and groups are described in this article are enemies of russian history and statehood and influence groups of foreign states and organistaions. Maybe thay are non-system opposoition? Or Parties not in russian parlaiment. Noone calls articles about many little parties never won british, american, french elections british opposition, american opposition, french oppositions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.25.53.138 ( talk) 15:49, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Last month, a suggestion was made to merge Non-system opposition into this article. I here to declare my support for such a move. After all, both articles are very short and could easily fit together. Charles Essie ( talk) 01:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
There no Articles about American, German, Hungarian or Turkish Oppositions, do we really need this article. I mean if we need it we should write an article about the American Opposition too, the Two-Party-System of the USA is anarchonistic and obsolete and there isn't a really alternative to the two big parties.-- 141.19.228.15 ( talk) 16:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus. There are a few viewpoints about how the article could be modified to make this requested move more valid, and there are alternate options given for a move target, but nothing approaching a true consensus on any of those items. Primefac ( talk) 17:26, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Anti-Putin opposition in the Russian Federation → Russian opposition – This page has been moved numerous times without proper discussion to needlessly long names such as the current one based on the argument that Russian opposition is too ambiguous. I fail to see what's ambiguous about it. After all we've never had this argument about the Bahraini opposition or the Syrian opposition. Charles Essie ( talk) 20:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
The name is very odd. Putin Opposition makes sense but Anti-Putin Opposition sounds like a a group that are opposing those who are Anti-Putin. Otherwise I see no reason to oppose an article that is specifically about the opposition of Putin. Zedshort ( talk) 13:18, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
I am going to start expanding this article. Nikolai Romanov ( talk) 03:37, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Opposition to Vladimir Putin in Russia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
This section is quite outdated. Added modern leaders. "Western commentators have noted that during this period Russian nationalists and ultranationalist groups may have been the most significant right-wing opposition to Putin's government." - this statement also is a way outdated nowadays. If there is no some newer sources (the original source feb 2009), this should be removed. Swarrel ( talk) 23:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Should an infobox be added with groups and countries loyal to Putin and opposition? -- SpaceSandwich (talk) 15:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
This article has more photos than a museum gallery magazine. 10 photos for an article that doesn't even have 10,000 words? Each paragraph has a photo. Where is the auths on this issue. Might as well add a photo of a protest per sentence at this rate. If any of you editors happened to see some civil articles, you would notice, that there is space between the images. Or rather to rephrase those editors have knowledge to put the least amount of pictures in an article. Otherwise it isn't encyclopedia anymore. This article doesn't even constitute the spirit of a Wikipedia article or its guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proof32reserve ( talk • contribs) 02:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
This Article is actually POV because there is no Article about the Opposition to Merkel in Germany, to Macron in France, to Dukanovic in Montenegro or to Erdogan in Turkey. By the way Putins government consists out of periodic changed partyless so-called Technocrats and not of members of the ruling party.-- 88.66.134.118 ( talk) 13:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)