This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The use of IDICE polls here is questionable, especially when the citation source is a right-wing Twitter account ( https://twitter.com/Datoworld/status/1388162981712773126). The sources for the last poll don't even share the same numbers. Not to mention the questionable links the pollster shares with right-wing influences. We can do better than this. -- ZX2021 ( talk) 20:50, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Going off this, the new "CIT" poll being cited now does not have a full report with methodology on the pollster's website ( http://citopinion.pe/publicaciones_opinion_y_mercado.html). If no one can track down the full report with methodology on the internet, then that poll should not be included. This is the standard across Wikipedia as far as I know. What are we doing here? -- ZX2021 ( talk) 14:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:10, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
such as "Catholic extremism", "far-right" and "neoliberal". Sounds like the author of this article has a personal bias in favor of the left and far-left causes. Therefore the article is not objective and neutrally written. 2003:DA:C72C:BF00:DD16:8E57:402A:B06E ( talk) 23:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The use of IDICE polls here is questionable, especially when the citation source is a right-wing Twitter account ( https://twitter.com/Datoworld/status/1388162981712773126). The sources for the last poll don't even share the same numbers. Not to mention the questionable links the pollster shares with right-wing influences. We can do better than this. -- ZX2021 ( talk) 20:50, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Going off this, the new "CIT" poll being cited now does not have a full report with methodology on the pollster's website ( http://citopinion.pe/publicaciones_opinion_y_mercado.html). If no one can track down the full report with methodology on the internet, then that poll should not be included. This is the standard across Wikipedia as far as I know. What are we doing here? -- ZX2021 ( talk) 14:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:10, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
such as "Catholic extremism", "far-right" and "neoliberal". Sounds like the author of this article has a personal bias in favor of the left and far-left causes. Therefore the article is not objective and neutrally written. 2003:DA:C72C:BF00:DD16:8E57:402A:B06E ( talk) 23:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)