Disambiguation | ||||
|
Not moved. The argument that opposes this request based upon policy appears to be strongest. While there is numerical consensus for the first move, there is no consensus for the second move, and obviously the "Open loop" title must be vacated in order to make the first move. Of course, there is no prejudice for a new requested move if one or more other "Open loop" articles are created. Have a Great Day and Happy Publishing! ( nac by page mover) Paine Ellsworth put'r there 01:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
– The disambig page should be at the noun form, not the adjective (hypheated) form. The article currently at that position is a tiny unsourced stub, certainly not primarytopic. Dicklyon ( talk) 02:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. – Ammarpad ( talk) 04:45, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Open loop which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 05:16, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved -- JHunterJ ( talk) 13:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
– Today marks the inauspicious one-year anniversary of the questionable closing of an RM that left a completely unsourced rhetorical device, once called "the stubbiest of stubs", as the primary meaning of "open loop". The rhetorical device is a question that cries out for an answer – i.e., a system that sorely needs feedback. Properly, open loop and open-loop should be WP:PRIMARYREDIRECTs to Control loop. — BarrelProof ( talk) 05:13, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation | ||||
|
Not moved. The argument that opposes this request based upon policy appears to be strongest. While there is numerical consensus for the first move, there is no consensus for the second move, and obviously the "Open loop" title must be vacated in order to make the first move. Of course, there is no prejudice for a new requested move if one or more other "Open loop" articles are created. Have a Great Day and Happy Publishing! ( nac by page mover) Paine Ellsworth put'r there 01:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
– The disambig page should be at the noun form, not the adjective (hypheated) form. The article currently at that position is a tiny unsourced stub, certainly not primarytopic. Dicklyon ( talk) 02:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. – Ammarpad ( talk) 04:45, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Open loop which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 05:16, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved -- JHunterJ ( talk) 13:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
– Today marks the inauspicious one-year anniversary of the questionable closing of an RM that left a completely unsourced rhetorical device, once called "the stubbiest of stubs", as the primary meaning of "open loop". The rhetorical device is a question that cries out for an answer – i.e., a system that sorely needs feedback. Properly, open loop and open-loop should be WP:PRIMARYREDIRECTs to Control loop. — BarrelProof ( talk) 05:13, 22 June 2019 (UTC)