![]() | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Open source Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Open source |
![]() | The contents of the Open-source model page were merged into Open source on 9 July 2021 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of January 19, 2008. |
|
![]() | This page has been cited as a
source by a notable professional or academic publication: Harvard Journal of Law & Technology |
![]() | This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
This article fails to address (or at least conceals the answer to) a key question:
What actually MAKES a program open source? For example, if a program is NOT open source, what prevents me from viewing and editing it as a text file?
This question is what brought me to this article. In my opinion, it is more than a key question. It is THE a key question. --- Dagme ( talk) 17:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
"Open source" (without dash, with dash, and disambiguation) are now redirected to the improved Open source disambiguation which may become a WP:broad concept article to reduce the extreme number of disambiguation-link alarms. Please read more on the latest developments on Talk:Open source and feel free to improve Open source. ~ JasonCarswell (talk) 17:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Folks,
I came across this wiki page - /info/en/?search=Open-source_model#Economics and within the table, a company called 'Sauce Labs' is described as the leading company for Selenium (as seen in the table). That being said, the citation used - https://www.battery.com/powered/boss-index-tracking-explosive-growth-open-source-software/ clearly mentions BrowserStack and Sauce Labs. Could you guide me on the best way of incorporating 'BrowserStack' into the table? I am a novice and want to be cautious as there is also a conflict of interest (I work for BrowserStack).
Thank you.
![]() | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Open source Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Open source |
![]() | The contents of the Open-source model page were merged into Open source on 9 July 2021 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of January 19, 2008. |
|
![]() | This page has been cited as a
source by a notable professional or academic publication: Harvard Journal of Law & Technology |
![]() | This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
This article fails to address (or at least conceals the answer to) a key question:
What actually MAKES a program open source? For example, if a program is NOT open source, what prevents me from viewing and editing it as a text file?
This question is what brought me to this article. In my opinion, it is more than a key question. It is THE a key question. --- Dagme ( talk) 17:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
"Open source" (without dash, with dash, and disambiguation) are now redirected to the improved Open source disambiguation which may become a WP:broad concept article to reduce the extreme number of disambiguation-link alarms. Please read more on the latest developments on Talk:Open source and feel free to improve Open source. ~ JasonCarswell (talk) 17:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Folks,
I came across this wiki page - /info/en/?search=Open-source_model#Economics and within the table, a company called 'Sauce Labs' is described as the leading company for Selenium (as seen in the table). That being said, the citation used - https://www.battery.com/powered/boss-index-tracking-explosive-growth-open-source-software/ clearly mentions BrowserStack and Sauce Labs. Could you guide me on the best way of incorporating 'BrowserStack' into the table? I am a novice and want to be cautious as there is also a conflict of interest (I work for BrowserStack).
Thank you.