This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Open source Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Open source |
The contents of the Open-source model page were merged into Open source on 9 July 2021 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of January 19, 2008. |
To-do list for Open-source model:
|
This page has been cited as a
source by a notable professional or academic publication: Harvard Journal of Law & Technology |
This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Open-source model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
This article fails to address (or at least conceals the answer to) a key question:
What actually MAKES a program open source? For example, if a program is NOT open source, what prevents me from viewing and editing it as a text file?
This question is what brought me to this article. In my opinion, it is more than a key question. It is THE a key question. --- Dagme ( talk) 17:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
"Open source" (without dash, with dash, and disambiguation) are now redirected to the improved Open source disambiguation which may become a WP:broad concept article to reduce the extreme number of disambiguation-link alarms. Please read more on the latest developments on Talk:Open source and feel free to improve Open source. ~ JasonCarswell (talk) 17:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Folks,
I came across this wiki page - /info/en/?search=Open-source_model#Economics and within the table, a company called 'Sauce Labs' is described as the leading company for Selenium (as seen in the table). That being said, the citation used - https://www.battery.com/powered/boss-index-tracking-explosive-growth-open-source-software/ clearly mentions BrowserStack and Sauce Labs. Could you guide me on the best way of incorporating 'BrowserStack' into the table? I am a novice and want to be cautious as there is also a conflict of interest (I work for BrowserStack).
Thank you.
This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Open source Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Open source |
The contents of the Open-source model page were merged into Open source on 9 July 2021 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of January 19, 2008. |
To-do list for Open-source model:
|
This page has been cited as a
source by a notable professional or academic publication: Harvard Journal of Law & Technology |
This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Open-source model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
This article fails to address (or at least conceals the answer to) a key question:
What actually MAKES a program open source? For example, if a program is NOT open source, what prevents me from viewing and editing it as a text file?
This question is what brought me to this article. In my opinion, it is more than a key question. It is THE a key question. --- Dagme ( talk) 17:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
"Open source" (without dash, with dash, and disambiguation) are now redirected to the improved Open source disambiguation which may become a WP:broad concept article to reduce the extreme number of disambiguation-link alarms. Please read more on the latest developments on Talk:Open source and feel free to improve Open source. ~ JasonCarswell (talk) 17:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Folks,
I came across this wiki page - /info/en/?search=Open-source_model#Economics and within the table, a company called 'Sauce Labs' is described as the leading company for Selenium (as seen in the table). That being said, the citation used - https://www.battery.com/powered/boss-index-tracking-explosive-growth-open-source-software/ clearly mentions BrowserStack and Sauce Labs. Could you guide me on the best way of incorporating 'BrowserStack' into the table? I am a novice and want to be cautious as there is also a conflict of interest (I work for BrowserStack).
Thank you.