This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Open-source hardware article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
On 2 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Open hardware. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
What about the new promising IBM Cell Processor?
I read at many places, it is supposed to be "open source hardware":
If anybody knows sth. about it => Please add it here!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.95.147.244 ( talk • contribs)
RYF certifications have nothing to do with free or open hardware. According to https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Software_Foundation&oldid=863791402#Hardware_endorsements_(RYF) (current revision at time of posting):
"To be granted certification, a product must use 100% Free Software, allow user installation of modified software, be free of back doors and conform with several other requirements."
The FSF's "Respects Your Freedom hardware certification requirements" ( https://www.fsf.org/resources/hw/endorsement/criteria) only requires that the hardware is shipped and usable with only 100% free software. In fact, the requirements only mention the word 'hardware' in the title and preamble.
the link for TabbyEVO in, Forms of open-source hardware > Mechatronics redirects to the archived old site in the wayback machine. I think they changed the website and it now is https://www.openmotors.co/product/tabbyevo/. I don't know how to convey the closure of old website and the shift to new one in the article, maybe it should be done in TabbyEVO's own wiki article page?
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 ( talk) 21:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Open-source hardware → Open hardware – Open hardware is a more established and descriptive term, although some use the term 'Open-source hardware'. See: https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-hardware & https://ohwr.org+ Avoinlähde ( talk) 20:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Many of Hitachi's SuperH/SH2 patents are now open in this project: [1], but I'm not sure it belongs in the article. Family Guy Guy ( talk) 14:44, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Open-source hardware article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
On 2 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Open hardware. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
What about the new promising IBM Cell Processor?
I read at many places, it is supposed to be "open source hardware":
If anybody knows sth. about it => Please add it here!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.95.147.244 ( talk • contribs)
RYF certifications have nothing to do with free or open hardware. According to https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Free_Software_Foundation&oldid=863791402#Hardware_endorsements_(RYF) (current revision at time of posting):
"To be granted certification, a product must use 100% Free Software, allow user installation of modified software, be free of back doors and conform with several other requirements."
The FSF's "Respects Your Freedom hardware certification requirements" ( https://www.fsf.org/resources/hw/endorsement/criteria) only requires that the hardware is shipped and usable with only 100% free software. In fact, the requirements only mention the word 'hardware' in the title and preamble.
the link for TabbyEVO in, Forms of open-source hardware > Mechatronics redirects to the archived old site in the wayback machine. I think they changed the website and it now is https://www.openmotors.co/product/tabbyevo/. I don't know how to convey the closure of old website and the shift to new one in the article, maybe it should be done in TabbyEVO's own wiki article page?
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 ( talk) 21:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Open-source hardware → Open hardware – Open hardware is a more established and descriptive term, although some use the term 'Open-source hardware'. See: https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-hardware & https://ohwr.org+ Avoinlähde ( talk) 20:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Many of Hitachi's SuperH/SH2 patents are now open in this project: [1], but I'm not sure it belongs in the article. Family Guy Guy ( talk) 14:44, 19 May 2023 (UTC)