 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Boy Who Never Slept's license is by-nc-sa, so it's not free. Gallaecio ( talk) 10:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
The opening line states: "Open source films (also known as open content films and...". But there is an article on open content film, should these two be merged? ... ( talk) 21:53, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Either merge it or remove one list. Two lists are stupid, one is always incomplete. Thanks. 92.39.27.199 ( talk) 22:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
link to Jathia's Wager or to the movie's download and sources is nowhere to be found under that URL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.58.78.141 ( talk) 16:45, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Actually, the real reason these films are interesting is the license. The best way to describe these to people is with the phrase "Open licensed". I'd like to suggest a better name for this list is "Open licensed film". 208.72.192.2 ( talk) 19:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- just what is there about "open source" that isn't strictly to do with the license? 216.138.75.50 ( talk) 21:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv ( talk) 09:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Open source film → Open-source film –
Per WP:HYPHEN. While some sources drop the hyphen, this is common among field professionals and in advertising. Here, the hyphen is necessary for non-experts, as well as being prescribed by the major US and UK style guides. In many places, the absence of the hyphen is ambiguous. Tony (talk) 03:34, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support, assuming my fix to your typo is OK. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing, Dick. Tony (talk) 08:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support per nom. For a general audience such as Wikipedia's the term is ambiguous without the hyphen. — AjaxSmack 04:06, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Does The Forbidden Education fit in this article ? Astirmays ( talk) 20:07, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
| This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Boy Who Never Slept's license is by-nc-sa, so it's not free. Gallaecio ( talk) 10:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
The opening line states: "Open source films (also known as open content films and...". But there is an article on open content film, should these two be merged? ... ( talk) 21:53, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Either merge it or remove one list. Two lists are stupid, one is always incomplete. Thanks. 92.39.27.199 ( talk) 22:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
link to Jathia's Wager or to the movie's download and sources is nowhere to be found under that URL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.58.78.141 ( talk) 16:45, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Actually, the real reason these films are interesting is the license. The best way to describe these to people is with the phrase "Open licensed". I'd like to suggest a better name for this list is "Open licensed film". 208.72.192.2 ( talk) 19:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- just what is there about "open source" that isn't strictly to do with the license? 216.138.75.50 ( talk) 21:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv ( talk) 09:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Open source film → Open-source film –
Per WP:HYPHEN. While some sources drop the hyphen, this is common among field professionals and in advertising. Here, the hyphen is necessary for non-experts, as well as being prescribed by the major US and UK style guides. In many places, the absence of the hyphen is ambiguous. Tony (talk) 03:34, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support, assuming my fix to your typo is OK. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing, Dick. Tony (talk) 08:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support per nom. For a general audience such as Wikipedia's the term is ambiguous without the hyphen. — AjaxSmack 04:06, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Does The Forbidden Education fit in this article ? Astirmays ( talk) 20:07, 12 April 2017 (UTC)