This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
A. I think it would be helpful to rename the existing article sections to make them more in line with better articles on Marx works, this will not be a “bold edit” as I will just be changing section names, not their content. Manboobies ( talk) 20:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC) I have renamed one for now, to be in line with the communist manifesto article.-- Manboobies ( talk) 20:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
B. The main body section “2. history of publication” should be below “3. Interpretations” and “4. Reference to Müntzer”, because 3&4 are discussions of content, like 1., Manboobies ( talk) 20:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Volunteer Marek. I didn't think it was redundant, but I don't feel strongly about it. If you do I can accept it. Sorry about not having an edit summary, I know I put one in originally, but then I went back to read it again and must have forgotten to put it back in. An honest mistake. // Timothy:: talk 05:58, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
If you have an opinion, please share at Template_talk:Antisemitism_sidebar#On_the_Jewish_Question-BRD. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 20:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
The article here gives a single block of quotation which is not in the original text in as much as it is a grouping of separate quotes from the text. The quotation also seems to avoid some of the sympathetic language used by Marx and focuses almost exclusively on Marx's references to stereotypes. -- IronMaidenRocks ( talk) 02:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money. Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time.
Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money. Money is the jealous god of Israel,
Sacks later referred to Marxism as part of the mutating virus of antisemitism. Titanium Dragon ( talk)
Is it not worth mentioning that both of the sources cited in support of the view that Marx's essay was not antisemitic are themselves self-avowed Marxists? They're hardly the most neutral sources for such a defense.
To rephrase, I hardly think two avowed Marxist scholars defending Marx against the charge of antisemitism constitutes a neutral defense of the claim made by non-Marxists.
If there were non-Marixst scholars who also defend that the essay is not antisemitic, would these not be *actually* neutral sources? KronosAlight ( talk) 18:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
A. I think it would be helpful to rename the existing article sections to make them more in line with better articles on Marx works, this will not be a “bold edit” as I will just be changing section names, not their content. Manboobies ( talk) 20:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC) I have renamed one for now, to be in line with the communist manifesto article.-- Manboobies ( talk) 20:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
B. The main body section “2. history of publication” should be below “3. Interpretations” and “4. Reference to Müntzer”, because 3&4 are discussions of content, like 1., Manboobies ( talk) 20:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Volunteer Marek. I didn't think it was redundant, but I don't feel strongly about it. If you do I can accept it. Sorry about not having an edit summary, I know I put one in originally, but then I went back to read it again and must have forgotten to put it back in. An honest mistake. // Timothy:: talk 05:58, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
If you have an opinion, please share at Template_talk:Antisemitism_sidebar#On_the_Jewish_Question-BRD. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 20:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
The article here gives a single block of quotation which is not in the original text in as much as it is a grouping of separate quotes from the text. The quotation also seems to avoid some of the sympathetic language used by Marx and focuses almost exclusively on Marx's references to stereotypes. -- IronMaidenRocks ( talk) 02:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money. Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time.
Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money. Money is the jealous god of Israel,
Sacks later referred to Marxism as part of the mutating virus of antisemitism. Titanium Dragon ( talk)
Is it not worth mentioning that both of the sources cited in support of the view that Marx's essay was not antisemitic are themselves self-avowed Marxists? They're hardly the most neutral sources for such a defense.
To rephrase, I hardly think two avowed Marxist scholars defending Marx against the charge of antisemitism constitutes a neutral defense of the claim made by non-Marxists.
If there were non-Marixst scholars who also defend that the essay is not antisemitic, would these not be *actually* neutral sources? KronosAlight ( talk) 18:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)