![]() | Omphalotus nidiformis is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 13, 2020. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 5, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the
ghost fungus (pictured) from southern
Australia is so named as it is
bioluminescent? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is the spore print white as stated in the text or yellow as stated in the taxobox ? [Please delete when corrected.]
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of December 10, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far.— Ruslik ( talk) 09:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Comments:
1) I think that the single sentence second paragraphs in the lead can be merged with the first paragraph.
2) The lead says "...leads to very severe cramps, vomiting, and diarrhea". However the last section says "There is no diarrhea and patients recover ..." So does it cause diarrhea or not ?
3) It may be better to convert the last ref (Griffiths, K (1985)) into the inline format and use it where appropriate.
Ruslik ( talk) 09:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I will promote the article to GA. Ruslik ( talk) 11:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
The original account of Drummond appeared in Hooker's Journal of Botany - April 1842. Would be good to find... Casliber ( talk · contribs) 23:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
What does this sentence mean?
It can be detected at night a faint whitish eerie glow can be seen at the base of trees in sclerophyll forests.
I have removed it for now because I don't understand what it's trying to convey, and the parts I do understand might be incorrect (I have only seen the glow described as green, not white). - kotra ( talk) 19:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Will note concerns or ideas here as I come across them. Sasata ( talk) 06:29, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Omphalotus nidiformis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:31, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Omphalotus nidiformis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.australasianmycology.com/pages/pdf/14/4/47.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.australasianmycology.com/pages/pdf/15/1/8.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:49, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Omphalotus nidiformis is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 13, 2020. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 5, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the
ghost fungus (pictured) from southern
Australia is so named as it is
bioluminescent? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is the spore print white as stated in the text or yellow as stated in the taxobox ? [Please delete when corrected.]
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of December 10, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far.— Ruslik ( talk) 09:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Comments:
1) I think that the single sentence second paragraphs in the lead can be merged with the first paragraph.
2) The lead says "...leads to very severe cramps, vomiting, and diarrhea". However the last section says "There is no diarrhea and patients recover ..." So does it cause diarrhea or not ?
3) It may be better to convert the last ref (Griffiths, K (1985)) into the inline format and use it where appropriate.
Ruslik ( talk) 09:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I will promote the article to GA. Ruslik ( talk) 11:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
The original account of Drummond appeared in Hooker's Journal of Botany - April 1842. Would be good to find... Casliber ( talk · contribs) 23:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
What does this sentence mean?
It can be detected at night a faint whitish eerie glow can be seen at the base of trees in sclerophyll forests.
I have removed it for now because I don't understand what it's trying to convey, and the parts I do understand might be incorrect (I have only seen the glow described as green, not white). - kotra ( talk) 19:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Will note concerns or ideas here as I come across them. Sasata ( talk) 06:29, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Omphalotus nidiformis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:31, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Omphalotus nidiformis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.australasianmycology.com/pages/pdf/14/4/47.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.australasianmycology.com/pages/pdf/15/1/8.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:49, 30 September 2017 (UTC)