Old Melbourne Gaol has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is an interesting article, but it could do with serious expansion. Is it STILL a gaol. If not, then when did it close and what is it today?
Unless we can find a good source, I suggest that we remove the table of people who were hanged:
Peter Chastain ( talk) 02:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk) 13:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Placing on hold. Arsenikk (talk) 13:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Arsenikk, thanks greatly for looking at this article. I have attempted to clean up and fix the issues you raised above (I am still working on them and will let you know when good to go again). I just have a few queries...
Ref 24 is dead. I just checked it, it seems fine. Can you check it again?
The section about Ned Kelly is almost entirely unreferenced, similarly Frederick Bailey Deeming and the last paragraph under "Closure and re-opening I have trimmed that unsourced section after "closure and re-opening", I don't believe it adds anything valuable to the article anyway and I cannot find any source for it. For the other sections, I can add the inline sources - but do they necassarily need it if the main articles for those people are sourced?
Cheers Jwoodger ( talk) 00:27, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Just for information: This article quotes a number of key sentences in this Wikipedia article. Jwoodger ( talk) 00:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Old Melbourne Gaol. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Old Melbourne Gaol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Old Melbourne Gaol has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is an interesting article, but it could do with serious expansion. Is it STILL a gaol. If not, then when did it close and what is it today?
Unless we can find a good source, I suggest that we remove the table of people who were hanged:
Peter Chastain ( talk) 02:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk) 13:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Placing on hold. Arsenikk (talk) 13:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Arsenikk, thanks greatly for looking at this article. I have attempted to clean up and fix the issues you raised above (I am still working on them and will let you know when good to go again). I just have a few queries...
Ref 24 is dead. I just checked it, it seems fine. Can you check it again?
The section about Ned Kelly is almost entirely unreferenced, similarly Frederick Bailey Deeming and the last paragraph under "Closure and re-opening I have trimmed that unsourced section after "closure and re-opening", I don't believe it adds anything valuable to the article anyway and I cannot find any source for it. For the other sections, I can add the inline sources - but do they necassarily need it if the main articles for those people are sourced?
Cheers Jwoodger ( talk) 00:27, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Just for information: This article quotes a number of key sentences in this Wikipedia article. Jwoodger ( talk) 00:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Old Melbourne Gaol. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Old Melbourne Gaol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)