From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

On the topic of the article being of low importance...

So I recently received a message from user Crystallizedcarbon, saying that the article has been nominated for deletion, and a deletion request template had been placed on the article. This seems to be absent from some reason, and I didn't remove it. Either way, I do think this game is important enough for a page, I can't really give a concrete source for the game being popular, but it's definitely not a very "underground" game, it had a quite big peak in popularity a few years ago. I'm not sure if the article is still in proposal for being deleted so I figured I'd state this anyways. Feel free to argue against my point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CipherCraft618 ( talkcontribs) 02:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC) reply

@ CipherCraft618:No, it's notable and passes WP:GNG, the page was actually on WP:VG/R for a while. I was the one who removed the Proposed deletion. I put some references in the above box and you can find more at WP:VG/R if you use Ctrl+F. Please try to cite everything from a reliable source per WP:RS, the Visual Editor makes it not hard to do. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 03:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

On the topic of the article being of low importance...

So I recently received a message from user Crystallizedcarbon, saying that the article has been nominated for deletion, and a deletion request template had been placed on the article. This seems to be absent from some reason, and I didn't remove it. Either way, I do think this game is important enough for a page, I can't really give a concrete source for the game being popular, but it's definitely not a very "underground" game, it had a quite big peak in popularity a few years ago. I'm not sure if the article is still in proposal for being deleted so I figured I'd state this anyways. Feel free to argue against my point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CipherCraft618 ( talkcontribs) 02:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC) reply

@ CipherCraft618:No, it's notable and passes WP:GNG, the page was actually on WP:VG/R for a while. I was the one who removed the Proposed deletion. I put some references in the above box and you can find more at WP:VG/R if you use Ctrl+F. Please try to cite everything from a reliable source per WP:RS, the Visual Editor makes it not hard to do. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 03:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook